no pubes in classical paintings? - /r9k/ (#81662480) [Archived: 822 hours ago]

Anonymous
6/30/2025, 2:03:48 AM No.81662480
Gulr3G9aoAAqZ3v
Gulr3G9aoAAqZ3v
md5: 56154746e7ee39bec39067a2574f0197🔍
>Decided I would stop watching porn as it is an evil industry
>Fapping now only to classical paintings
>Notice that in the majority of them, women don't have pubes, even though in their time, bush were common (I think not a /his/torian)
>Why is that?
Also, please post your favorite ones.
Replies: >>81662510 >>81662525 >>81662534 >>81662552 >>81662553 >>81663558
Anonymous
6/30/2025, 2:04:36 AM No.81662487
a lot of times they paid prostitutes to be the models and they would get rid of pubic hair
Replies: >>81662551 >>81662608
Anonymous
6/30/2025, 2:06:46 AM No.81662510
>>81662480 (OP)
Have you ever seen a greek statue with bushes under its arms? Same reason, it's just artistically more pleasing.
Anonymous
6/30/2025, 2:08:23 AM No.81662525
>>81662480 (OP)
>Why is that?
Easier, simple curves are more aesthetically pleasing, youth has always been valued, some of these models were actual children.
Replies: >>81662551
Anonymous
6/30/2025, 2:09:10 AM No.81662529
Artists were men in privileged positions.
Men in privileged positions become pedos
Anonymous
6/30/2025, 2:09:40 AM No.81662534
>>81662480 (OP)
Drawing thin hair and making it look good is difficult
This is why nobody ever bothers drawing arm hir or peach fuzz
Anonymous
6/30/2025, 2:11:27 AM No.81662551
1713461638113417
1713461638113417
md5: 3aa20536f81331192d966f2b2f55e2c8🔍
>>81662487
>>81662525
Most of the time they'd actually use men (hence why a lot of them could look fairly muscular). Da Vinci didn't know what a vagina looked like
Replies: >>81662563 >>81662843
Anonymous
6/30/2025, 2:11:44 AM No.81662552
>>81662480 (OP)
Pubes are sexual so they left it out of their paintings to make the paintings less lewd.
Anonymous
6/30/2025, 2:11:51 AM No.81662553
>>81662480 (OP)
Look at "L'origine du monde" by Courbet
Replies: >>81662608
Anonymous
6/30/2025, 2:13:05 AM No.81662563
17138741365612
17138741365612
md5: d11bc49c9528cdfe0736d89f8a88934d🔍
>>81662551
>"Alright, I'm ready to settle down"
Anonymous
6/30/2025, 2:19:45 AM No.81662608
GuP9oCNaQAAvOHt
GuP9oCNaQAAvOHt
md5: e6145a3050124662a13fcad4620ae23a🔍
>>81662487
Would most prostitutes shave their pubic hair? Or only when working for a painter?
>>81662553
I've seen it, but again, it's not that common.
Replies: >>81662737
Anonymous
6/30/2025, 2:36:19 AM No.81662737
>>81662608
Probably to avoid pubic lice (crabs) which used to be common up until the last few decades as now grooming of body hair has made them nearly extinct
Anonymous
6/30/2025, 2:48:01 AM No.81662843
>>81662551
>Most of the time they'd actually use men
Is this true? Source?
Replies: >>81662913 >>81662929
Anonymous
6/30/2025, 2:58:05 AM No.81662913
>>81662843
It varies with time and place, but for example, Michelangelo's female nudes are just boys with bad titjobs, real tranny representation. (also he was a fag, so no love for womanly curves)
Anonymous
6/30/2025, 3:00:20 AM No.81662929
>>81662843
Nta and didn't read it but here's the first article that came up :
https://daily.jstor.org/delts-dont-lie/
>Renaissance artists routinely used men as models for their depictions of female subjects
Use Google mein nigga
Anonymous
6/30/2025, 3:46:38 AM No.81663255
Pubic hair is too sexual. Depicting desexualized women gets past the obscenity laws. Also some artists were pedos.
Anonymous
6/30/2025, 4:42:05 AM No.81663558
>>81662480 (OP)
its because pubes were made in the 1900s by jews so that you would buy razors