Are you content with your position in the entirely based on physical appearance post-modern pecking order?

i dont talk to people so im not in it

>>81507745 (OP)
I feel nothing, I feel nothing but pain and sadness.

>>81507745 (OP)
perhaps, if it means less trouble for me in the long run, but i would like 1 hot gf for my big fat chud ass self someday

>>81507745 (OP)
yes, I'm an attractive woman, I can't complain

>>81507745 (OP)
>entirely based on physical appearance
>post-modern
anon, it's always been this way.

>>81507787
What about the Habsburgs then? They were ugly af yet people did not dispute their rights to the HRE throne based on looks alone? Pretty privilege might have always existed, but it was probably 1/10th of its today's power prior to the invention of the TV. And the internet and social media was just the final nail in the coffin for ugly people.

>>81508259
i can easily answer you this: we don't live in a feudal system anymore

>>81508279
But do you agree that visual media has increased the value of physical appearance tenfold compared to 200 years ago? Napoleon was considered ugly, short (compared to the elite) and balding, yet he rose up through the ranks quite quick. James Madison wouldn't have written no American constitution and became president, if he lived today, cause he was 5'2. Brutal

Yes its my personality and autism that holds me back

>>81507745 (OP)
No I'm a sea monkey I'll never be happy with my look

>>81507745 (OP)
I forget, become confident, get reminded of my station, then withdraw

>>81508555
i mean you're not inherently wrong but these conversations weren't about political power, it's about the ability to attract a mate. hypergamy has always existed but nobody thinks it existed back then because it wasn't always apparent. nothing will convince me it doesn't go both ways.


that being said though, you're not wrong in saying that visual media has made it a million times worse.

>>81507745 (OP)
women get off to serving other women, they are all lesbians