>>81500633>What? No.>Well that's a compelling argument, I should've thought of that.>>Celibate monks are morally inferior to a serial rapist?>Celibate monks contribute nothing to the world. Fucking off into a monastery does not make the world a better place.The other guy that answered was not me.
Anyways, in the world I live in, one can be moral without achievements. At the same time be a depraved amoral monster and have a ton of achievements.
Thus, what you said just makes no sense. So, No.
Also, good to know that the serial rapist seems to be morally superior.
Again, no sense. Not to me or any of the people in my life.
Where do you live? Some places, like, say, India, can be drastically culturally different.