>Be early teen.
>Ask myself a simple question: How do gays reproduce? By molesting kids. Well, that didn't take long to figure out.
>Lefties: SOURCE?
>Source? What do you need a source for? It's common freakin' sense. Do you need a source to know when it's raining? But here's a study from the DOJ saying gays are 100 times more likely to molest kids.
>THAT'S OUT DATED!
>The age only proves how long we've known the obvious, and you think somehow, for some reason, they went from being 100x more likely, to being normal? How would that happen? You gotta source for that?
>IT'S OUTDATED!
Okay, let me throw in some modern pieces of evidence. For the next time this comes up
>Post it.
>That study is out dated!
I'm done. I'm freakin' done. Are these people just really inconceivably stupid, or are they actually, consciously, trying to defend pedos? They have to be just stupid right? I mean they can't be waving the pedo flag around in public, in their stores, on purpose right? This is crazy? How can you be this disgusting?

Oh because they have domestication syndrome, but that's another picture everyone ignores or argues with when I post it. It's all so tiresome.

>>81666835 (OP)
>Are these people just really inconceivably stupid
You have two options.
A. Yes
B. You have discovered evil.
Either way, you will learn that further discussion is fruitless.
You must either remove their ability to inflict harm via removing their power / voice, or kill them.

Other pic of the syndrome.

>>81666835 (OP)
>How do gays reproduce? By molesting kids. Well, that didn't take long to figure out.
Thats not true though. Your intuition is wrong

My updated domestication syndrome pic.

>>81666989
Source? Thank you kindly.

I have a million versions of this pic because I can't stop making minor edits.

>>81666835 (OP)
You're also just a fucking retard. 30 is the minimum sample size for many statistical formulas, and even if this *was* completely accurate in 1985, there are a lot more butthole (male) enjoyers, the result statistic would be completely different. Assuming >>81667025 is also you, congratulations you've posted a picture that is almost half true.

>>81667039
i didnt know plato lived 100000 years ago

>>81667039
>I have a million versions of this pic because I can't stop making minor edits.
Create a 1 gigabyte image with a collage of all your edits.

>>81667574
>plato is woke
The syndrome is strong with this one