There should really only be one answer, that is if we had the same thought process as foids.

>>81489287 (OP)
Left i want my sons to look normal

>>81489287 (OP)
right. now i'll wait for someone to tell me why i'm wrong

>>81489355
That should be the right choice if we lived in a normal world, but I fear that thing might actually be a man

>>81489287 (OP)
easily the left. right looks weird.

>>81489287 (OP)
Left. Right looks like she's on the spectrum or possibly a crossdresser, both probably.

>>81489287 (OP)
Something about girls who look like models is really uncanny to me. They don't turn me on at all. I strongly prefer the girl on the right, she looks like a human.

>>81489287 (OP)
Both faces are ugly so it comes down to which one has bigger tits and ass

>>81489529
Right, but let me guess its a man?

>>81489287 (OP)
Right, although left could put up a fight if she didn't have (((current year))) styling and makeup.

>>81489287 (OP)
left looks younger. youthfulness is attractive.

right looks younger. youthfulness is attractive.

>>81489287 (OP)
Left looks like a generic soulless plastic robot and thus fails to make my dick hard.

>>81489287 (OP)
right looks real cute man

>>81489529
This shows off their secondary sexual characteristics. What would an attractive female face look like to you?

Tally so far:
>Left
81489307
81489422
81489470

>Right
81489355
81489383
81489471
81489543
81489557
81489613
81489624
81489668

Kinda insane. Lefacial math wise left should be superior (like if you give this to some BP guy he'd give left 9.3 and right a 6 or sum) and if you gave an equivalent question to females they would all go for left. Yet most males prefer the cute girl on the right. Why do you robros think that is?

>>81489722
girl on the right being more cute and looking more relatable/ can sort of form opinions about possible personality. For me the girl on the left looks weird and unlike anyone I would speak to. Even the picture you showed looks like the girl on the bottom is completely different than who I am and I would never consider it while the top is like girls I know

>>81489287 (OP)
Both of them retard

>>81489287 (OP)
>>81489722
The model looks high maintenance, like she expects dinners and vacations and if you don't give her that lifestyle she'll find some other rich guy to provide it with so much as a look back. The girl on the right still probably demands certain things from a man due to the nature of being attractive, but not to the same extent. I can visualise myself cuddling on a chair with her, or baking together in a way that seems ludicrous for the model. Of course seeing as she's posting semi lewd selfies for attention on the internet we all know she's insufferable by default.

>>81489722
hear that incel-bros? maybe you can worry a little less about having a scientificly perfect face. not every girl wants chad and vice versa. why not settle for a 6 like her?

>>81489287 (OP)
right <3
>>81489722
she has a striking model face, it's more aesthetic and not as atractive to me like right
not saying left is ugly, I just prefer cute over model-like
>>81489798
projecton, just say she makes you insecure

>>81489809
I literally would settle for her idk who wouldn't

>>81489287 (OP)
name for the right?

>>81489812
I don't get insecure. If you took the same girl and put her in a trad wife sundress and a mixing bowl in her hand, smiling warmly I'd be all over her in a heartbeat.

>>81489722
>thin, small breasts
>thin, small breasts + small implants
Left/bottom has better facial structure and maybe marginally better body, but the ugly "mature" way she presents herself ruins it. Top/right is a cute girl.

>>81489722
>Why do you robros think that is?
widespread toxoplasmosis hence the preference for the picture with more catlike features

>>81489722
>Yet most males prefer the cute girl on the right. Why do you robros think that is?
i'd say that depends on the demographic you're asking, people here like the neotenous look of right more than the look of a woman with stronger facial features like the left or picrel

>>81489878
considering that toxoplasmosis is more common in non western countries that could be true

>>81489287 (OP)
>>81489287 (OP)
The pics aren't a fair comparison. It's way easier to look good in a situation like pic on the right (dimmer light, e-girl make up, probably young) than on more candid model pics.

Show us the right girl in a frame like Adriana on the left and she would get mogged into hyper space.

>>81489949
Sure but this one should be fair enough >>81489722

>>81489960
No, it's still in doors with a more smooth camera not a candid model pic. It's very easy for these "egirls" to look cute. You actually see what they look like in interviews in day light, red carpets, etc.

Adriana is a model, out on red carpets, day light, minimal editing and she would most likely totally destroy the egirl you posted if they stood next to each other in day light where you can't cake on egirl make up and look normal.

>>81490018
And here's the girl I posted without make up. That's not even outside though so the light is still isn't harsh.

>>81490018
nta but I don't understand what you're talking about. Both pictures of both women are quite obviously prepped and doctored to make the women as attractive (according to whose tastes I don't know) as possible. They're on even ground.

>>81490028
Even mediocre women can look hot with caked on egirl make up with smoothing light or their cameras, see >>81490026 and >>81490018

We've seen Adriana in literally every kind of situation outside raw and unfiltered. She's on another level.

>>81490028
>>81489960
And here's OP girl in an outside picture. Not saying she's ugly, but she's not a bombshell like Adriana and almost everyone would agree IRL unless it's your specific taste or you think pic related looks more attainable and that's why you prefer her.

>>81490039
wow the supermodel who 99% of normal men would say is more attractive is actually more attractive?

>>81490060
OP is using misleading pictures and comparisons. Most men are too retarded to understand this and they take it as face value thinking the girl on the right actually looks like that in person.

Hope this helps!

>>81489287 (OP)
right, even thought it has a cock

>>81490039
>"raw and unfiltered"
>every picture has ten pounds of makeup
>posts a jif with twenty pounds of makeup

>>81490086
we get it you can't tell what makeup looks like so you assume any woman with visible lashes must also be wearing foundation
also
>jif
ew

>>81490018
the question was simply left or right. stop sperging out. some people are generally put off by the face on the left, regardless of right's lighting, makeup, angle, etc.

>>81490086
She has way less make up than the egirls. Egirl make up doesn't even work IRL cause it looks that goofy and caked on.

And yes, being filmed from different cameras, from all angles, in different light is WAY more raw and unfiltered than what egirls do. Why are egirls just sitting in their room in front of their webcams and look ridiculous as soon as they go outside and someone else takes a photo of them? Does >>81490058 look remotely like the OP pic?

Keep coping.

>>81490102
No, the question wasn't just innocent. You presented a completely unrealistic picture of someone who does NOT look like that in person. And then you don't educate guys about this fact and most are dumb enough to take it as face value.

>>81489287 (OP)
Adriana Lima is one of the best looking women of all time. The only reason I wouldn't choose Adriana is because I'm not a billionaire with hunter eyes so I couldn't keep her.

>>81490116
that thousand dick stare

>>81490116
not op btw
you're still a fuckin freak tho

>>81490142
>educating people is being a freak
whatever helps you cope

>>81490142
lmao this whores simp got btfo and is triggered. She looks like absolute gutter trash compared to a beautiful woman retard.

>>81489287 (OP)
Honestly, neither one really does it for me.

>>81490058
https://www.tiktok.com/@ashisbees/video/7482242207223647519
Of course egirls fraud but that photo seems even more unreliable, in the first face you can't fraud hard enough to hide all that bloat. Unless you're editing hard but you be the judge of that.

Also anon is right it's not about the particular girl just the preference for cute faces over le high psl faces.

>>81490199
>preference for cute faces over le high psl faces

>>81490199
Find me a candid, unedited image of that girl where she actually looks like that. You can see the filters on her face in that image.

>>81490199
It's very easy to look good in your controlled setting. Even on TikTok these egirls who look good in their videos get blasted for what they look like when they get caught IRL.

I'm not saying these girls are ugly or not cute. They're fine. But they aren't as hot/cute in person as they look like in their carefully curated online presence (with filters) that generates them money and clicks.

>>81489287 (OP)
right because left is Br*zilian and we all know what happens with latinas once they pass 24 years of age. Don't even care that right is a troon.

>>81490229
Ho Lee Fuk, it's so easy for women nowadays. Women live life on tutorial island with a bot mode.

>>81490259
she's literally hacking though and should be banned

>>81490263
At least on games you can get banned for hacking, irl nothing will happen to her for making money off simps by frauding her appearance

>>81490229
>>81490259
Women have so many options to make themselves look pretty. They got:
>filters
>fakeup
>surgeries
Men have?
>surgeries

>>81490242
That was during her third pregnancy? Didn't she lose most of the weight shortly thereafter?

>>81490346
It's not a fair comparison because she's in her mid 40s now

>>81489287 (OP)
Right. Dude looks like a lady but........know what I mean?

>>81490346
>MUH PRAGANACAAAY
shut up hole. 99% of asia proves that you don't need to pig out and blow up into a lardass when you got a bun in the oven, it's just an excuse for bitches to become even more slothful and engage in gluttony without having to account for it.

>>81490399
Most 44 year old asian women aren't more attractive than Adriana at that age.

>inb4 cherrypicked pictures of the 1% of asian women who looks hot at 40-50

>>81489287 (OP)
Left because i have a weak chin and jaw and i wouldnt want my kids to suffer the same fate

>>81490399
I mean its one of the rare instances she took a break from walking runways so I see it similarly to a bodybuilder or other conditioned profession during their off-season. As much as men like to bitch I don't expect them to dehydrate themselves 24/7 just to have 8 pack abs or vascularity either since I recognize those as temporary peaks in controlled circumstances.

>>81490219
The whole thread is playing with that premise if you haven't realized
>There should really only be one answer, that is if we had the same thought process as foids.
>Lefacial math wise left should be superior (like if you give this to some BP guy he'd give left 9.3 and right a 6 or sum) and if you gave an equivalent question to females they would all go for left.

>>81490228
Judge by the video

>>81490229
You say that but you use even more unfair photos to prove she's mid or w/e. Anyone that believes this >>81490116
is accurate is as deluded as the simps that think girls don't fraud at all

>>81489287 (OP)
The left one is like a model and the right is trying hard to apply to the type of people here. I would pick the left one

>>81490480
>Judge by the video
You don't know filters work on videos nowadays?

>>81490480
>Anyone that believes this >>81490116 (You) is accurate is as deluded as the simps that think girls don't fraud at all

What do you mean, retard? It's literally her in a school picture. The only one she couldn't control. You think they edited her "uglier" in her school pic? LMAO.

>>81490504
Yes she has so many haters that they edited her school photo to make her uglier, also she lost like 90 pounds that's why she's a perfect qt 3.14 now

>>81490516
omg!! poor girl i cudnt believe it
JUSTICE FOR EGIRL NOW!11

>>81490489
If the filter is subtle enough as to where you can't tell it's probably not as bad as you're pretending it is.

>>81490504
You can find ugly images of almost anyone regardless of how attractive they are IRL but this is literally just outdated low res slop.

>>81490592
>Muh egirl looks bad it's fake

>>81490592
>pic from a year ago
>outdated low res slop

Ok, show us ONE video or picture of this girl that she didn't control herself then. Just one.
:^)

>>81490504
Looks like one of those slampigs that has 50+ bodycount in highschool

>>81490613
>Just post ONE video or picture from a girl you only know from social media otherwise the slop I posted somehow becomes accurate
Real gotcha. Like I said if you don't notice a filter it can't be that bad.

>>81490711
I can notice a filter immediately from how shitty and low resolution that image is. It's 2025 and I assume this whore has an iPhone, it can shoot in 4k in low light conditions with very decent detail almost similar to a dslr

Adriana Lima cause she also has a good personality.

>>81489287 (OP)
Men who are calling Adriana Lima a crossdresser are just insecure because she has more masculine features than them.

>>81490711
>zero pics outside of her content
>the one candid picture from a year ago from her university doesn't count!!!
ok nigga

>>81489613
Are you young yourself?

>>81490723
>Too low res! It's frauded
>>81490116
>Oh this one, perfectly accurate

>candid picture
Lmao

>>81490399
Tell me you have never been to asia without telling me. Most of when get fat after pregnancy, it's normal.

>>81490804
>candid
>truthful and straightforward

Yes, no filters, no control over her looks. It's candid. It's a normal university picture. And the full pic isn't low res.
Post one pic or video of her that she didn't upload herself bro. I'll wait.

>>81489383
Its his problem than, not yours

>>81490825
I already explained why both of those points are dumb it's getting boring hearing you repeat yourself

>>81490841
You don't even understand what candid means you fucking retard. It's as candid as it can be. Everyone looks the same. There's no angle frauding, filters, weird light.

>>81490804
bro youre legit below 90 iq

>>81489722
Id take the body of the lower one and the face of the upper one.

>>81489287 (OP)
Guys choose the right one cause of the style. Face wise she is 6-7 which is good but the left one has that high aesthetics style which doesnt work well for bots

>>81490858
again read prior posts

>>81489287 (OP)
Right is super cute to me.
>>81489722
Still top.

>>81490895
Again, you don't know what candid means.

>AHHHHHHHH NOT MY EGIRLERINO

>>81490908
you're gonna trigger the simp cuck

>>81490480
I believe low test women genuinely prefer low test men... still good looking but with feminine features as opposed to this

>>81489287 (OP)
Left but i choose right becasue im a bottom of the barrel male and bottom of the barrel males are intimidated by very good looking women a

>>81489287 (OP)
Left. My children would be mutts, but they would most likely be decently attractive mutts. Right has a fuckton of makeup, a big ass nose, and what appears to be a recessed chin. I'm good.

>>81490908
>AHHHHHHHH NOT MY WHORE TOP MODEL
>I'M GONNA SPAM THE SAME PICTURE OVER THE ENTIRE THREAD BECAUSE I'M SO ANGRY SOMEONE DARED TO SAY MY DEAREST TOP SLUT IS NOT AS GOOD LOOKING AS SOME RANDOM EGIRL
>I AM LITERALLY AND FIGURATIVELY SO ANGRY

>>81491060
I don't care about Adriana. I'm making fun of you defending a frauding e-girl like your life depends on it, faggot.

>>81489287 (OP)
Left, fun fact fact anon. Model Agency mostly choose Males with buzzcuts and female with really tight buns cause they can clearly see their imaculate facial features, mid-average looking people who looks good are mostly carried by covering half of their face with hair