To Women,

I resent you. I don't want to torture you, I just don't want to be around you. I don't want to contribute to your prosperity even a little bit. I think I feel very cynical of you, and the way you are just not pressed at all to learn that you have made mistakes at all, let alone what they currently are. Until you learn the problem is actually women and want to make a positive fix to your own bad behavior not my reaction to your bad behavior there is no possibility for a productive dialogue or a positive change between the genders. I must impress that it really is all your fault.

Anon

>Last Thread:
>>81712144

Alright! Another thread!

>>81719370 (OP)
Tell me what I can do to be better? Do you think the old ways when women didn't have their own bank accounts and had little to no freedom where better for everyone?

>>81719388
Not op but unironically yes. Women need to be leashed and restrained otherwise you get the crap you see today

>>81719407
But would you really wish to be with a woman that only chose to be with you out of necessity and not because she has the freedom and still decides to choose you? If not, why not just go to the Philippines or another poor country and get a woman that chooses you only out of necessity like women used to do?

>>81719388
>women have their own bank accounts
>they exclusively buy cheep chinese shit
>they take out loans to buy cheep chinese shit
>had little to no freedom
freedom to do what? plenty of women have lost hands their hands in 19th century fabrics.
All academic reforms now need to have some addendum about how "WE NEED MORE WOMEN IN STEM, AND THAT'S OUR MAIN GOAL" as if most college professors and attendees aren't starting to be women too.
you have your freedom and you only vote for more welfare now.
>voting rights
fuck that, the fuckers that died in wars should've asked for more land not their chance to cast a piece of paper in the goy opinion box (no, im not talking about america exclusively here)

>>81719438
>she has the freedom and still decides to choose you
>she decides that she is chad only
that's mighty kind of you all

>>81719388
> Do you think the old ways when women didn't have their own bank accounts and had little to no freedom where better for everyone?
No. I do however think you are seriously mischaracterizing it by focusing on the plights of women in 1920 as if they were substantially greater than everyone else's when it was a time of extreme strife and difficult living conditions for everyone. I also think your "no freedom" is hyperbolic and that you picked this up from feminists with an agenda when if you asked elderly women they didn't so much agree with your very postmodern highly propagandized interpretation of that history where feminism is not just taught but POLICED on all speech and media and teaching right now. You should critically think for a moment and ask if your very self preferential interpretation of black and white history with the explicit intention to be used as pretext for justifying political action and economic favoritism today might be a little bit biased, and that there's something a bit wrong with the way you approach me when you keep trying to make the conversation about how unfortunate you are when you are in the wrong here. I think your reflex here pisses me off for a multitude of very justified reasons and I don't blame guys on here for just making fun of you instead because you come off like a self centered histrionic demonizing retard who doesn't understand where they are, who they are talking to, what point in history we're in and what kind of conversation we're having. Do yourself a favor and stop trying to slip in feminist talking points for a minute and just acknowledge you're wrong, and if you can't do that, don't expect respectful treatment for your objectionable, stupid and lowly behavior.
> Tell me what I can do to be better?
You can start acknowledging that you have a bias. Acknowledging that this bias is not justified and you ought not be discriminating because of it. If you can't manage that then you are a hypocrite.

>>81719452
>they exclusively buy cheap Chinese shit
This is such a strange generalization that is not accurate. I know men that also buy cheap Chinese shit from Temu, so I am not sure that is exclusively a female thing and even if it were it is not something that all women do with their money.

What's wrong with women being encouraged to be in STEM? it's better and more useful for society than OF and much preferred than any risk of there being a lack of people going into such fields, especially since Gen Z are quite often refusing to study or work now.

Voting for welfare? who is? The average person now needs a two person income to survive in most cities so if they do not have that it makes sense that people would vote for more welfare.

People fought wars but it was never actually 'for the women' I hope you realize that was never the truth

>>81719438
>a woman that only chose to be with you out of necessity and not because she has the freedom and still decides to choose you?
the dark part is realizing not just that it WAS this way but still is. That's the meme of Lois Lane dreaming in bed with Superman and thinking "Is this really the best I can get?" The truth is women, all women are choosing not out of love but something a lot more low brow. Women still date for money, or for height and muscles and all the shallow things, it's just now they're on average even worse people, more mentally ill, more obnoxious and mined for their labor and want to put the extra stress on all the men in their lives. Not just their husbands but their brothers and "friends" and their male students and their male patients and their male colleagues and any male that they meet. They don't knit cook or clean they have twice as much to bitch about , they're gross trashy disloyal whores and don't appreciate men. The most entitled generation of prejudiced piggy fat projecting mentally ill rotten generation girls ever made. I will not allow you to characterize it as if women today love more than they did yesteryear. That is narcissistic self satisfying bullshit, and you're not self aware enough to know it.

>>81719469
I came into this with a genuine intention to gauge your thoughts and opinions on the matter which is why I asked such question. The issue here is you instantly came on the defence instead of taking in what I said and giving a thoughtful response, you are met with deflection and defensiveness. Your topic here is clearly about women, thus I was asking about your opinions on how you feel women should live as you do not seem to be a fan of how women are living or acting now. I can see I won't be able to get any productive answer from you as a defensive and bitter man so I will continue to go on with my day as I don't want to waste my time.

>>81719523
Do us all a favor and kill yourself.

>>81719532
I'm quite happy with my life so I will not kill myself.

>>81719537
You're not satisfied with shit, and you've got half a mind to end it right now.

>>81719488
>if I just ignore observable reality I will have an argument against what you said chud
Women account for most consumer spending, which is why they are the second choice our malevolent rulers decided to bump up their numbers in higher paid positions. An impulsive buyer doesn't stimulate the economy as well as someone that has healthy saving habits.
>it's better and more useful for society than OF
>implying in a back handed way that OF it's the first choice for women
you suck at propaganda and bating, if the reddit spacing wasn't evidence enough.
>women being encouraged to be in STEM?
men didn't need special grants, safe spaces, reserved seats, etc. to become engineers. And this is leaving aside the fact that women just don't like STEM.
>especially since Gen Z are quite often refusing to study or work now
this is a cynical way of framing the current phenomenon of academic inflation. Most zoomers don't want to finish their academic journey at 30+ so they are open to other avenues of earning a living.
>Voting for welfare? who is?
women? I already said it.
>makes sense that people would vote for more welfare
>cities
no, it would make sense to vote for anti-zoning and anti-immigration laws. Things that should be bipartisan issues but aren't because women can't into long term planning.
>People fought wars but it was never actually 'for the women' I hope you realize that was never the truth
this was a tangential comment and I never implied they fought for women

>>81719532
>tells her to kill herself while acting like the victim
he truly does cry out as he strikes you

>>81719370 (OP)
I love you anonn!

>>81719646
>he trul--
Do it.

>>81719648
Bitch, I'll fight you for him!

>>81719655
>do it
um no?

I hate women too and I like to post cute animals while describing my disgust towards them. they have wronged me throughout my life and i hold no regard to their wellbeing