Something that I find really crazy is that 100% (or nearly) of feminist activists have met women. Like, they've met and interacted with everyday women, and then said to themselves
>yeah, I actively want THAT THING to have greater degrees of influence in society moving forward. That is what I want for the future, and it seems reasonable to me. More leadership roles, more rights, more power to THAT.
THATS FUCKING CRAZY
Cannot comprehend or relate. What is their endgame?

why is cewl so insufferable

>>81681481
Because she's selfish and narcissistic

no, the eagles don't need to do that

>>81681481
she seemed nice when I talked to her

Have you met men, but any chance? It's the same argument. People aren't smart. It doesn't make a difference whether you are a man or women to me.

>>81681515
You're right, which is why I ultimately advocate for most people having their rights stripped, and only a meritocratic elite being given a voice in social planning, but universal rights for women is clearly a bigger problem than universal rights for men.

Wow I'd give a lot to get to try touching some beautiful young breasts like those

>>81681531
that's just because you're a narcissistic faggot who hates everyone. and you can advocate whatever you want but you should be aware your ideas will never be popular or have any way to realistically be implemented

>>81681629
I wouldn't be so sure of that, the world is pushing towards a more exclusive political view very fast these days, and it's only going to get more common with advancements in technology and climate crises.

>>81681574
She'd probably let you, she's kinda a slut, but she's significantly fatter and older now.

>>81681665
did her boobs get bigger

>>81681474 (OP)
They want social points and reasources. Much of it is not because they like women, but because they hate men and want men's stuff. It's internalized penis envy. One of the most powerful emotions a foid can have.

Notice how their entire movement works by framing women as inferior materially or socially or by some other metric? It's just more of the patriarchy, more saying men are superior to women, but instead of using patriarchy to justify giving resources to advantaged people, it's used to justify giving resources to disadvantaged people.

It's just slave morality but for women. Feminists don't actually see women as better than men. They just want women(slaves) to become men(masters). They see women as worse than men and thus more deserving of power because they are more needing of it.

It has created this situation where women are masters by many many metrics but still view man as superior, still living in man's shadow as woman uses his own darkness to choke him out while she curses at his light.

Their endgame is to become men, just as any slave's endgame is to become a master, or any poor man's is to be rich. They still actually just hate themselves.

>>81681531
men are not any more deserving than women

>>81681511
>she seemed nice when I talked to her
I have a bridge to sell you

>>81681531
>(((meritocratic elite)))

>>81681671
Yeah, but they hang more

>>81681674
>They still actually just hate themselves.
As they should, I just wish they could let go of their self-loathing enough to think of the disastrous consequences they're having on the future of the human race.

>>81681736
Do you have a pic? I think my favorite feature of her breasts is her smooth nipples. I definitely think I'd enjoy touching them if I had the chance but I doubt she is local to me plus I don't know how to ask.

you only hate women because you're not one yourself, same with women who hate men.
don't fool yourselves
you're not an activist out of love of "your" race, gender, sexuality, social class and so on.
90% of black activists are black, 90% of white nationalists are white, 90% of lgbtq activists are lgbt and so one.
you didn't pick "your" side because it's the true one but because it's the one that's most convenient to you..
in the end you're simply defending the interests of the body you happened to be born in. it's understandable but also extremely unenlightened and samsara coded

>>81681763
They hate themselves, and you don't expect them to try and fix it? Their entire movement is founded on misanthropy, anon. You really think they care about the future of the human race if it just seems like it will always be shit for them?

Men talked about women like shit. Now, women see themselves as shit. So, resentful they will be. Feminists can not see a world where anyone benefits from men. They see the worst of men and will emulate that to avoid the repressed even worse of women, which they blame on men. There is zero chill. They are victims. That's their whole mindset. Nothing is good.

>>81681703
Who is the pajeet that keeps posting this.
Fake image. Youre not italian, saar.

simps that are really desperate my dude.
pussy worshippers who need to be beat back into their natural state

>>81682076
>>81681674
100% agree with this, they have turned extremely rabid recently too. I did laugh when I noticed their only "culture" was just copy pasting incel words but changing them to be anti male. From "foid" to "moid", truly the best females could do lol.

>>81682933
Nah, it's more like "mansplaining" or "manspreading" or "male gaze" or "toxic masculinity" or "misogyny" or "manterrupting" or yeah, actually, "moid". "Foid" came first from the OG incels before incels were a thing and was copied.

Man = bad news. Woman = helpless victim in need of empowering.

It's literally just the patriarchy but weaponized for women.