image
md5: 96da1d74a1d034be6b89060f38defa21
🔍
>Be Cagematch
>Site gets a fuck ton of errors in the span of almost a month
>Owners suspect it may be AI, corporate crawlers, or a botnet
>Emails not working. Probably related to the current outages
Is Cagematch's system starting to implode under its own popularity?
>>18045099 (OP)After Cagematch and Meltzer finally die, wrestling can start the long process of healing
>>18045099 (OP)Kill all cagematch users. Those german trannies are a blight on humanity
>>18045099 (OP)Any place that lets faggots rate wrestling is bad, but Cagematch definitely has worth as a database. Hope they fix it
ive been to germany before
any questions?
Edrones hate Cagematch because they're terrified of the idea of exposing eslop to any sort of criticism.
>>18045113honestly, Cagematch is good for being a database for past shows but the ratings system in my opinion needs to die.
>>18045169The database isnt even good because only mods can add or edit shows and they miss dozens and dozens of shows every month
>>18045099 (OP)I always use profightdb because cage match puts all the dates in homosexual
>>18045169wikipedia is unironically a better database
>>18045154Yeah, why does that fag Oliver Copp still charge full retail for TNM7 which was released like 25 years ago?
>>18045239Its disgusting seeing two night shows have 'Tag 1' and 'Tag 2'. I'm glad Germany is being invaded by muslims
>>18045154me too. i was surprised at how fat people were, thought europoors were supposed to thin
>>18045099 (OP)that coincides with the embarrassment at money in the bank, probably regular demented e-drones, or possibly legentil activities
>>18045246eh not really considering how Wikipedia has been for editors. Contradictory rules on sources turned me away.
>>18045239True. Sometimes I have to submit a suggestion multiple times before they get it. But they usually are just taking it one at a time.
I can't study cagematch because it's offline half the time.
>>18045099 (OP)Nope, it's me sending my 500k bots there hourly
>running a website with no WAF/firewall
>>18045099 (OP)i dont care for the biased smark reviews but its funny looking at random old cards