>You have questioned your own intellectual abilities. In other words, if you've ever found yourself wondering if you have a low IQ, chances are you do.
>Problems understanding mathematical logic. It is not worth making the excuse that "if I study, I can do well." The average person is not going to struggle with math, whether or not they study 'enough'. If you have to study a minimum, it's over.
>Aversion and panic towards riddles, puzzles and anything that challenges the mind. No, it's not that 'fear has stopped you from learning well', it's that you never could and never would have been able to. Do mental challenges scare you? Welcome to the club.
>Your habits do not coincide with an intellectual lifestyle, rather with one that is not so challenging or you simply prefer the artistic. You may like cinema, reading, psychology, philosophy, dealing with other people. But you have distanced yourself from engineering, science, and other cultured activities. It's not a coincidence, it's just that you are not made for them.
>Do you find it difficult to understand abstract concepts? Do you need paper and pen to solve literally any problem? No, it's not that "your learning method is visual", it's that you have a low IQ.
obsessing with iq is a sign of low iq
>>81769098 (OP)better indicator of low iq, caring about iq. the only thing that matters is if you can afford to live without the internet, only workers need an internet connection and deal with electric smog. all the true high IQ people have homes in the middle of no where with no technology and just green space because thats the best thing for your baseline health
this is suifuel I never did good in school so I had to drop out now I might have to sell my bussy on the streets
>>81769137i'll be your first customer
>>81769098 (OP)i was in the gifted class back in school, shame i didnt get the encouragement i needed and home was hell - coulda been something, y'know?
the train's way past now, no use worrying about it
>>81769137post it, and i might buy 20 minutes of your time
>>81769129>with no technologyR-Ridiculous!!
What exactly is classified as technology?
You're saying we shouldn't be using computers?
That computers are bad for our health!?
>>81769137>might have to sell my bussy>>81769158>coulda been something>the train's way past nowWhat exactly is the problem? That you don't have high status? That you're a nobody? That you're worthless?
Why can't you value yourself? How intelligent are you? How fit are you? Is it good enough for you, or do you want more?
There's still more you can do. Even a little bit better is better than nothing.
>>81769098 (OP)When I started studying multivariable vector calculus I found that I had to actually dedicate time just to learn the concepts. I knew then that I was low IQ and dropped out.
>>81769512when your iq is low youre forced to have low value and homelessness. there is no life for us retards
>>81769512>is it good enough for you, or do you want more?its human nature to want more, anon
some folks might disagree and they're right too but the way society works is that abundance = good
i'm just a player and i'm playing the game, man - and the one rule is that more IS more
download
md5: 31b0426b9bd3980caf204cbb77802ba4
🔍
>you have ever questioned your own intellectual abilities
That's not quite fair. People are obtuse about this shit, too, anyway. If you're so obviously smarter than everyone around you that you'd legit have to be posturing dishonestly in order to pretend you weren't sure of it, that's Dunning-Kruger, but if you *do* question your own intellectual capacity, that's *also* because you're retarded. Self-assured because you truly never encounter intellectual difficulty? Dunning-kruger, you're stupid. A little more humble because you appreciate how complicated things really are? Nah, you're stupid or it'd be easy for you. Not that you'd be allowed to express how easy it was, or else you'd be a dunning-kruger dummy, only showing how out-of-his-depth he is.
Brilliant people are simultaneously so bright that it's impossible for average and comparatively imperceptive people to ignore or mistake it, and completely oblivious to that fact throughout their entire lives despite everyone blowing smoke up their ass for it constantly.
>>81769098 (OP)a sea monkey like me has a 68 iq sadly
>>81769098 (OP)gpt writing + serious jak
Oh, and while I'm fucking at it, let me just say:
The dichotomy you've presented between artsy/creative folks and people capable of complex abstraction/STEM types is false. STEM types ARE the creatives. They aren't opposite or antithetical. They are expressions of the same brilliance. Life isn't an RPG where if you have too many stat points in creativity it comes out of your INT. If anything-and this is brutal-dull people intellectually are dull creatively as well. Deadass, IQ contributes enough to the creative process that a brilliant person in mind has a much higher potential for artistic greatness than a dull person does. A work of art *absolutely* suffers when its creator is dull mentally. To even speak about intellect and artistic ability as separate things, rather than simply collapsing that into one name for the selfsame light, confuses the issue badly in this instance.
Think about the people you know. The smart people are the ones who draw and paint and play instruments, or who truly appreciate (read: sperg out over) media like music and film. Some of the smartest and most influential people I know in the STEM fields had children who were artists, and it's not like their kids came out bad at math. They came out exceptional at both.
Again, life isn't fair like that. You know how, despite Hollywood tropes, looks and intellect actually have a nasty habit of overlapping in the same person? Creativity, too. Brilliance is brilliance and it is truly unfair.
>>81769098 (OP)>Problems understanding mathematical logic. It is not worth making the excuse that "if I study, I can do well." The average person is not going to struggle with math, whether or not they study 'enough'. If you have to study a minimum, it's over.Yeah right, have it taught wrong by complete retards for 20 years and see how much you get calculus and signal theory without studying.
>>81769098 (OP)add in: "caring about or trusting iq tests"
i saw this vid of this guy who got qualified from mesna, Jeffery Ford. Top 0.1 percent highest IQ range tested at fucking mensa, had the certificate, gave ted talks.He said studying and effort matter more then talent, and i trust him over you. So kick rocks, dumbfuck
>>81769098 (OP)Steven Hawking: "People that boast of their IQ are losers."
Add in: Appealing to NDT, Stephen Hawking, Michio Kaku, etc. Anyone who was on a Science Channel special with a cool-colored, slowly moving CGI background of the solar system or a random molecule or some shit drifting lazily in the background while you're condescended-to about introductory-level science concepts.
Basically, it's a sign of low IQ-more a definitive diagnostic , really-if a person needs to appeal-to-authority using the smart science man he saw on TV. To this person, smart science man might as well be a wizard, and they invoke smart science man in arguments against people who make them feel threatened intellectually like Yugi busting out the fucking Pharaoh. Take it as a compliment of someone tries this on you; they've categorized you and Smart Science Man as appropriate opponents in their own mind while excluding themselves from that category. Sad, really.
>>81769623>when your iq is lowiq is just some jew's measure of intelligence. It is not set in stone.
Intelligence can be increased, it just takes effort and willingness.
It's worth a try, right? .
>>81769629You've clearly given up "the game."
Make and play your own (singleplayer) game.
>>81769098 (OP)>art, literature, psychology and philosophy are low IQWhat fucking kike wrote this?
My IQ was measured to be 96 and to be honest I can't bring myself to care. At least I'm not some 125 midwit who always falls just short of the mark in performance.
>>81769126this should've been /thread but sadly many people cannot tell bait when they see it
>not being overconfident in your IQ is low IQ>your have to perfectly remember everything you ever learned about math or you're low IQ>you have to work in STEM or you're low IQyou can SMELL the curry on OP's fingernails.
>>81770159>Make and play your own (singleplayer) game.sure, i'm enjoying it so far - but occasionally, you crave that multiplayer experience no?
>>81770229>i'm enjoying it so farAre you? Is improving yourself a part of that game?
I thought not since you are posting mopeily in this iq thread.
I think your singleplayer game is not good enough.
>occasionally, you crave that multiplayer experience no?But you have stagnated in that game... What's the point in playing when you'll do nothing?
