>marrying your cousin

Disgusting and backwards

>gay sex

Progressive and open minded


Why is this the case?

>>81685060 (OP)
bnecause it just is okay

>>81685060 (OP)
doing gaysex wouldnt produce mentally retarded people

>>81685122
Why would marrying your cousin make your kids retarded

>>81685122
Are they mentally fit to begin with right? kek

>>81685122
ALL heterosexual sex has a chance of producing retards. So youre saying gay sex is less backwards than ALL heterosexual sex.

>>81685122
Drop dead pedo faggot

>>81685135
>>81685149
dude. fucking your cousin has a HIGH chance of your kids being retard/deformed/ugly just complete genetic trash
that's a worse fate than being born to begin with
>>81685156
i dont care about fags just dont breed your cousin

>>81685060 (OP)
both are bad albeit, they're just two different types of degeneracy

>>81685135
Paki hands wrote this

>>81685060 (OP)
Actually there's nothing wrong with the FIRST GENERATION of kids technically. It's legally wrong sure but I still wouldn't do it

>>81685060 (OP)
>shoving plastic objects up your ass until they get lodged in your small intestine
Beautiful and progressive
>having vaginal sex for procreation
Hateful and bigoted, think of climate change you selfish asshole

>>81685060 (OP)
>Disgusting and backwards
wrong, its perfectly acceptable in Canada

>>81685060 (OP)
Incest leads to genetic fuckups. Gay sex doesn't even make babies, much less genetic fuckups.

>>81685060 (OP)
Gays are clearly people with a permanently gay type character build who were created by screwed up hormone levels in the womb.
Incest on the other hand isn't something anyone is built for. Anyone who fucks his sister or cousin could have just as easily just fucked a less closely related woman.
Trannies have less evidence supporting the idea they're the product of a special developmental problem with feminized brains, but gays have a lot of evidence for that in contrast. You can create gay male bottom mice in a lab pretty reliably with early on castration and hormone tinkering.

>>81685286
There's no fixing this and the only way out is topping myself? How brutal

>>81685199
It's a Jeet and Pakistani thing

>>81685165
>High
I actually never thought about the actual risks so I went to look it up and
>The risk of birth defects is generally elevated from 2-3% in unrelated couples to 4-6% for first cousins
I still wouldnt advocate for it but it's not a "high chance" as you put it.

>>81685165
Its barely higher than non related couples

>>81685182
this. do not ever EVER forget it.