Do you think any x group is 100% likely anything y just because they are x

Sorry. You are an idiot then. Correlation =/= causation idiot.

So many black and white thinking robots. Brains allergic to nuance are low IQ. Also why you're a pathetic loser.

On some level I am aware that my virulent racism is unreasonable, but I just hate niggers too much to stop

>>81575774 (OP)
There are plenty of cases where causation exists. For example, 100% of transexuals are mentally ill

>>81575774 (OP)
enjoy your nigger gang rape faggot

>>81575818
Mentally ill is too broad of a term

>>81575774 (OP)
If by 100% more likely you mean twice as likely, then yes even more than twice even for some things. If by 100% you erroneously mean the totality of the group does x then no

>>81575878
Unlike the hips of a tranny

>>81575774 (OP)
if you are human you have 100% masterbaited

check mate atheists

c:

>>81575774 (OP)
no. But what are the odds genetics plays 0% into the factors that cause them to do things?

>>81575774 (OP)
>>81575813
>Correlation =/= causation
Correlation does not necessarily mean causation, but if the correlation holds until random chance becomes a virtual statistical impossibility then there is a link, which may well be causation.

Now read what I have said, actually think about it and come up with some kind of logical argument explaining how it is wrong and why I am an idiot.

>>81575774 (OP)
I don't think in groups, except to insult someone. I think in individuals. Anyone who seriously sees different people as a group is a neurodivergent retard.

>>81575774 (OP)
Aw the ESL is so cute

>>81575921
>Now read what I have said, actually think about it and come up with some kind of logical argument explaining how it is wrong and why I am an idiot.
OP himself is a retard because he conflated 2 points into the post:
>outliers/exceptions to a rule exist.
>correlation != causation
The first point is true and directly supports his point on black and white thinking, the second has absolutely nothing to do with it.

>>81575964
Thinking in groups is an extension of broader stereotyping/pattern recognition behaviour. You are evolved to evaluate individual elements (people or otherwise) from an initial position that matches the stereotype, then adjust accordingly as specific information for that individual element becomes available.
>water is good and quench thirst. this water brown, maybe not quench thirst but make sick
>blacks commit disproportionate violent crime. this black has a suit and a respectful demeanour, maybe he won't stab me for the money in the till but instead perform a legal purchase

>>81575921
I dont think you're an idiot for taking strong correlations into account as virtually the same as causations. I do the same. An example would be tall asian men being obviously a known rarity. Im saying people are idiots for taking mild correlations as causations. An example of that would be some femanon who said all men don't feel bad after hookups and all women do. Gender is a large x variable being 50% of the world's population, this makes for very weak correlations. R9k is nothing but all men this and all women that.

>>81576001
I drink brown muddy water. Never got sick because of it.

>>81575774 (OP)
>So many black and white thinking robots. Brains allergic to nuance are low IQ. Also why you're a pathetic loser.
You're just a psude. It's not that complicated.

Corrilation implies 5 things:

1.) A causes B
2.) B causes A
3.) C causes both A and B.
4.) A and B corrilate due to coincidence
5.) The data is bad or skewed

These are comprehensive but not mutually exclusive. If you can rule out coincidence and bad data, then corrilation must imply some kind of causation, backward, forward, or from something else, or a mix.

Either way, I'm sick of progressives always excusing their nonsense with "nuance" because they're afraid of people having thought crimes. There's "nuance" so we just need to take their side and let the government and academia think for us in ways that are really not that hard. It undercuts democracy to go after people for thinking for themselves under the excuse of "nuance".

Telling people "It's too complicated. Trust us, bro" doesn't help people think for themselves and is especially bad when it's not really that complicated. "Nuance" is used as a shield against people who have "harmful thoughts"(thought crimes) that are true but disruptive, and the shield justifies itself because there are genuinely people out there who never bother learning the basics(or are deprived of learning the basics because it's too complicated) and we all have to suffer because of them.

I hate conservitves because they're outright stupid and don't give a shit about people. But I hate progressives even more because they're extremely manipulative for the same call to power and money as conservatives. Nobody sees anybody as humans these days, just bodily hosts for various harmful beliefs. I hate it.