If a lot of men abstained from and abolished ALL gender roles, women will suffer from it as a result.

>>81538782 (OP)
No. You just need to stop giving money to women whether through taxes, manual labor, simping, donating to women's NGOs, complimenting them, talking to them, making eye contact to them, etc.
A complete boycott on women where anybody who doesn't follow it gets executed on spot would make them go insane on the first day. Now imagine if we did that for a year; it would eliminate at least 40% of women, but the ones who live will be perfect wives who will love and appreciate their future husband.

>>81538806
Yeah that's what i'm sayinn

Women want to criticize gender roles but only go half way.
In reality, gender roles perpetuate gynocentrism and the coddling of whores. The entirety of gender roles will have to be eradicated in order to unhinge gynocentrism from the collective soul

True equality will only be attained when the women rightfully suffer from social "neglect" and atomisation.

Let the women drown in a sea of porn-addicted rapemonkeys, neglect, atomisation, chinese artificial wombs and sexbots.

If half of the gender roles are disappearing then all of it shall disappear. That is true balance. "Sacred womanhood" was never an option.

>>81538782 (OP)
I don't have much to add to this thread, I just want to voice my support for a strike on women. It will never happen, but if men just stopped working women wouldn't appreciate any of the luxuries we provide for them (often without their knowledge)

>>81538782 (OP)
in the future, lifelike androids capable of producing human offspring will be real and then females will really get desperate