>MegaGlobohomo: Ultra wealthy and powerful control the world, one world government, they enjoy their control but let us live in good conditions. Everyone is happy, no religion, LGBT+ running rampant, lots of censorship and control, nothing happens, chance of being "calmed down" through chemicals for easier control.
>MAGA-Imperialism: WW3, you can say whatever against minorities, rich elites hoard all the wealth for themselves, everyone's poor except for the technocrats, white people dying of starvation, mass surveillance, everyone's shot by drones the moment they criticize the elites or government, every country is out for themselves.

>>81786466 (OP)
not reading that but thanks for the Tifa pic

>>81786466 (OP)
I choose secret option Q:
>MegaHornyMinotaurs: The government breeds Chads into Minotaurs with big fat cocks and they roam the streets and they rape the shit out of anyone they see in public.

>>81786466 (OP)
I don't see much difference between the 2. Both involve a tyrannical govt of some kind. Globohomo is bad.

>>81786466 (OP)
We getting the worst of both

>>81786466 (OP)
Definitely 1 and I think anyone choosing 2 are either fooling themselves or are mentally ill.

Of course the censorship and control in 1 is not good, however it sounds like this applies for scenario 2 too, only in an even worse and more violent way, so what exactly are the benefits of 2 that would make this an even remotely even comparison?

>>81786856
yeah that's what i was thinking. maybe in 2 you could have a small chance of freedom in the chaos? or maybe you get to kill people or whatever and some people find that more ballsy than being some regulated slave. so i suppose for people who like war aesthetics as well.

>>81786466 (OP)
hmmm both sound kinda bad, but im not white so ill choose megaGlobohomo

>>81786466 (OP)
I choose gentile rebellion and a future of ultranationalism and the destruction of Israel.

>>81786466 (OP)
>but let us live in good conditions.
this one