They are simply more psychotic on average.
More competitive AKA more selfish thus more willing to be cold to get their goals accomplished. War is highly unreasonable yet men are responsible for 100% of wars, genocides and other major conflicts resulting in the unnecessary deaths of millions of innocents.

>If a woman were president she wouldn't have what it takes durrr

To deal with other male leaders because they are evil, yes. If all leaders were female and everyone in positions of power were female that wouldn't be the case

wow, what an original and thought-provoking thread

>>81737995 (OP)
some men are obsessively logically and think everything needs to be thus and so, but most guys are the opposite of logical and think in a why not kind of way. what exactly is your intention with this thread?

They would stop at having shit gossip behind each other, would be quality reality tv instead of the murder from shit warmonger males

>>81737995 (OP)
>War is highly unreasonable yet men are responsible for 100% of wars, genocides and other major conflicts resulting in the unnecessary deaths of millions of innocents.
Ohononononononoonononononoononononon. Women simply are not strong enough to do that so they abuse men for that who just want to live a peaceful life with their families. Most wars are actually caused by women.

>>81737995 (OP)
Uhh didn't female rulers inflict more wars throughout history than male ones?

>>81737995 (OP)
>If all leaders were female and everyone in positions of power were female that wouldn't be the case

>>81738050
>>81738042

>female rulers inflict more wars throughout history than male ones

"AI Overview
No, it is not accurate to say that female rulers inflict more wars throughout history than male rulers. Historical data suggests that female rulers have been involved in wars at a similar rate to male rulers, and in some cases, even less frequently, according to some historical analyses. Some studies have even indicated that queens were more likely to wage war due to perceived weaknesses in their leadership or to maintain their power, but this is not a universal or definitive finding. "

>>81737995 (OP)
I saw a guy with this image on the back of his shirt today.

>>81737995 (OP)
I'm an intp logician and you wouldn't like me so....

>>81737995 (OP)
>>81738007
>>81738008
>>81738036
>>81738042
>>81738050
>>81738055
>>81738058
>>81738531
>>81738557
The energy of creation requires the energy of destruction.

Abstinence from violence does not imply virtue. Otherwise, whores would still value chastity.

Also, the whores are only attracted to the rulers and destroyers because these whores are lesser evolved and horribly coddled. (Consult with pic related)

>>81737995 (OP)
>If all leaders were female and everyone in positions of power were female...

than the world would be stagnant and humanity would eternally writhe in slop-communes with these lesser evolved animals known as "women"

And women love it

Emotional intelligence is not intelligence its liberal bullshit promoting bipolar bullshit and environmentalist bleeding heart faggotry

>the foid virgin needs to reply
>the ghost chad is free to collect replies and do nothing