Women are a eugenic force, gatekeepers of reproduction. They want a tall man? Because a tall man is stronger and more dominant. They want a handsome man? Good looks signal good genetics.
Incels are wrong, women are right. Just admit you lost the generic lottery.
main problem here is that humans got as far as we did by being smart but since women are just going to fuck literal room temp iq drug addicts with 5 baby mommas then that bears bad news i think
>>81629715 (OP)That's fine and I agree but then society asks why I am not participating at the same time.
Women don't care about eugenics, that's for retards
>>81629715 (OP)the sad part is that there are people that actually believe graphs like this.
>>81629773Yesterday, two femoids were discussing their boyfriend. They mentioned their height (over 6 feet both) and large penises. I am a 5'9" manlet no wonder women ignore me.
>>81629715 (OP)that's literally not true nobody wants a 11 inch penis it would never fit in literally anyone
>>81629786> boyfriendsFix. Also, those femoids are my "colleagues".
>>81629767Eugenics are based but women don't really apply it to themselves. Only men and even then they are not aware of it.
>>81629715 (OP)They arent eugenic in the slightest as two guys can be the same physical stats but the more bloodthirsty and psychotic of this pair always gets more female attention.
>>81629809>the more bloodthirsty and psychoticMen shouldn't' be pussies.
>>81629715 (OP)Then why don't they actually have children?
The statement oversimplifies human attraction and reproduction, leaning on outdated eugenics ideas that don't hold up under scrutiny. Women, like men, vary widely in their preferences-height, looks, or other traits aren't universal dealbreakers. Attraction is shaped by biology, culture, and individual experiences, not just a quest for "superior" genetics. The "eugenic force" framing ignores how social factors, like status or confidence, often outweigh physical traits in mate choice.
The jab at incels is harsh but misses the mark. It's not about admitting a "genetic loss" but recognizing that self-perception and social skills heavily influence romantic success. Blaming women or genetics dodges the real issue: rigid thinking and resentment don't help anyone. People can improve their appeal through effort-confidence, fitness, or emotional intelligence-regardless of their starting point. The statement's black-and-white view ignores that complexity.
>>81629858 The statement contains kernels of evolutionary truth but twists them into a bitter, oversimplified narrative. It's unhelpful to view dating as a zero-sum genetic competition-that mindset only fuels alienation. Healthy relationships are built on more than just biology.
That has been debunked, sweetheart
>>81629858>>81629867AI is trying to rebuke the blackpill and fails.
>>81629831Who said the other guy was a nice person? Oh your subhuman femoid instincts did, thats right if a guy aint a psycho who is gonna kill you and rape you hes clearly a nice guy wuss who isnt worth breeding with
GOD
I
FUCKING
HATE
WOMEN
SO
MUCH
>>81629715 (OP)uh im pretty certain the circumference is wrong. go by condom sizes for circumference
>tfw only "feels good" tier
>>81629715 (OP)Women's choices are dysgenic. If nothing is done, humans will evolve to be 9 feet tall and live to only 30 years old.
>>81629715 (OP)>female sexual selection is perfectNo. Like anything in evolution, it is just good enough. It is slow to adapt to changing circumstances liiiiiiikkkkeeee, for exaaaammmpple, BASEDCIETY!!!! Women' sexual preferences correspond to when we lived in grass huts on the African savannah according to the evolution jew, so unless you want to go back to that, you better take a better approach to female sexuality.
>>81629715 (OP)>They want a handsome man? Good looks signal good genetics.>Incels are wrong, women are right.Okay except cute aggression, acting uninterested, girlbossing, and gossiping, and instigating that women do to the guys they "like," makes them stressed out and more ugly. Explain that since you are so confident.