women who breed with impulsive subhumams or breed despite being subhuman filth should not deserve human rights and should be treated just as bad as pedophiles are. You're telling me a kid with shit genes won't illicit the same result as if they were raped? especially raised in an unstable household? reproductive rights are retarded especially when another life will be affected by it. any anti eugenicist should be forced to look after any dysgenic that government throws at them if they want us to be alive so badly, you want morals and ethics? become a martyr for your cause or fuck your ethics

women not breeding with ugly incel types is eugenics. Please let your inferior beta genes fade into obscurity. Let this cursed existence end with you

>>81605616 (OP)
Just use a reversible sterilization at the onset of puberty. If a couple wants a kid, they will have to partition the government and prove that they have the income and are fit to become parents.

>>81605616 (OP)
I actually don't understand why eugenics is controversial. I think it's just because women are so bad at choosing who should pass on their genes and they don't want to mate with the men who actually deserve it.

Cool, how about we start that with you, OP. You seriously think you are the exception?

>>81605696
lol who are these deserving men? You?
I think they're doing a pretty good job filtering out all the incel genes out of the pool

>>81605616 (OP)
Who decides what genes deserve to be passed on? And how can you prove they do ?

>>81605707
how about men who aren't sub-80 IQ and routinely abandon them and their babies LOL
pay the toll foid!!

>>81605616 (OP)
>impulsive subhumams
You're subhuman, though

>>81605733
how about ugly lonely weirdos with piss poor social skills and multiple mental health issues?
I don't think any sane eugenicist would want your genes being passed around

>>81605616 (OP)
Women rarely breed with subhumans only in very harsh lack of resources or forced by cultures, the only reason theres subhumans is because subhuman women reproduce, as plenty of men will tap anything. Subhuman males get naurally expelled by women thats why women reproduce way more than men statistically

>>81605687
and dysgenic foids will still breed continuing this curse that's why I want to hold them responsible as well

>>81605693
not a bad idea, puberty is shit for anyone anyway.

>>81605699
why do you think I included myself in the subhuman category, read dumbest

>>81605714
people who study genealogy and biology, and policies or a code of conduct.

>>81605696
that's why those women should have their tube's tied

>>81605707
low iq midwits and mentally ill "people" surely aren't contributing to the incel births at all, but keep defending that surely and wonder why the people you dislike being born still exist. self awareness is immaculate

>>81605687
>women not breeding with ugly incel types is eugenics.
In a sense, you're right because in the real world they're not breeding with anybody. All the hateful dykes are willingly removing themselves from the gene pool. I'm not complaining.

>>81605772
>Completely ignores his valid point to strawman and seethe

>>81605772
My genes are magnificent, don't hate me 'cause you ain't me

>>81605806
>calls a strawman a valid point

real intelligent

>>81605815
You're arguing women aren't reproducing with deadbeat men?

>>81605825
I'm saying they are, just because they are superior in the eyes of nature doesn't mean they are worthy of being considered human. That's why niggers more times than not end up behind bars and need laws and police state to regulate their behaviors

>>81605796
>people who study genealogy and biology, and policies or a code of conduct.

And how would they prove said genes are bad and don't serve an important purpose?

What's stopping them from being biased?

I'm assuming they also be forced to practice eugenics on themselves?

>>81605902
Then you actually agree with the person you were arguing against...

>>81605687
plenty of subhumans reproduce.

I have never in my life understood why eugenics is supposedly a bad thing, and I'm pretty fucking libertarian.

>>81605962
irrelevant, they have more of an opinion than people that don't. There should be basic rules set in place before that is obvious as a structure before. And certain things are approved through a committee much like a senate.

>>81605972
no, their ideal eugenics is based around nature and is one sided

>>81605687
It's not that she doesn't breed ugly. She doesn't breed poor. It's not looks dumb ass its viability of life. That's why fat kikes porn all the girls out. Fucking idiot.

>>81606030
>approved through a senate

So a group of people who can easily be bought off for specific interests or reasons ultimately would be the ones deciding what genes should or should not be passed.

And what kinds of basic rules?

>>81606058
>So a group of people who can easily be bought off for specific interests or reasons
I'm tired of this. We can't have anything because someone might be corrupt.

If we're already at that level where geneticists and medical doctors are getting bribed, then fuck it. Eugenics isn't worth it. We're too stupid, useless, and greedy to get anything accomplished. Let's just let the dumbest people on Earth raise the population by another 1 billion each year and see all the great things it'll do for us.

>>81605616 (OP)
Really, we don't even need to go all in. There's not need to force anyone to get sterilized or anything extreme. We just provide incentives to high-risk demographics not to have kids. Like, if you're from a single parent, welfare-dependent home, you get a voucher for a four year college degree if you get permanently sterilized. Or you get a check for $50k or something like that.

Even if we could reduce the population of dysgenic tards by 15%, that would be a win. This is coming from a dysgenic tard btw.

Foids with shit genes need to be culled from the gene pool too. They're mostly to blame for why inkwells even exist.