According to Mens attractiveness scale for women, I am too ugly to even be on it. After seeing them rate what I thought were 7 or 8s as a 2 or 3, I knew it was over for me.

>>81680687 (OP)
You're fine moids just do that to make women feel bad about themselves. It's one of those tactics in the 48 rules of power. Don't feel sad and just laugh at their unoriginallity and cuckism.

>>81680687 (OP)
Post these 7s and 8s

>>81680712
So it was all just an ego thing? I thought I was crazy, I was seeing perfectly fine looking women and men calling them ugly objectively. Not even fat, just normal looking people

>>81680687 (OP)
u wanna date me?

>>81680757
I would date you but you are Stacy only as always. I wont look like that drawing or your fantasies. You would reject me.

>>81680687 (OP)
if u want u can send me a pic and ill rate you

>>81680687 (OP)
>>81680724
Ghosting me bc you know they were actually 3s

>>81680831
No I just didnt save the pictures from the posts they made.

>>81680742
Absolutely an ego thing! And I promise you're not crazy. The world can be though. Just always keep in mind that these ratings are coming from men who've never even spoken to a woman who isn't blood related and theyre also pedos soooo. Who cares what they think? Most ppl don't so that's why they go to the internet to recite their retarded Tantra.

>>81680853
Then post their lookalikes, or other examples of what you consider a 7/8

>>81680687 (OP)
Only top tier men do that go for somebody who looks equal to you

>>81680862
It's a bait thread so they won't, OP will make another bs excuse as to why they can't.

>>81680857
>And also theyre pedos
>Sooo
You have outed yourself as a moid. Did you really think I would fall for that?

>>81680862
>>81680875
I was actually looking for lookalikes, why do you have to assume this? Stop being impatient and wait for me to find it.

>>81680798
no i wouldnt, but you would reject me cuz im ugly and bald

>>81680687 (OP)
You know that men have different things they find attractive in women right?
They are not as monolithic as you might think.

>>81680897
Your next reply has to be a lookalike or nobody will reply to this thread further