>>81628902I am unable to articulate it well. Technically anyone can get forgiveness, the two men crucified next to Christ is a shining example. One accepted and one rejected. The difference was heaven and hell.
What I'm trying to say flirts with determinism. The ones who would ask for forgiveness are not the immoral ones, at least not in the sense of the term in how we are using it in this exchange(as opposed to the concept of inherited sin through Eve and For all have sinned, and come short of the glory of God).
What you are putting forth is an interesting opposite example of the argument I usually see. How can a just and moral god damn wickedness? The argument is fundamentally incorrect, as humans are fallible and determining what is good or just is beyond the ability of humans, and God alone determines what is good on a fundamental and definitional level. This is where faith comes, it fills the gap for these kinds of how can she slap situations. It feels like a cop out, and faith is a spiritual gift that not everyone receives in equal measure. It is actually one I struggle with a lot. I try to live piously, but it feels more like a set of mental rules pieced together by personal conviction that happens to correlate with scripture. I can feel good and evil, but I'm not so good at faithing anything.
I kind of like the deist ideas of God as goldsmith or clockmaker. Things are set in motion and everything can be reduced to action reaction, like the laws of physics.
Back to how can God be good if hell, I believe the answer is uncomfortably simple. Hell was never meant for man. The angels rebellion and the fall of man are closely tied. As an ultimate good, evil can not exist in the presence of God. Hell as destination unfortunately happens to be the furthest possible distance away from God, a complete absence of his essence. Like turning a light on in a dark room, where does the darkness go? It simply can't be at all in the presence of light.
I hope this makes sense.