>>81564724 (OP)Because it's the main way men can get an advantage in sexual relationships nowadays.
More needs to be said as to why it became so popular.
The first reason is the paucity of socially acceptable groups to hate. Every society has its outcasts. In the modern occident, there is only one such sizeable group: paedophiles. Since the function of these rituals is not literally about groups, but taboos, you can twist the logic. It doesn't matter that being attracted to 17-year olds is not paedophilia.
Secondly, I will offer something in the way of an apology, as the preaching to the choir is annoying. Maybe you disagree with these values, but at least understand these are also humanistic concerns. Starting in the late 19th century, the occident became very concerned with sexual harm, to the point that it outpaced the value of purity. Following that, feminism gained traction, demanding that women receive (some of) the privileges of men. One of the nascent privileges of the 20th century is the right to a middle class life. To have financial independence, you need your own source of income. This came at the right time as two huge global conflicts, which spurred the entry of women into the labour force. Nonetheless, cultural pushback against this remained. There is perhaps no greater symbol against this way of life than the pregnant teenager. It also helped that at this time, the occident started realising that what it considers sexual abuse is widespread. It made its mission to bring it to a minimum, and this it did. However, these kinds of relationships never completely, and cannot end. What concurrently went on since 2007 is more job insecurity, less social mobility, and so on. Another factor is the ballooning of student debt. When you have no material reasons, you switch to the psychological.
>>81564746No we already decided eugenics is bad
But yes, many radical feminists say heterosexual sex under patriarchy is rape.
>>81564749Contempt
>>81564766Yep