>just talk to us you stupid incels!
>ok hi, my name is-
>ew you're not 6'2, don't have a 8/10 face and don't have a car? Go away you fucking loser

>>81693250 (OP)
Of course the moid only want Stacie's kek
It's all projection on your part

I will start talking to women again once being a simp or a feminist is no longer the norm.

daily reminder that lonely women can always talk to us.

posted the same ragebait for over a year award

>>81693259
I do want at least Becky.

>>81693250 (OP)
What makes them lie so brazenly? They get nothing out of it, it achieves nothing, but it's like they can't help themselves from constantly lying about this.
>>81693259
>HTTBSIDVSH NO U NO U N-NO U!!!!!!!!!
Thank you for your input.

>>81693289
It's not lying if they believe it. They're just retarded.

>>81693289
By men the originally mean chads

The daily gay psyopper demoralization attempt.

>>81693259
>Of course the moid only want Stacie's kek
There were lots of women all around me I had the biggest crushes on while I was growing up. Stacy only is demoralization bait for women

>>81693378
so stacies then

>>81693391
No they were just young and cute and nice. If you're a zoomer maybe things changed. People were less demanding about looks back then

>>81693250 (OP)
generic ass post anon, we know you can do better
>just talk to us you stupid incels!
I assure you no one is saying this. Most sympathetic women would likely recommend therapy and making friends
>>81693473
I'm a zoomer (b. 2002) and it hasn't changed, at least not here in the UK. At school, uni, public, etc, I've seen women I wasn't attracted to who had partners, I also saw men I didn't deem conventionally attractive who had partners.
Guys here seem to think they're in the majority, likely because they only post here and nowhere else. The reality is most people are able to get partners if they want to, including people they would deem "sub 8". The people here have trouble with relationships mostly cause they're mentally ill, friendless, unemployed, were abused, etc.
And I'm not talking down to you in that regard, the first three all apply to me. But its important to recognise the real problems if anything is gonna change. I would probably recommend counselling to everyone on this board, ik that's not realistic cause most of you are in the US and it's a shithole without proper healthcare, but if you have the opportunity to seek therapy I definitely would. I have, and its stopped me from killing myself, at least. hopefully it'll do more as time goes on, and it'll do good for you if you seek it out.

>>81693259
We would prefer a real life mid girl but when the only option is ai then why not try to make it as attractive as possible when you can?

>>81693578
Sub 8s become betabuxxers.
Therapy doesn't work.

>>81693617
>Sub 8s become betabuxxers.
but the "sub 8" partners were the same age ranges? or are you suggesting that all those women were secretly cheating with more conventionally attractive men behind their partner's back?
>Therapy doesn't work.
are you talking from experience? if you are, I'm sorry it didn't work out for you. I don't personally have much hope in the current therapy I'm going for, but if it doesn't work then I'll try a different form of therapy. not all forms work for all people. If you still need it I'd suggest you look into maybe trying something else

>>81693696
>or are you suggesting that all those women were secretly cheating with more conventionally attractive men behind their
Yup

>>81693696
I already did 2 different forms of therapy, CBT and ACT it doesn't do anything for me.
Yes, the girl will often cheat if she can get a better guy. If you are ok with that risk, then I genuinely wish you all the best, maybe you will be lucky.

>>81693696
betabuxxers refers to the fact that women date the chads in their 20s, or try to, as they only keep them around for a little while and dump them, or abuse and cheat on them. Then, as they get a little older, they look for boring stable guys who don't truly excite them, but they stick around and provide them the lifestyle they are looking for, while they give up the romantic relationship they desire. Betabuxxers are not attractive to their girlfriends, and their girlfriends are often resentful of the guy for not making her feel the way chad did. The stereotype for the betabuxxer is that he's raising another man's child.

The betabux narrative is a real problem, if you like the idea of growing together with your partner and sex being special and exclusive it's a dagger through the heart of both. Not to mention guys are most attracted to women when they're young. You can try and gaslight men into framing this disappointment as insecurity but what if it doesn't work?

why are women complaining about ugly men getting ai girlfriends?

AI will soon replace women on OF, with a model trained on their own pictures.

Men are shit, preferring this global warming slop chatbots to talking to actual women.

The worst part is they know full well it won't work, but they are retarded so it will only cause more tantrums instead of them finally taking the correct decision

>>81693851
i've never talked to a chatbot and don't ever plan to.

But I'm also not going out of my way to talk to women. I've been there. Women can come up and talk to me.

>>81693851
>Men are shit for not being a supplicant slave race that does nothing but try to appeal to women who hate them and will never reciprocate no matter what you do!
Or, and this is just an idea; Women are so utterly fucking vile men can't even be forced to deal with them? You sound scared, bitch, maybe desperately insist it "won't work" because it makes you seethe more to make you feel better.