>DEFINE WOKE

DEFINE IM GOING TO RAPE YOU FAGGOT

no, it's often a good question. people have different meanings on what it means for something or someone to be "woke", so why not get an understanding in the conversation of what is being talked about.

>>81714243 (OP)
It's when you're like annoying about being PC or something.

>>81714243 (OP)
DEI policy ruining society.

>>81714243 (OP)
Anti White Sentiment

>>81714285
Cultural Marxism

>>81714285
Name 3 examples of public figures arguing in good faith (as opposed to lefties shifting the burden of explanation onto the opponent) and define "woke" as something that can't be counted under the umbrella of "supportive of leftist identity politics, such as BLM and LGBT".

Whatever
Offends
Klansmen
Easily

There you go OP

>>81714757
>Name 3 examples of public figures arguing in good faith-
Irrelevant.
>something that can't be counted under the umbrella of "supportive of leftist identity politics, such as BLM and LGBT".
Define "leftist identity politics".

>>81714243 (OP)
"Woke" began as slang for adherents to the "social justice" cause, who were awakened to the problems of society. However it soon began to be used as a justification for absurdities like safe spaces and the idea men can be women, if you disagree they will claim you are a "fascist" or a KKK member and this is how it is generally understood by most now, using this as a way to silence real debate, particularly on the internet but also in colleges and places where it is prevalent. Since "woke" is no longer perceived as fashionable contemporary African American vernacular slang among the left it usually means the latter.

We now live in a society where everyone treads on eggshells over "racism", "sexism", "homophobia" and "transphobia". If a business is 60% men, this can be used as evidence in frivolous discrimination lawsuits to claim they are "sexist", even if they are 60% women they might still claim there are not enough women board members or the boss was "manspreading" or "mansplaining", for example. There are equivalents for "racial microaggressions", "transphobia" and the like.

This was supposed to be the social revolution of the 2010s, but it simply resulted in Trump being elected who was seen as the only public figure willing to defy the "woke" left despite his chicanery and shenanigans. DEI has been rolled back and transsexuals are no longer viewed as their gender of choice by presidential decree, however a deep polarization remains and likely will manifest in other ways as America declines.

case in point >>81714802
>if you don't believe men can be women you're a literal heckin' Klansman

>>81714843
>Irrelevant.
Very relevant. Some random schizos from nowhere thinking "woke = opposition to vanilla ice cream" is not representative of anything near a reasonably held opinion. Name 3 public figures now.
>Define "leftist identity politics".
Try reading the rest of the sentence, particularly the part where specific movements are mentioned.

>>81714915
you know life is way easier when you try to understand people around you and don't bother people needlessly
regardless, everyone knows cis and trans women are different and acting like men are just becoming women is kind of ignorant, but that's the mode by which you people operate anyways.

>>81714920
I can't think of 3 public figures that actually believe in woke because it's not a movement, it's a collection of progressive attitudes that make people feel dirty about themselves

>>81714243 (OP)
woke is a vibe. you know when you see it. it's bean mouth animation, half of the cast of a cartoon being lesbian black women in charge, asian vikings, cows being nonbinary, etc.

the problem is there is no real concrete definition so racist, misogynistic or homophobic people will call anything where black people or women exist in prominent roles woke.

Bonus points if it's a media project that does poorly financially. If it does it's woke. If it does well, like black panther, its magically not woke.