Who was in the right here?
No, he never should have lowered himself to working a program with a no dimes shitter midget like Michaels
Shawn carried that boomer
Michaels because that's how you're meant to sell for the Hulkster brother.
>>18343475 (OP)Hulkster and I donโt even like him. Shawn was just getting a taste of his own medicine and he lashed out.
Both, it was a collision of two whiny bitches who wouldn't put other people over, and that made for a hilarious watch.
>>18343475 (OP)Both, that match is kino.
>>18343475 (OP)Shawn has unironically been a bigger piece of shit in his career than Hulk has
>>18343475 (OP)It was just Shawn being a whiny bitch again
Rare instance of Hogan doing literally nothing wrong
If Michaels managed to convince Vince that he should go over, Hogan would have pulled the same tantrum where he'd just no sell everything Michaels did, like Hogan did with Undertaker when Taker was gonna win, and Hogan wouldn't be lifted for the Chokeslam or Tombstone.
>>18343859>Hogan would have pulled the same tantrum where he'd just no sell everything Michaels didNo selling is different than comically overselling.
the first match being summer slam was bad timing. hogan wouldn't have accepted a loss in a ppv but the only way you put him over in a 1-1 is having him win the rematch.
>>18344855If I remember the thing was Shawn wins first then Hogan wins the rematch but IT DIDNT WORK FOR HIM BROTHER
>>18343884That's how you're supposed to sell for the hulkster, fag.
>>18345185Like Michaels, now that's selling brother.
>>18343475 (OP)Shawn was being whinny again but he was in the right this time.
Made no sense for Hogan to go over and killing the entire feud was lame.
Hogan. Shawn got out politicked and threw a tantrum.
Michaels. Hogan needed to be humbled. It wasn't WCW 2000 anymore where he could get away with everything.