Foids are getting nervous about war - /r9k/ (#81545856) [Archived: 985 hours ago]

Anonymous
6/19/2025, 11:13:37 PM No.81545856
161117
161117
md5: 928df0bf1ed7177688dd26d0a3b22e41🔍
>But the incels HAVE to fight our wars for us so we can continue working fake jobs and fucking Chad tehee!!!

https://www.youtube.com/shorts/AFLGv8bRDE0
Replies: >>81545877 >>81545887 >>81546138 >>81546201 >>81546247 >>81547517 >>81547676
Anonymous
6/19/2025, 11:14:54 PM No.81545877
>>81545856 (OP)
Everyone who has ever had sex has to go to war.
Women included.
Those who have not get to stay home
Replies: >>81546385
Anonymous
6/19/2025, 11:15:42 PM No.81545887
>>81545856 (OP)
>Men used to fight in war
Drafts are super modern. Farmers were too useless for wars, too necessary for keeping the foodsupply going and were only good for defending their own village. Prehistoric tribes were dependent on men and wouldnt waste their men willy nilly.
Replies: >>81545939
Anonymous
6/19/2025, 11:20:19 PM No.81545939
>>81545887
>Farmers were too useless for wars

Most pre-industrial societies were 90%+ farmers. Even when America was founded 95% f the people who lived there were farmers. Basically all armies from before the modern age were made up of farmers. Only officers might have been from other professions.
Replies: >>81545968 >>81546115
Anonymous
6/19/2025, 11:23:00 PM No.81545968
>>81545939
It doesn't change the fact that a good majority of people did not participate in wars of any kind throughout history. Only in modern times the concept of drafting your entire able bodied populace became a thing
Replies: >>81546050
Anonymous
6/19/2025, 11:31:11 PM No.81546050
>>81545968
Do you have any evidence for that? I'm not dying for Israel

Also it is irrelevant. 99.999% of people who fight wars are men. Drafts are not modern, they have always been a thing, and they basically exclusively target men. If we go to war it will be men who will have to bear the cost, not women. But men don't want to, and you can't really make them. The rostie fears this simple truth.
Replies: >>81546178 >>81546194
Anonymous
6/19/2025, 11:38:17 PM No.81546115
>>81545939
>What are the ministerialis
They werent, it was too expensive. America was a modern society and even they relied on professional armies more than farmers, aside from the revolution. Even that is more in line with what I said about farmers defending their own village.
Replies: >>81546172
Anonymous
6/19/2025, 11:40:30 PM No.81546138
1730879257485648
1730879257485648
md5: d8a432f2298825d4eeaaa98c708e76bd🔍
>>81545856 (OP)
>do I look like I could fight in a war?
Yes. Get in the fucking van.
Replies: >>81546159
Anonymous
6/19/2025, 11:43:58 PM No.81546159
pointingatguy
pointingatguy
md5: 97db03ca0da53a14489dec091e6c8c5a🔍
>>81546138
Posting s*yjack images should be an immediate ban and have a hit sqaud sent to your house.
Replies: >>81546206
Anonymous
6/19/2025, 11:45:12 PM No.81546172
>>81546115
To tack onto this
>the Assize of Arms of Henry III makes it very clear that unarmed serfs were not expected to leave the fields and fall into ranks. The men being levied were armed, had some training, and came from the upper peasantry: sokemen (later yeomen), tenants farmers, and the like.
Serfs were like 90% of the population.
Drafting your farmers was akin to trying to invoke famine. The time they are away from the fields is unproductive, a dead man is useless.
The same applied for continental europe and this stayed the norm till napoleonic times basically.
Anonymous
6/19/2025, 11:45:52 PM No.81546178
>>81546050
We really don't need a draft in America assuming we don't do something full retard like try to occupy China. Our military is based on bombing people from literally beyond the horizon.
Replies: >>81546238
Anonymous
6/19/2025, 11:47:57 PM No.81546194
>>81546050
Yes.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lev%C3%A9e_en_masse
Levee en masse or conscription was introduced as an idea in 1793. It was a novel idea, but the French Revolution involved everyone
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Total_war
It's an element of Total War
Total war is a type of warfare that includes any and all (including civilian-associated) resources and infrastructure as legitimate military targets, mobilises all of the resources of society to fight the war, and gives priority to warfare over non-combatant needs.
Most historical wars were not Total Wars
Anonymous
6/19/2025, 11:48:33 PM No.81546201
>>81545856 (OP)
>Look at this opinion I found. I've decided everyone I don't like also thinks this way because I'm a massive faggot
uh huh
Anonymous
6/19/2025, 11:49:03 PM No.81546206
1741914191290084
1741914191290084
md5: a98543d73ae8168624659523102ad0d5🔍
>>81546159
In the van. Now.

