Thread 521287580

Should non-property owners be allowed to vote? Personally I don't see why "people" who wasted their money on funko-pops and trips to Europe should have the same say as those who buckled down, contributed to society and invested in their future.
What are your thoughts?

>price everyone out of owning a home by buying up all the property and importing endless third worlders to drive up demand
>suddenly you need property to vote
>now the only people who vote will do whatever they want to you (they will fuck you over)
Delightfully devilish, OP

>>521287690
Oh and the best part is that this already happens; the voting part is mostly just pretend

>>521287580 (OP)
Our shitposting used to be nuanced. You can tell albotross dumped some 70IQ bioweapons these days.

>>521287580 (OP)
Voting should be exactly like driving. People should have to pass a test to show competency. And retake a test every 7 years to renew. This weeds out people who are uninterested in issues from casting lazy votes. This weeds out older people whose minds have deteriorated from casting blind party line votes - "I always vote [party]!" A monkey can be trained to randomly fill out a mail-in ballot. A monkey can be trained to vote only red or only blue. These people are not engaged in the process.

>>521287580 (OP)
Nobody has property if they have to pay a yearly lease to the government (PROPERTY TAX) or its given to a bank. We live in Communism. That's why the West is being destroyed. Pic