Is the human race redeemable? How can I not become a misanthrope when the only difference between civilization and total savagery is an empty stomach?
>>81734453 (OP)"It's impossible to stay angry for long with all this beauty in the world"
By that standard, no. Humanity isn't savable. This is why society and the social contract exists, to prevent us from going ape mode. Unfortunately more and more people are waking to the obvious violations of the social contract.
>>81734487all of this will be destroyed and made into concrete apartment complexes for niggers jeets and Muslims. It's over.
>>81734487Upon closer inspection you will find an ant colony devouring a baby bird that fell out of its nest in that tree.
>>81734519the gnostics were right
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dNnQzLXPy18
>>81734487Nature is horrific and anyone who has spent any time at all in the wilderness will tell you that. The only true beauty in the world is built with human hands, and we are only capable of doing that because we operate a holocaust of animal slaughter and systematic environmental rape that provides for us just barely enough food to not want to eat, rape and enslave each other.
>>81734498The only real social contract is the inviolable natural law of hunger.
>>81734453 (OP)Jesus already redeemed humanity though.
Everytime we here about how humans are so cruel it's usually male violence
Inb4 christcucks say females are bad for killing fetuses
>>81734878Not unconditionally. He says you need to give all your money and property to the poor, and nobody does that, so we are all condemned.
>>81734520Isn't it beautiful? Death nurturing life. Nothing ever ends, anon
>>81735277It is revolting. How is death and suffering being an integral part of survival anything other than horrific?
>>81734911The black female murder rate through abortion is higher than the black male murder rate through firearms
>>81734519>>81734543This is pretty. It's brutal and ruthless, but pretty.
Food security is the key to avoiding an empty stomach. By far food is the easiest and most abundant part of being human/society. One man can provide for many. More hands allows for more specialists, which is good up to a certain point. Textiles and metalworking are excellent examples. Charcoal, ceramics, fishermen... The key is thinking small. Reading about the Roman empire and enlightenment Europe makes you wonder what the biggest level of small is possible. But the main point to remember is people in the past barely did any work. That is why art used to exist. People had so much free time they decided to build a cathedral, painting, sculpture, write, whatever. The stuff they bought was not designed to break, which is efficient for engineers, manufacturer, and users alike from work to design, work to make, and work to obtain funds to purchase thing. Not very profitable, but efficient in time and resources.
I think fake jobs and fake money are the primary blights upon society. Bankers are paid to push pretend numbers around, kick the can down the road, and fashion the emporers new clothes in the form of "financial instruments". Money is created out of nothing loaned to money users with interest. Unsustainable. Going from no money in society to $100 at 1% interest. There is only $100 in existence, but the amount owed is $1. Either debts exceed money supply, or all the money finds its way back in the issuers possession. Work is not done but the issuers are compensated? This is fundamentally flawed and morally repugnant. Money as real value and tied to real assets and measurable in terms of real labor is how it should be. Inequality is the natural state of man, and that is OK. Inheritance is a good thing, so long as the wealth was not amassed through ill means. Kin should take care of kin, you want your children to live better than you did.
But, the same amount of work is currently compensated differently.
>>81734453 (OP)The difference is your ability to reason, not your stomach you fatso retard
>>81737473Reason goes out the window when you are starving.
>>81737808Animals are made of meat. Fruit and vegetables grow on plants. One would have to be pretty darn stupid to starve.
>>81738487If we all returned to hunting and foraging there would maybe be enough food to support 5% of the current human population. If agricultural output drops, millions die. That is how it works.
>>81734911>Inb4 christcucks say>>>>>>sayan argument doesn't become any less valid just because you acknowledged it
>>81734576nature's brutality isn't an excuse for ours. animals kill to survive, we kill billions for sensory pleasure (taste of flesh). that is not nature but moral failing.
>>81734487I'm not OP and I gotta tell you, I love this world of mine but still hate the human race nonetheless, is not a thing about being angry at, it's one of feeling resigned
>>81734453 (OP)no its not redeemable
you will always have to look out for yourself and your loved ones no matter what
part of being around humans is accepting they are just as capable of barbarism as they are of being "civil"
>>81738664Hmm yeah OK so maybe it's a good idea to get plants and animals to do agriculture with? That's what I would do instead of starve. Not my problem if output drops or only 5% survive. I'll be rofling and lmaoing at them over a nice big plate of food. Like imagine someone so stupid they starve. Pathetic.
>>81734453 (OP)At our core we are just intelligent apes that walk on two feet
>>81739312I prefer to think of us as featherless bipeds
>>81734487Minus the predators and shit sure
>>81735556I thought you were lying but I just looked it up
~28 abortions out of 1000 pregnancies vs ~50 murders per 100000 people
>>81739867This is why need mass abortions in every major nigger area. We need to pay them to have abortions.