Thread 81510038 - /r9k/ [Archived: 1101 hours ago]

Anonymous
6/16/2025, 2:20:12 PM No.81510038
IMG_20250616_091815_812
IMG_20250616_091815_812
md5: 8b50691c363ba2cd65e8271735d17156🔍
men should stop crying about "not being able to match" with girls.

now men have the option to message a girl EVEN IF SHE DOESN'T MATCH with them.

men have all the tools available, but would rather not pay up and use em so they can whine about how women "have it easier"
Replies: >>81510064 >>81510078 >>81510086 >>81510109 >>81510118 >>81510495 >>81510506 >>81510644 >>81510669 >>81510701 >>81510717 >>81510786 >>81510834 >>81511100
Anonymous
6/16/2025, 2:24:35 PM No.81510064
>>81510038 (OP)
I always but gold then refund after seeing my matches, fuck tinder
Anonymous
6/16/2025, 2:26:51 PM No.81510078
>>81510038 (OP)
So, if she doesn't even like you, you can now be annoying to her?
Anonymous
6/16/2025, 2:27:51 PM No.81510086
>>81510038 (OP)
This shit costs so much to pay for and it doesn't solve your problem at all, now you're uggo and visibly desperate.
Anonymous
6/16/2025, 2:32:07 PM No.81510108
Doesnt matter when the app is still developed in a way that's very gynocentric as far as selection process
that's 100% by design, and the CEO is female.
Anonymous
6/16/2025, 2:32:30 PM No.81510109
>>81510038 (OP)
Imagine being so retarded that you still use this failed concept called online dating to try to find love.
Replies: >>81510579
Anonymous
6/16/2025, 2:34:01 PM No.81510118
>>81510038 (OP)
where is the ethnicity filter for searching boys? i don't care about the height filter
Anonymous
6/16/2025, 3:24:05 PM No.81510495
171829
171829
md5: 0d871bc682cc5024a1b813658db372cd🔍
>>81510038 (OP)
>men have all the tools available,
Were is weight filter?
Anonymous
6/16/2025, 3:25:23 PM No.81510506
>>81510038 (OP)
>saar please match with me i beg you
who pays for this shit?
why is it even allowed
Anonymous
6/16/2025, 3:31:02 PM No.81510553
All of these seem like very basic features. This business model is immoral. Like cars coming with everything installed, but you have to pay extra after paying for the car to use the features it already has, like heated seats. The customer bought heated seats, everything related to it. But it was sold with stuff designed to prevent customer from using what he purchased. Unless he pays the ransomware fee of $6,000,000 to undo the malware they knowingly and intentionally installed on the product he bought. It's a weird disconnect between physical existence as an object and function of the object. Can you imagine how irredeemably evil and ugly one must be to think like that?
Replies: >>81510941
Anonymous
6/16/2025, 3:33:11 PM No.81510569
I tried Tinder Gold and everyone I was matched with was thousands of miles away
Also, girls just refuse to notice me in public.
Anonymous
6/16/2025, 3:34:48 PM No.81510579
>>81510109
What's the alternative? randomly approaching people when they clearly don't want to be bothered?
bar? they're with friends and don't want to be bothered
gym? they're working out and don't want to be bothered
In public? they have places to be and don't want to be bothered.
At work? they're working and don't want to be bothered.
It was an option back then because the internet didn't exist, nowadays you're a rapist if you dare exist within their space without explicit 1000% permission that can be revoked at any time.
Anonymous
6/16/2025, 3:40:26 PM No.81510598
I like to get banned from the platform immediately for being a bot because I'm not doing that shit manually
Anonymous
6/16/2025, 3:43:19 PM No.81510615
I might try dating apps if they had options for race, weight, age, tattoo, piercings, iq, etc. filters. Women use social media like a thousand times more than men. They could have a personality/sentiment analysis. Then you could filter by Ai analyzed traits determined from her social media posts. No argumentative women, foul mouthed, dishonest women.
But I guess that would mean users have to prioritize what they can settle without. If you put in bare minimum reasonable expectation; virgin, no tattoos, White, bmi <21, age <26, quiet, obedient, then you'd have zero women in a thousand mile radius meeting that.
Anonymous
6/16/2025, 3:47:10 PM No.81510644
>>81510038 (OP)
Men should man up and enjoy being used as cattle!
Do you read the shit you type or is self awareness a curse everyone else is forced to bear.
Anonymous
6/16/2025, 3:50:52 PM No.81510669
>>81510038 (OP)
>now men have the option to message a girl EVEN IF SHE DOESN'T MATCH with them.
That's even more pathetic. What's the appeal of acting like a desperate clown?
>men have all the tools available, but would rather not pay up and use em
It's called self-respect.
Anonymous
6/16/2025, 3:55:33 PM No.81510701
>>81510038 (OP)
What's the use of "see who likes you" if you've got unlimited likes? Preferably you'd only want to match with who you come across and find attractive yourself, right?
Anonymous
6/16/2025, 3:57:27 PM No.81510717
>>81510038 (OP)
anyone who uses tinder is extremely dumb, even dumber if you pay for it. only thing you're getting outta there are hookups if you're good looking.
Anonymous
6/16/2025, 4:07:25 PM No.81510786
>>81510038 (OP)
we should be allowed to rape foids, that would solve all our problems
Anonymous
6/16/2025, 4:14:56 PM No.81510834
>>81510038 (OP)
Isn't that what you can do on hinge for free?
Anonymous
6/16/2025, 4:33:26 PM No.81510941
>>81510553
Touched on the real important part.

In the past, if you needed to pay for a service you were basically paying out the material and labor cost of R&D and maintenance with a margin of profit. Shit like this just artificially limits the extent of the service without the associated cost also being reduced, in other words it's fraud. Such is the state of an industry (if you can call it that even) where competition is suppressed to the point it's non-existent, options are faked to fool the average consumer (all big dating apps are owned by the same company LOL, talk about monopoly)
>b-but the maintenance cost is actually the cost of the highest tier subscription, you're actually getting a more cost-effective service especially if you're a free user
Fucking bullshit that, they do that because you are the product, doubly so in the case of dating apps, without a userbase they wouldn't have the appeal. It would unironically be better for everyone to have all online dating behind a flat paywall. It still wouldn't solve the inherent problem of it being against their financial interests that you succeed, thus dropping out of the paying userbase, but it would be one step better. Also don't get me started on the privacy-disrespecting data-mining of the userbase.
There's just so much wrong with dating services as a whole, and they're allowed to get away with it because we're collectively regressing in social skills and are lonelier than ever before, so this dangling-the-carrot-on-a-stick that "you might find love here" without getting good at reading people actually clouds normies vision. It's pathological mass manipulation, and they're perfectly aware of it.

Anons, do not fall for this exploitative trap, keep trying at third places, I tried dance classes as a 25 year old khv, and it did get me an 18 year old gf in just a few months, unlike the thousands of hours wasted online chatting randos (including /soc/)
Anonymous
6/16/2025, 4:50:55 PM No.81511100
>>81510038 (OP)
>have to pay exorbitant prices for a CHANCE of a conversation
>still have to compete with dozens of men, most who are likely more attractive than you due to no fault of your own
>send message
>she ghosts you or convo is dry and it goes nowhere
fuck you