HOLY FUCK TURN ON THE NEWS
THIS IS WHAT I VOTED FOR

>>81636241 (OP)
sure lol
and greenlands next huh?
keep coping

>>81636241 (OP)
I voted for it though

>>81636241 (OP)
Its funny the us basically sustains canada just for the sake of doing it

>>81636241 (OP)
CANADA DELENDA EST

>>81636241 (OP)
I'm genuinely shocked that with all the shit he pulled when he got elected things are kinda working out for him
>All nato countries (except spain ofc) bump up defence spending
>got hostages out of gaza, including an american one for basically nothing in return
>destroyed iran's nuclear facilities
>about to sign trade deals with china
>operation wetback 2.0 in full force
the only thing he failed on is the russia shit

>>81636300
>>destroyed iran's nuclear facilities
Big doubt on that one, there are more reports coming from the US and Iran that it didn't get destroyed than there aren't. He did manage to stop Bibi's monthly sperg out thoughever

True dominance. Finally the reign of hoser tyranny is at an end. Glory to Manhattan, glory to Mar-a-lago.

>>81636332
even if they aren't completely destroyed theres no doubt they've taken serious damage, I was actually pretty surprised that they've been monitoring the ideal spots to bomb all the way back since 2008 in the pentagon, couple that with all the other sites and factories and chem facilities the israelis struck and its for all intents and purpose assured that Iran is no longer a nuclear threshold state, although with the insane regime there they aren't gonna stop trying to get nukes unless they're toppled but its going to take them years if not decades to get back to the same spot they were in before all this went down
to be clear I don't think toppling them using outside force is a good idea, that should be left to the people there, no one wants a repeat of iraq.

>>81636241 (OP)
>THIS IS WHAT I VOTED FOR
are we sure you're not a russian shill?

>>81636450
I'm just joking, buddy. It isn't even a real screenshot

>>81636403
Well... It's a bit hard to believe that they suffered serious damage when there was no radiation leak or evacuation. So I wouldn't even be surprised if Drumpf told them in advance (as Iran did when striking empty us bases in Qatar). But who knows. Maybe they weren't even close to getting nukes (Israel has been saying that they are since the 80s)
And yeah, toppling them isn't a good idea, not for the US, not for Iran, especially since they get more lax as the decades go by (comparing the Khomeini era to modern day Iran is like night and day, looking at videos online just makes it look like the Balkans)

>>81636483
so you are a russian shill

The government in this leaf shithole does a good enough job of destroying it by piping in pajeets and other thirdies at breakneck speed.

>>81636497
>Russian shill
Lolno the Ukraine war is a slaughterhouse ever since Putin invaded in 2022-23
Why would I vote for an Israeli first AIPAC shill?

>>81636493
>Well... It's a bit hard to believe that they suffered serious damage when there was no radiation leak or evacuation.
about that
>Striking a uranium enrichment facility does not release meaningful radiation. The uranium there has not been blasted with neutrons like in a nuclear reactor so its is not active. Most of what is at the site would be UF6 which is a gas. Even weapons grade uranium is not very radioactive. The biggest dangers are chemical reactions to the scientists on site. This is a lot different than striking an operating nuclear reactor or releasing a bomb.

>I wouldn't even be surprised if Drumpf told them in advance
he has a weird way of doing things but even he wouldn't mess around when it comes to nuclear weapons being on the line, again I'm not saying its impossible or anything, just that I think the stakes are too high to play around with, even for him
as for the iranian warning I think its moreso them being terrified of the US while they already were in an incredibly weakened state, plus the fact that they were technically striking a country they have good relations with (Qatar)
webm related from the pentagon press conference

>>81636570
Well yeah okay, maybe you're right. I didn't even know they had a video of it.
And yeah Iran is definitely terrified of the US and just tried backing out "gracefully" by showing their citizens that they're not simply pussying out after the strikes.

>>81636493
>Maybe they weren't even close to getting nukes
as for this part I think its mostly israeli operations that delayed them getting nukes (stuxnet, assassinations of nuclear scientists in Iran) plus no clear greenlight from khamenei to go ahead and build a nuke, but you don't build nuclear facilities inside literal mountains and avoiding surveillance from the IAEA if you're not doing something shady.

>>81636626
>I didn't even know they had a video of it.
it *is* an actual video showing how the MOP they dropped on it works, from an actual test they did of the bomb, but its not a video of the strike itself, just showing how it works.

>>81636653
No doubt about the fact that they're trying to get nukes one way or another for sure, but in this particular case, it just seemed like the perfect excuse for Bibi to stay in power. If he doesn't start another conflict soon he'll get booted out. So I'm not sure they were really that close to getting one.

>>81636662
Oh alright, thanks

Any /r9k/Canadians anons here how is in your opinion the current state of things in general going?2awhg