WheatWaffles did it again

>>81584407 (OP)
How's that grifter doing? Haven't watched anything by him in a few years, after I realized that the blackpill is inaccurate.

>>81584407 (OP)

Maybe he has to pay rent. I don't know why he's tickling our balls with this "I'M GONNA PULL OUT FOR GOOD" type shit anyway. He literally is carrying the torch FACEandLMS left behind.

>>81584407 (OP)
>spitting the must basic facts about reality is needed because people are subhuman iq in 2025
wowasa

>>81584420
>after I realized that the blackpill is inaccurate.
proofs?

>>81584420
the blackpill is merely the truth about reality, however as reality is moldable to some extent, it's not "set in stone"
"incel ideology" of what the blackpill is, is not real
reality however is real
however, retards, subhumans and many the likes can't comprehend fine nuance and thus can't understand or grasp such topics fully
and we are left with subhuman interpretations

>>81584426
refer to the point above
if you don't understand you are low iq subhuman scum

>>81584426

>LE BLACKPILL IS HECKIN' WRONG

he's either an idiot or trolling. you don't lurk these spaces without having the blackpill shoved down your throat against your will.

>>81584426
Scientific publications on human attraction by people like professor David Buss. Even WheatWaffles himself realized it after trying to debate it many times and started to bend the blackpill to the point that it's not really blackpill anymore and is just the redpill. Compare his old videos with his newer ones. Much different stance.

>>81584407 (OP)
Guys if I made a channel like dbdr talking about my life as a 27 yo khhv would you guys watch it? I have a channel with 12k subs but unrelated so I think I'll start a new one.

>>81584433
>the blackpill is merely the truth about reality
Not really. That's like saying "marxism is the truth about reality". It's an ideology that makes specific claims, so trying to label is as simply "the truth" is inaccurate. But I think you agree with this, you just have a private definition of the blackpill.

>>81584443

>what is politicized science?

You're joking, right? Modern science is pozzed and bends over backwards for women all fucking day. If going to college didn't clue you into that, I don't know what to tell you.

>>81584443
the blackpill also postulates most of dating nowadays happens online, through dating apps in particular, and thats where looks truly all that matters

>>81584461
If you can't trust the most reliable mechanisms for determining what's true about the world, then you really have no leg to stand on when asserting the blackpill claims, since you have no good evidence to back them up. It goes both ways. You can't pick and choose. "Oh this paper is reliable because it agrees with me, and this other one that disagrees is politicized and unreliable, because it disagrees with me". Fuck off with that.

the real blackpill is that even if you are attractive, female attention and sex doesn't ultimately make you much happier
dating isn't like hollywood movies. Women don't want romance or to actually get to know you.
They can love you one day and then get the ick tomorrow. That kind of fickleness isn't conducive to any kind of genuine life satisfaction.

>>81584453
>Not really.
yes really that is what is supposed to be the definition, raw reality only
however, incels twisted blackpill into "LDAR-ideology" (false)

>>81584474

There's no picking and choosing here. Science is an institution. You can compartmentalize and separate science as an institution from the actual practice of science itself. I would not make the argument that science is the end-all-be-all of truth either because scientists (academics) are not exactly known for being the most in touch as that entire world of academia carries its own ecosystem with its own respective inertia.

>>81584476
>female attention and sex doesn't ultimately make you much happier
speak for yourself
for a first time in 15 years my first thought every morning wasn't suicide
i thought i was so back, of course i was wrong but at least there is some hope now
>They can love you one day and then get the ick tomorrow
i can forgive her if she just takes me back

>>81584484
No, that's not "the definition". For example, claims about genetics entirely determining your attractiveness are foundational to the blackpill. If I show you a paper that disputes that, and you accept it, then that's not the blackpill anymore. I'll give you that the redpill claims to be about the truth first and foremost (at least in theory, not in practice), and its specific claims can adapt to what the best evidence points to, but that's the redpill, not the blackpill.

>>81584488
I don't think you know what "institution" means. But that's tangential an unimportant. My critique of your stance is, that if you reject scientific evidence, then you have no good evidence to support the blackpill. So believing in it is irrational. It goes both ways.

>>81584515

Okay. It took you decades to accept germ theory. It will likely be the same here, especially now that women are in academia.

>>81584531
I don't think you understood my criticism. I suggest that you reread it.

>>81584502
>claims about genetics entirely determining your attractiveness are foundational to the blackpill.
here in lies the nuance that incels can't understand

redpill ideology is cope trying to subvert the black pill knowledge that you can break the blackpill, if not referring to politics and the jq that is

this is what it means now a days literally

>>81584572
Whatever you think the blackpill is isn't the blackpill. You can cope and seethe about it, but it doesn't make it any less true.

grifter grifter grifter

Blackpill and redlill refer to understanding the conditions of the universe and it's mechanisms, it has nothing to do with women

>>81584474
Social sciences consist largely of made up terms and phenomena.

>>81584443
>Scientific publications on human attraction by people like professor David Buss.
Summarize what he had to say

>>81584407 (OP)
Retarded faggot grifter, his content is only valuable to people that have fetishized being suboptimal, grow the fuck up and go talk to women. You'll never be perfect, stop coping. If you aren't happy being imperfect or having an imperfect woman, then it's strictly a pride issue, and you have forged your own chains.

"waah waaaah why can't i be chad" Oh, how I've grown to detest you types.

>>81586665
It was kind of funny seeing Wheat Waffles evolve his view from 'it's over' to pulling girls who were into gingers in a night club overseas.

>>81584437
big bvll cock

>>81586665
JUST B URSELF AND TAKE 100 SHOWERS

>>81584474
>most reliable mechanisms for determining what's true about the world
I would trust them when it comes to semiconductors or technology. I don't trust them when there is a political reason to lie. And the best proof not to trust them is how trannyism is now encouraged instead of being correctly classified as a mental illness that shouldn't be encouraged.

>>81584407 (OP)
Anons, honestly, there could've been a lot you could've done to be on top of the social hierarchy and be chased by girls. If you actually started self improving at age ~13 you would get somewhere. Of course, at age ~20, it's kinda pointless, maybe you'll fuck a girl who's had 10s of dicks in her 5 years later. A superpower that goes far beyond looks is the ability to think rationally.

>>81587582
Trannyism is encouraged because every young woman and man neutered is not a threat to the oligarchy.

>>81584407 (OP)
Yikes I didn't know he had stepped up his grifting this much. When I still watched him in like 2023 he only did face ratings, which of course are a total grift too as obviously anyone who is truly blackpilled knows where he stands based on the way he's treated. But now he's selling all sorts of other shit like looksmaxxing advice that supposedly can improve you by 2 points in 24 hours? Fuck that white hamza retard.

>>81584452
Dew it.

Still hating (((them))) cause of Holy dbdr