Why dont we just throw cameras into black holes to see what's inside?

>>81783179 (OP)
Because they're really far away and they'd just get crushed by the gravity

>>81783179 (OP)
Because that would destroy the camera and even if the camera were indestructible you wouldn't be able to get it back out to read the film or to transmit information from it through a mobile network since black holes don't let those kinds of things back out ever.

>>81783179 (OP)
and how do you get pictures back from the camera?

>>81783179 (OP)
there's probably nothing inside i mean it's called black hole so it's probably eternal darkness

>>81783207
Through the internet just like how we get pictures of Jupiter and shit

>>81783224
internet doesn't work in a black hole, silly

>>81783179 (OP)
You would have to put a string on it so you could reel it back out I don't think wifi works inside them

>>81783179 (OP)
Because theoretically if the camera isnt immediately imploded on itself, the transmitted radiowaves wouldnt make it back out of the black hole to convert to footage

>>81783179 (OP)
Quantum romanians steal them.

>>81783255
What if we had a super stretchy cable connecting to the camera, so we get a live stream as it falls in

>>81783179 (OP)
black holes are not made of atoms a black hole is a REALLY BIG atom and the laws of the chaos of the universe says this type of matter is stronger than everything else except for a specific type of quantum mechanics which cause the black hole to deteriorate over time
a black hole isnt really a hole its more like a rock which eats everything but rare quantum particles
i dont really think of it as a hole in space more of like a artifact of another universe physics which is stronger than most the quantum mechanics our notion of physics uses to build the universe

>>81783269
Just use a fiber optic cable like the ukraine drones

>>81783327
the cable and all its signals fall in too

>>81783327
That's risky because what if you get dragged in? Rock climbers dont tether together for this reason.

>>81783433
Could we have a camera on top of the black hole, and have it zoom into the center?

>>81783433
It's on a really long reel though so you just let it fall. When you hardwire internet it just works unlike wifi

>>81783179 (OP)
It would get ripped apart

spacetime continuum
>not original kek

>>81783179 (OP)
Black holes themselves are invisible, so it's impossible to ever photograph one. At most you can photograph the silhouette of one from the acceleration disk around them, but only if there is anything around the black hole. Making this a moot point.
Even if by some magic you could, the camera would have to be able to withstand impossible levels of radiation, and crushing tidal forces before it even enters the acceleration disk of the black hole.
If somehow that were possible to resolve, time dilation would interfere with communications so significantly you'd be unable to retrieve the data. Which will get worse the closer it gets to the event horizon.
Now say you could solve all of this. Once the camera crosses the event horizon it would be impossible for the camera to send back anything, or for the camera to be retrieved. And the camera itself would see absolutely nothing.

Black holes have the strongest gravity even outside them. The gravity is so strong that it would destroy the camera even if it came a little bit close to it.

The reason why things don't come back out of black holes is because things are not as bad on the other side. They don't want you to know this that's why there are so many lies about black holes. Nooooo, don't think about that. Black holes uhhhh, suck. Hehe, yeah! they suck. Suck so bad like a million gravities! You would surely die.

>>81783752
What about an adamantium camera with a diamond fiber optic cable

>>81783179 (OP)
we could, but then how would we pull out the data?
>inb4 wireless camera
the signal would fall into the black hole along with the camera so again, how would we pull that data from it?

>>81783834
Same as how we handle drone jammers, with a spool of fiber optic cable

>>81783831
is this a troll?
>>81783875
light cant escape the event horizon. that fiber optic cables going to be atomized within milliseconds

>>81783179 (OP)
Anything that crosses the event horizon is effectively not a part of our universe anymore, light can not escape, and no physical object can travel at the speed of light. What is inside of a black hole? A neutron star, most likely.

>>81783179 (OP)
Do you actually know how a black hole works? It's mass that warps space-time into a sphere.