Anonymous
6/14/2025, 5:30:24 AM No.81486844
You said:
For the entire span of human existence, we centered gender relations around the fact that men are active in sex and women are passive. This is a myth. Men have the capacity to be both active AND passive. Thus, we could divide men into two classes - tops and bottoms - and restructure our family unit into one with three genders instead of two. Doing so would confer great benefits on society.
>men get a boywife AND two wives (the ones he and his bottom would get individually in our current system)
>there are fewer tops than women and bottoms, so gynocentrism vanishes
>men enjoy the benefits of service and obedience from their three partners
>bottoms don't have to worry about responsibility or decision making
>only men work; fewer people in the workforce means higher wages, better jobs
>also no more incompetent workers
>four people sharing a home, more affordable
>also more people among whom to divide housework
>still a closed, committed relationship, so none of the downsides of free love
Thus far no one has demonstrated to me why these benefits would be a bad thing.
Anticipating counterarguments:
>you're gay and this is just your fetish
Correct, but that doesn't make my logic less sound
>it's not my heccin wholesome tradcath relationship!!
Yeah, traditional marriage is working SO well for us. You only support it because you grew up with it.
>men should be masculine/I wouldn't personally want to be a bottom
We've brainwashed men into believing that they have to be dominant and manly or they're failures. Really, a man submitting to his partner is just as valid as a man who dominates.
>I don't want a boywife that's gay
Don't have sex with him, just make him do housework. He's your property you can do whatever you want with him.
For the entire span of human existence, we centered gender relations around the fact that men are active in sex and women are passive. This is a myth. Men have the capacity to be both active AND passive. Thus, we could divide men into two classes - tops and bottoms - and restructure our family unit into one with three genders instead of two. Doing so would confer great benefits on society.
>men get a boywife AND two wives (the ones he and his bottom would get individually in our current system)
>there are fewer tops than women and bottoms, so gynocentrism vanishes
>men enjoy the benefits of service and obedience from their three partners
>bottoms don't have to worry about responsibility or decision making
>only men work; fewer people in the workforce means higher wages, better jobs
>also no more incompetent workers
>four people sharing a home, more affordable
>also more people among whom to divide housework
>still a closed, committed relationship, so none of the downsides of free love
Thus far no one has demonstrated to me why these benefits would be a bad thing.
Anticipating counterarguments:
>you're gay and this is just your fetish
Correct, but that doesn't make my logic less sound
>it's not my heccin wholesome tradcath relationship!!
Yeah, traditional marriage is working SO well for us. You only support it because you grew up with it.
>men should be masculine/I wouldn't personally want to be a bottom
We've brainwashed men into believing that they have to be dominant and manly or they're failures. Really, a man submitting to his partner is just as valid as a man who dominates.
>I don't want a boywife that's gay
Don't have sex with him, just make him do housework. He's your property you can do whatever you want with him.
Replies:
