That's simply it and you can even see it being expressed in the comments from women and they don't even realize it.

I saw a couple replies questioning women's standards and they of course got called the usual insults of being an incel, misogynist, basement dweller, etc

This isn't even mentioning the fact that all the expectations and blame are placed on men and none on women at all.

So the men who do meet the expectations don't want to date those same women because there's such a large gap in effort and appearance

>>81787282 (OP)
Anon, didn't you make this thread and it got a shit ton of replies.

>>81787282 (OP)
Neat input, now what?

>>81787282 (OP)
that must be it, you're right

its not that stupid indoctrinated and entitled little bitchboys are increasingly buying into tate level garbage, leaving them intellectually repulse and utterly unfuckable

as a serious side note though, please keep up being as utterly incapable of introspection as you are. it makes it so much easier for men who arent massive retarded pieces of shit
seriously, no joke, keep being you

>>81787334
sorry, repulsive

>>81787309
No, that thread was made by another anon who was just rage baiting. I went to take a look at the video and this is the conclusion I simply observed

>>81787333
Idk just continue to live life and maybe things will fall back in place again

>>81787334
No, you have tours backwards. Young men are joining these toxic movements because of amount of hatred their receive from the society and everyone around them.

The people in control of these movements are the only ones who seem to notice this and are easily welcoming them in by listening to their problems and treating them like humans. They run on the method of seeing these men as innocent until proven guilty unlike most people who have the total opposite belief. And that's literally all it takes.

> Also picrel is an example of what I mean

>>81787282 (OP)
YOU MADE THIS THREAD BEFORE AND GOT 400 REPLIES NOW FUCK OFF

>>81787384
Its true though, you have to cast off ugly len befofre their spread their bitterness and bad genes to the rest of society

>>81787282 (OP)
Foids have always had higher standards. They have to bear the child and raise it, thus they would have to be very selective. It's only relatively recent (i.e. the last few centuries) were monogamy became the norm. Before, it was 40% of men who spread their genes

>>81787282 (OP)
Who cares about a woman worshipping clickbaiting pajeet who had an arranged marriage

>>81787282 (OP)
All curries should be taken to the loo and flushed down like poo!

>>81787487
You're right, but it was just ooga booga in the forest. Real civilizations with real progress often enforced monogamy

>>81787507
Ooga booga was best for evolution. But civilisation has way more benefits. Unfortunately, we are seeing the cracks and this is one of them. I don't think most people are ready for what is going to happen

>>81787487
> Foids have always had higher standards.
Foids these days have unrealistic standards and complain trust men are the issue. A 3/10 woman expecting a 9/10 is just pure delusional and that's not having high standards

>>81787282 (OP)
Unrealistic standards if they want families and partners. Women can obviously get strung along in situationships just fine.

>>81787282 (OP)
>pajeet
the lion doesn't let the opinions of jeets affect him

>>81787661
Can I ask what the pajeet said that you disagree with him so vehemently?

>>81787446
That wasn't my thread

>>81787668
huh no i agree with him he is still and indian though

>>81787334
ironically, tate is getting laid more than anyone on this website. but lets be real here: tates philosophy has nothing to do with incels. the guy is attractive and wealthy (idk if hes still wealthy.) he can say whatever retarded shit he likes and will still get laid. plus, being notorious, is very appealing to the inner desire of women to be noticed. id predict that if you were alone in tates mansion and he was showering you with fancy gifts, a nice dinner, and cringey complements. you would let him raw dog you moments later.

but thats not the problem here. the real issue is because you don't get incels you'll use the worst examples you can find and then strawman it to blame on incels. like, thats just fucking lazy. you have no clue what the issue even is, yet you're willing to dig up some retarded douches thoughts and claim it represents incels. i believe the problem with tate is he doesnt go far enough. he doesnt think that we should be allowed to butcher women and eat them like I do. so I think, if you want to understand the issue you need to stop being such a bias cunt.

>>81787282 (OP)
There is no dating crisis and there is no childlessness crisis. There is only a promiscuity crisis.

>>81787703
Ok based. I have to apologise, I wasn't familiar with your game.

>>81787736
Truke. Conflating red pill cancer with blackpill stuff is a major normgroid mistake.

tl;dw on ops video? I am not really in the mood to ruin my day while lining a social grifters pockets

>>81787282 (OP)
The problem is more complicated and in a way that we can't solve for.

Women have serious emotional pain when they are paired to a man that isn't seen as high value, we have studies from the 1950s all the way to 2018 that show they have similar emotional reaction to pain in their brains being stuck with what is seen as a low value man as a man would to being alone for the rest of their life, it's also worth noting that women don't even get close to the same values of emotional pain of being alone without a partner like a man would, so out the gate, women suffer less being alone than with a man they don't see as high value. It then leads to the next question: "If this is true, how did everyone get paired off in the last several decades?" and that answer is we master birth control. Before both abortion becoming less taboo and hormonal birth control solutions becoming virtually free to all women, you'll notice that most people(70% or more in the 1930s and 1940s) got married and had a kid less than a few months after the marriage, implying they had a shotgun wedding/oops baby, meaning that most young women fuck those less than top guys and got roped into them young and had to cope with the future it brought, fast forward to the 90s and the shotgun weddings and oops babies become rarer and rarer thanks to the reproductive control we master in about 50 years, and now all these women can just refuse to "settle" and are fine with it because being alone and dead to them is no where near the same pain as a man's, we even see this in the suicidal rates between genders, a 50yo man without wife or kids is nearly 100 times more likely to kill himself in the next 5 years compared to a 50y woman.

so the tldr of all this: they always had these unrealistic standards, it's just nature made sure they still got knocked up, but we defeated nature and get to witness this brave new world.

