>>18166175 (OP)
I'd plow the fuck out of that busty hog, I'm ashamed to say. Just get her wide open on a countertop with her fat hairy bush that's been in baking her jeans all day, and her big danglies waiting to be sucked. I'd cum inside her.
>>18166175 (OP)
Kek at that championship belt
Come on, man....I know it was a different time and well into the past, but they couldn't come up with a fancier-looking belt than that?
>BY GAWD WHAT A WOMAN >AND YOU CAN GET IT UP FOR THIS YOU SON OF A BITCH WITH TODAY'S SPONSOR BLUE CHEW >USE PROMO CODE JR AND YOU TOO WILL SAY "AS GOD AS MY WITNESS, SHE IS BROKEN IN HALF" >BUY MY VIAGRA YOU ANIMAL
>>18166385 >Daily reminder that masturbation didn't exist before the 90s.
yes, your father went to the woods just for a walk and not for the discarded playboy magazine he found there
>>18166175 (OP)
No. Also, people didn't goon back then. You jerked off to cum and get on with your day, not spend hours edging until you enter the goon zone.
>>18167208 >I was reminded of this when Playboy.com deputy editor Marc Bernardin reported that Nathan Fillion and his childhood friends found a stash of Playboys in a tree-house in the woods. Then Wil Wheaton told Playboy.com that he hid a July 1985 Playboy in a tree behind his home. Patton Oswalt remembers a childhood spent chancing upon discarded Playboys in the wooded area behind his suburban Virginia development. Tig Notaro found herself some Playboys in the woods as well. >Tucked in the comment sections of various websites are testimonials from men who recall the unbridled joy of finding naked women in the wild. The nerds who read Gizmodo found Playboys in the woods. The libertarians who read Reason.com found Playboys in the woods. The artsy entrepreneurs at Threadless found — you guessed it — Playboys in the woods. >From coast to coast squirrels are scampering over Angie Everhart’s face, beavers are fortifying their dams with the hotness of Raquel Pomplun while deer are finding their sexuality challenged by our Girls of Canada spread. https://web.archive.org/web/20171003090906/http://www.playboy.com/galleries/every-february-playboy-cover#slide-48 https://web.archive.org/web/20171003090910/http://www.playboy.com/galleries/complete-list-of-1980s-playboy-covers#slide-11
If you think these are "gay magazines", you might be a tranny.
>>18167288 >saved as a pasta
????
I literally had to make 1 google search to confirm what I already knew was true for others, and copied it from there.
>>18167395
It's called lived experience, everyone was doing it.
You seem obsessed with relating this to pedophillia, and you have an image of a little girl saved on your harddrive. How very interesting. I'll need to send a tip to the FBI I think.
>>18167455
Incorrect application of the fallacy.
Doing something and coincidentally everyone else doing it does not equal observing others doing something and then taking part because it is popular.
There is a difference between eating cow shit because everyone else is doing it, and eating cow shit because you like it. I'll let your jeet ass decide which one is most applicable to you.
>>18167599 >goalposts go flying out of the stadium because pajeet is losing the argument and doesn't even know how to apply logical fallacies in the correct way >is now attempting to project falsehoods onto the other party because of his own failings as a man
many such cases
>>18167631
I just pray the judge will take your brilliant posts into account during your trial. >No, your honor. It's not weird that I research kids in the woods. Everybody does it! Here, look at these google search results!
>>18167690
Can you start just making your posts in Hindi and I'll just use Google Translate for them? Clearly arguing in English is too much for you, you just keep repeating the same jeetbabble, and I'm pretty sure you're bobbing your head at the keyboard.
>>18167143
c'mon baby light my fire, amirite? Shouldn't you instead be on reddit glorifying trannies and incompatible immigrants, you sybarite boomer POS?
