Why do science tards support whores when every research shows it's bad? You believe in science only when it's convenient?

Science tards should dislike whores more than religious tards, at least religious tard have their forgiveness cucked shit to rely on, while science shows hard proof that being a whore is objectively worse mentally, biologically and statistically

That shows how much simps there are out there. It doesn't matter if something is a verifiable fact, they still will reject in favor of some used pussy

Women are scientifically superior, a woman made the computer and created a whole new world.

if The Science was an entity in control of society and shaped it to be as efficient as possible then everyone would want to kill themselves

>>81474246 (OP)
>Science tards
As opposed to the smart people who make up their data? Science tard? That's great.

>science shows
Shows what? What study are you referencing? You're just making things up.

>>81474246 (OP)
Statics shows that living under Islam and Sharia laws means you are more likely happy and fulfilled, are you going to convert any time soon?
Yeah because knowing something is scientific doesn't mean you agree with it or like it.
I know you are a baiting fag but at least try to be more creative with your bait threads, retard.

>>81474301
Literally every research about sex, casual sex and oxytocin. Just a few papers as example:

>Sex-Dependent Regulation of Social Reward by Oxytocin: An Inverted U Hypothesis
>Was It Good for You? Gender Differences in Motives and Emotional Outcomes Following Casual Sex
>Why Do Women Regret Casual Sex More Than Men Do?
>Oxytocin Makes Inexperienced Men More Selective in Their Dating Strategy
>Gender Differences in Oxytocin-Associated Disruption of Decision Bias During Emotion Perception
>Is Casual Sex Emotionally Healthy for Men and Women?
>Re-examining The Link Between Premarital Sex and Divorce
>The Monogamy Paradox: What Do Love And Sex Have To Do With It?
>The neuroendocrinology of love

>>81474318
>just the truth says something doesn't mean I have to like it

you sound like a religious fag anon, sorry to break it to you

>>81474479
Death and cancer are objective truths, but that doesn't mean I want them.
See? Genuinely how are you so bad at this?

>>81474489
You changed "I agree" with "I want", disingenuous fuck
Nobody wants cancer but everyone can agree it exists

>>81474555
>"Agree with it or like it"
Behold the power of the English language!!!!!

>>81474318
You did exactly what OP said kek
Deconstruc what you don't like but let what you like alone

>>81474593
Agree neither like is synonyms with want

>>81474435
>Literally every research about sex, casual sex and oxytocin.
You can also add marriage, divorce and parenting
All of those are affected by a slut

>>81474246 (OP)
Nobody actually cares about facts. It's all feelings

>>81474435
>semi-informative post on modern /r9k/
cheers
summer just started and I already noticed an improvement in post quality here
oldfags eternally BTFOed

>>81474246 (OP)
People only care about their own interests. If something is against such interests they reject even if it's contradictory

>>81474246 (OP)
UHHHH but if I believe the bads about the whores then I lose social status and standing and get exiled from my social group of fellow retards. Soience only goes so far OP.

>>81474246 (OP)
Science is heavily influenced by societal norms and by the people that give them money
Even the researches that point out that casual sex fucks up your oxytocin receptors and turn you into a zombie that forever will want the next "dopamine hit", they are gentle and use nonaggressive language. They never abolish the decision of being a whore even though it only brings negative results

>>81476465
Imagine if they did the same with drugs
>*here is all the negative side effects of doing x drug*
>Anyway, it's up to you if you decide if you'll do it or not. We never would judge your terrible decision :)