We are going to fight side by side to protect our Fellow Americans and our way of life.

Your ovaries do not absolve you from your duty to serve the greater good.
Replies: >>81546475
Anonymous
6/19/2025, 11:53:24 PM No.81546238
>>81546178
>Our military is based on bombing people from literally beyond the horizon.
Are you aware of the realities of modern battlefields? This isn't the 90s anymore.
Replies: >>81546268
Anonymous
6/19/2025, 11:53:51 PM No.81546247
>>81545856 (OP)
>I've had a good time with my homeboys
>but all good things must come to an end
>They can't start drafting women
the foid mindset is brootal
Anonymous
6/19/2025, 11:55:28 PM No.81546268
>>81546238
>send drone swarm to bomb the browns
>the browns send a drone swarm to bomb us
>both sides die helplessly crying in a ditch
Replies: >>81546405
Anonymous
6/20/2025, 12:08:32 AM No.81546385
>>81545877
Pity sex doesn't count obviously ?
Replies: >>81546475
Anonymous
6/20/2025, 12:09:39 AM No.81546405
1739220345703441
1739220345703441
md5: 3870804d405a369af00e4a49b3e47531🔍
>>81546268
That's one thing, but modern anti-air missile systems made it basically impossible to establish air dominance over a region. Aircraft is mostly used to deliver long range missiles and glider bombs from a safe distance. Boots on the ground would be needed more than ever, as someone has to operate the fiber optic drones with limited range and someone has to hold positions and move equipment otherwise it's not even occupied territory. There would be a lot more infantry on infantry combat than they had in the 90s when you could have absolute control of the skies.

Drafting women isn't a joke or a meme either, it's seriously under consideration in Ukraine, Israel is already doing it although they didn't YET deploy them in combat roles and democrats were pushing for it hard last year. Almost every democrat in congress voted to include women in the selective service and some republican voices also supported the notion.
In the past, women were exempt from service due to the realities of human reproduction, but nowadays most women don't have children so they're going to keep probing at this taboo until they get what they want.
Anonymous
6/20/2025, 12:16:38 AM No.81546475
>>81546206
>Your ovaries
fuck does that even mean?

>>81546385
well how was it pity?
Replies: >>81547420
Anonymous
6/20/2025, 1:49:01 AM No.81547420
>>81546475
You retard he means the fact you can have kids doesn't absolve you from your responsibility to society. Either get back in the kitchen or we are sending you to the trenches. You wanted equality, its your choice.
Anonymous
6/20/2025, 2:02:38 AM No.81547517
>>81545856 (OP)
Women are out performing men in every field, it's a no brainer they should be doing the fighting.
Men only out perfom women at suicide which isn't what you want in a soldier.
Anonymous
6/20/2025, 2:27:45 AM No.81547676
Screenshot_20250619-202454
Screenshot_20250619-202454
md5: cb782366917cf926ebf3a33fb11ef0c8🔍
>>81545856 (OP)
So, onto a more intellectually stimulating discussion, would you fuck this chink despite her being a furfag and having a man voice?
I would. I'd probably wife her.