I've lost my faith, robots. Was Christ just a psyop all along?

>>81545163 (OP)
It was a lie to control you. You can be a good person without blind devotion to antiquated dogma.

>>81545163 (OP)
>Was Christ just a psyop all along?
Christ is an archetype you'll find through a bunch of cultures with some slight variations

>by David Icke

You missed /x/, homie.

>>81545208
>by David Icke
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FgAhX36WEPw

>>81545175
>good person
how do set your values?

You realise the only written documents of Aztecs we have were written by Catholic Conquistadors? All these "Jesus Christ is just a persian/egyptian/zoroastrian myth" arguments have been brought up and debunked like centuries ago. Every single criticism you can think of about Christianity has been thoroughly examined by men far smarter than you centuries before you were born. Ever heard of scholasticism?

>>81545232
>by men far smarter than you centuries before you were born
but did they had science? don't tell me people were smart back then if they didn't have the big bang theory

>>81545232

>Every single criticism you can think of about Christianity has been thoroughly examined by men far smarter than you centuries before you were born.

You mean destroyed. That's why Orthodoxy had to suppress Marcion's "Antithesis" and any other such "heretical" media that might poke holes in Cucktianity.

Riddle me this, Batman... Pic-related would also indicate that God could exist as an evil being that enslaves us in so-called "heaven".

>>81545243
You know the Big Bang theory was developed by a Catholic priest, right? And that for decades the secular scientists tried to deny it because the Big Bang goes in line with Christian theology. At the time the scientific dogma was tha the universe always existed, but the Big Bang pinpoints the beginning at a single event... A sinfle "creation". So yes. Christians have always had "science". Most of the greatest minds of all time have been Christian, and the hoax that Christendom hindered science is a Jewish Hollywood lie peddled through pop culture for the past 60-70 years.

>>81545300
>refutation
>schizo gibberish posing as logical analysis

>>81545222
Treat others the way I want to be treated.

>>81545329
that was the joke, nigga, imagine I posted a 'jak with that
>>81545336
is that all?

>>81545332

>I'm going to pretend I can't parse good English because I lost

>>81545300
No. Core doctrine of Christianity is that man's essence of being is in God, and man is currently in a fallen state, removed from God. Therefore, when man is reunited with God, man's being is fulfilled to its original state. You just defined a doctrine completely separate from Christianity, where
1) man exists wholly separate from God
2) man cannot refuse God (you can, and are destroyed wholly and eternally)
So you either don't understand the theology you're attempting to disprove or you're just being weaselly and disingenuous

>>81545359
>good English
You're confirming my suspicion that you're agreeing with the pic because it seems logical and rational Seems is the keyword.

>>81545300
>>81545379
Plus, an implication is not a definition. And all that your picture proves is that you created an axiomatically contradictory set of definitions. It's as if you said
AXIOM: 1 EXISTS AND 2 EXISTS
AXIOM: 1 IS NOT 2
AXIOM: 1 IS 2
Ha! Contradiction! I'm smart

>>81545379
>>81545386
>>81545406
>no reply
peculiar

>>81545379

>man exists wholly separate from God

Cite where I explicitly make this claim or what specifically has indicated to you that such a claim was being implicitly made.

>man cannot refuse God (you can, and are destroyed wholly and eternally)

So you are arguing for free will then? I implore you to point to the part of the physics and chemistry underlying the human brain that supports your claim that man cannot refuse God.

>man is currently in a fallen state, removed from God

This is true but only to a degree which was diminished when the temple veil was torn asunder at the moment of Christ's death. Believers are said to be sealed with the Holy Ghost which grants them a ticket to the heaven, "New Heaven", mentioned in the image.

>So you either don't understand the theology you're attempting to disprove or you're just being weaselly and disingenuous

I understand it just fine. I have read the entire Bible and explored its many different angles of possible exegesis.

>>81545386
>>81545406
>>81545475

And you say I'm schizo. New Heaven is a concept that is outlined in the Bible in the way that the picture presented. There is no axiomatic contradiction on my end but on Christianity's.

>>81545163 (OP)
there are some serious critiques of christianity/jesus himself, but david icke is not the way to go, OP.

>>81545336
I want to be raped by a hot woman

Let me present the guy who wrote the book you are quoting: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HAbI_1ySbCY
I'm going to assume Quetzalcoatl stuff is made up bullshit, until you provide primary sources for his claims.

>>81545163 (OP)
I asked ChatGPT what it thought about Jesus earlier today

>>81546015
Replying to myself: It is natural that the Indians would know about the flood, as they too are descendants from Noah.

>>81545300
Hint: Check your definitions.

>>81546015

>primary sources for his claims

Just use AI and explore its citations.

>>81545966
Getting raped by a woman doesn't mean she'll rides you while you
>please, don't. I dont wanna cuummmmmm
She'll probably drug you, steal all your money, leave you somewhere stranded, and you won't remember any of it.

>>81547072
Idgi, but I wouldnt treat her to being drugged, mugged, and left for dead in the wild. Thats not treating others like they would treat me.

>>81545163 (OP)
>manipulation
Yeah right, a foreigner capable of changing everything arrives and he just happens to have plumes on his helm, yeah right, this is not just a prophecy coming true it's manipulation, yeah right.

>Bunch of shit about the Atlantean empire
Why is this thread getting replies?

>>81547641
It's different than the normie gay/fag/troon/sissy/relatonships threads.

>>81548551

The guy you replied to probably posted those threads and is wondering why they're not getting any traction.

>>81545163 (OP)
>trusting David Icke
ngmi