>>81673192"Freedom" is a funny way to say that nobody gives a shit if men harm themselves. I think a more apt term is "disposable." Women are pressured to succeed, and men are, well, unimportant. Men are free, maybe, in the sense that a pawn is free while a queen can't just fly into the enemy territory without consequences.
That's how they're explaining the education gap, at least. Now that men are doing worse, it's because men are free and still superior socially, not because soceity doesn't give a flying fuck about men and mostly cares about protecting women at all costs under our feminism-hyjacked patriarchy that uses slave morality to justify its masochistic obsession with making men(so-called masters) out of women(so-called slaves).
Well, I have news for you. Women are currently superior to men. Women are the masters currently. And wordsmithing language such that it makes men's dismal conditions sound like palices and gold will not work forever. Men will have their equity. Men will, inevidably, don slave morality, and the left will implode. I'd give it about 40 years.
Women taking on master ethics is contingent on the men's rights movement becoming progressive. Women will finally prey upon men in broad daylight in a feminine manner once feminimity is not unanimous with softness and weakness and maculinity is not with dominance and power, and patriarchy will be far less unanimous in likely about 80 years.