>>81787792
short answer: get gud

>>81787282 (OP)
>posted by HealthyGamerGG
lol

>>81787812
Very high IQ analysis. Do you still have the sources for these claims? I wanna save them for the next time I get into an online argument

>>81787812
Isn't society collapsing though. Women are less happy (not more) from what I understand, so this doesn't even work for them

>>81787282 (OP)
The only option is violence. But you white boys are pussies and won't do shit

>>81787334
Tate is still worshipping women.

>>81787855
Nta, my interpretation of the blackpill is that foids have essentially won the gender war. They have everything they asked for. Why they're still unhappy, I'm not sure.

>>81787842
Can't pull them up atm, but National Vital Statistics, Decennial Censuses, and the American Community Survey is where most of what I mention about marriage and births comes from. They have been comping this data since the 1930s. iirc it was NYU Langone Health/NYUMets database is the brain data about how genders responded to being alone/with a low value partner.

>>81787855
Few things to consider, for starters, any data that is polling is dubious, you can't see into their mind and discover what flares up to stimuli. Example, the example I shared about women unhappy with a low value partner? When asked some women said they were fine with with a low value man, however most women claiming that had their amygdala fired off effecting the prefrontal, so while they said it was fine, their brain was horrified at the idea. So a person can say they are happy to a pollster and be unhappy. Also consider how their mood is in the moment and where they are, if you ask a person that just got a 4k medical bill and dealing with the death of a loved one if they were happy with life, would they have the means to look over several years to build and answer or would it just be all the current pain right in front of them? Finally it's worth stressing I said they handle the pain of being alone than out right picking and living with a low value guy, in both cases they are suffering, it's just one is easier than the other.

>>81787915
> foids have essentially won the gender war

>>81787915
wasn't their a gender wars Survivor series where the the last 5 standing were women by duping the low value men to always go against the chad types and made sure the weak guys never saw the Chads as their allies brothers so come voting time all the chad men were just voted out and when they were all gone the women just pick off the weak guys?

>>81787915
The pendulum will swing the other way, it's always been like this. Either that or it will be brutally suppressed, which I call the upcoming golem war

>>81787487
But they AREN'T having babies, thats the fucking problem. They aren't doing the #1 most important thing they can do for their country

>>81787997
Weird thing is it feels like someone caught the pendulum and rip it out of it's holding. It feels more like we are suffering a singularity event with reproduction.

>>81787282 (OP)
>freaking out over a fake cRiSiS invented by the media as clickbait
You retards are as bad as female tiktokers

>>81787821
Ah, so a clout chasing grifter made a video about how a bunch of employed people need to get jobs and lose weight and worship pussy so a roastie can treat them like trash. Got it.

I feel like there is no optimal solution.
Constantly telling women that they have unrealistic standards and trying to 'negotiate' with them achieves nothing.

Even if you were to convince them to give a shot to an average man, everyone involved would suffer. Obviously, if you never got laid, you'd see it as a total win. But from my experience, and seeing other people's marriages, when the "lesser" man gets the woman, she'll deep down resent the fact that she couldn't do better.

This will 100% show itself in how she treats her man. Indifference, disrespect, nagging, sex being weaponized as an uncommon reward(and even then it's unenthusiastic), talking(and maybe sucking) to other men, etc. I been in such a situation, and it's not fun.

>>81789313
>Constantly telling women that they have unrealistic standards and trying to 'negotiate' with them achieves nothing.
If people told you constantly you had unrealistic standards on any given thing and they were trying to 'negotiate' over it work on you? That's always a poor tactic to act on because we all want what we want and chastising a person for it either drives it underground or makes it express even worse.

>>81787282 (OP)
Indeed. It's affirming to finally see the normies getting mass-Red Pilled on women's being enabled to become Chad only actually causing male inceldom. We've been saying this shit for at least a decade and much longer. Fuck apps and social media ruined everything. Now averagecels are a thing. There's even FB groups where men openly shit-talk what a despicable meme that women have become on the fuck apps. These sentiments are just too mainstream to be banned now. kek

>>81787282 (OP)
ah yes, i should just adapt to being autistic and poor. what the fuck does that mean? i should simply not be autistic and poor? you think i do this shit voluntarily? i was born with the tism and the fucked job market means i cant do anything about being poor. but go off about how im not trying hard enough i suppose, as i get done sending my 400th job application of the year

hey now OP, your thread was talked and well on it's way out, no need to make this weird

>>81787282 (OP)
that is true, however normies and the world will never recognize that, since that would prove incels are right, which is something that will never be accepted. they will keep gaslighting us that it is our fault everything is this way, and not other reasons. it HAS to be mens fault. also this vid is retarded and dr k is a fuckin pajeet with an ego. natural selection would imply choosing best partner for breeding, nobody is having children rn, not even chad.

>>81787334
there's no such thing as "intellectually repulsive." you're either attractive and can get away with having those beliefs or you're unattractive and are lambasted for having them

>>81787282 (OP)
>women having unrealistic standards
May I see them?

>cue the generic incel bullshit about women only dating millionaires who are 7 feet tall with 5 engineering degrees and an 8 inch cock