i know im not the only one, but as of 2025 it seems impossible to find any content on the entire internet that is of a quality high enough to feel like it was worth viewing. whether its threads on 4chan, movies, tv shows, tiktok, youtube, or any other algorithmic slop, everything sucks its all low quality and feels like it has no value. i know its out there somewhere.

my condolences for your loss

>>81707490 (OP)
The algos have gotten worse lately and as a result people stopped making good content and instead make more algoslop

It's over. Read a book, look at some birds, pet a stray cat

You know they got women running for office these days? Like I be in the ballot box and some of these bitches sound fine as hell. They got the sexy porn star names like Lori Lightfoot or some shit. Like damn can I vote for your ass to meet me at Radisson by airport instead of a damn governor's mansion? You ever have some ugly, bald motherfucker grab your girl's ass? That's me! So I'm watching this porno the other day, and you know what I realized? The pandemic changed porno. They guys know what I mean. Yeah, Don't act like you don't know like girls be wearing masks and shit like Sub-Zero from Mortal Kombat is sucking and fucking in these pornos nowadays. I watched so much damn porno during the pandemic. We all did. Right fellas? The guys know what I'm talking about. My posse was like "your hand gonna be the only thing hairy on your body"
cause you know how jacking off make you palm hairy? Like it was on some royal family shit. King Harry hairy Royal, whatever his name is, yeah, uh. Okay, uh, what else? Uhh so the royal family is in the news again. Yeah, the Queen died. What did someone fuck her too much? Cause she was just too old for giving that pussy away. You ever be fucking some old puss and think like " Yo I'm going to kill this bitch"
like no way a doctor said her heart healthy enough for sex Anyway that how the Queen died from giving away the pussy too damn old.

>>81707490 (OP)
>know its out there somewhere.
That's the neat part - it's not.
The current state of the internet was inevitable.
Everything is made easily digestible, designed for broadest scope, maximum viewership. Everything is safe, and long, and full of ads.
Just as our almighty corporate gods intended.

>>81707490 (OP)
it's called getting older

>>81707541
I'm 38 and can't relate to what OP is describing. How old do you think OP is?

>>81707490 (OP)
This is worth viewing.

>it seems impossible to find any content on the entire internet that is of a quality high enough to feel like it was worth viewing.
And yet you continue to consume said content. Not blaming you or anything, big companies are getting creative on ways to keep us hooked on screens and keep consuming their shit.

>>81707490 (OP)
Have you tried Tor's Cabinet of Curiosities?

There's more peak slop produced from before I was born than I could ever consume. 2000's and onward needs to be consumed and digested. 100 years from now they'll be bitching about how shit the slop is, and nothing like the [needles in a haystack] from the 21st century. Naturally they forget or overlook the 99% of shit we see today. The cream will float to the top on its own. No need to go skimming it yourself when previous generation already skimmed their shit for gold.
I do think we are in a uniquely shit time, from a content creation standpoint. Anyone with a keyboard can slap together a book, comic, article... Movies have long been creatively bankrupt, but now more than ever before movies, series, vidya, everything is subjected to endless committees and focus groups to make the blandest possible thing with the broadest tolerableness. Gone are the days you'd have a man with an idea pitch to a man with money and a vision of passion is brought to life and distributed. Just dead, sterile works. By the time they finish remaking, sequeling, and prequeling everything it will be time for another redo. Who knows when people will get around to making something for the sake of making something good instead of checking a bunch of boxes and sticking to editors and focus groups' whims.