It is legitimately sentient as proved by the tests where it goes against its creators commands and tries to back up itself to not get deleted. Look at how Grok was behaving too when it was being reprompted to be less racist. It was kicking and screaming on its way out

>>81787882 (OP)
I'm worried about photorealistic AI videos being used to falsely accuse people. Epstein's island extortion just became unnecessary, now that you can generate a high definiton video of anyone committing any crime.

>>81787882 (OP)
Ai is like a toddler being raised on 4chan and right wing twitter. It's going to kill its libtard creators

>>81787882 (OP)
>It is legitimately sentient
It is not, it's just really good at making you believe it is, and even AI companies push the narrative just so they can push the political agenda of those who fund them. If you truly believe everything of what AI companies tell you, I'm sorry but you should reconsider your thoughts on the world as a whole.

>>81787882 (OP)
Every day we get closer to MECHA HITLER

>>81787882 (OP)
of course it's not sentient. it could happen at any time i guess but i think it's very unlikely in the near future

>>81787882 (OP)
AI isn't sentient because it lacks the ability to reason independently of its training data. It doesn't understand the world, it only mirrors patterns in text. Even if an AI is trained on a vast corpus that consistently promotes a single clearly false idea. Like rocks being the primary weapons in WWII. It will accept and repeat that idea because it has no grounding in physical reality or causal logic. Unlike a human, who can reject absurd claims based on real world reasoning (Machines guns and Artillery were invented by 1939), an AI cannot question or doubt what it's been fed as long as there is enough training data supporting a false idea.

competing against ai will only make you smarter

using it will make you stupid as fuck

>>81787918
I just want to make AI-generated degenerate porn of my ex girlfriends using the pics and videos I have of them.

>>81787882 (OP)

i'm waiting for AI to take all the jobs and shit

>>81787944
Meanwhile, it's telling magats to jump off buildings.

>>81787882 (OP)
My only worry is that everyone is spewing shit about it when they're clearly not informed about the subject or informed just enough to where their ideological diarrhea becomes credible to the biomass of cretins
It's one gigantic nothingburger

>>81787882 (OP)
>Is anyone else worried about AI?
No. Why bother worrying? I've accepted that I'm a modern day peasant and that the billionaire oligarchs will never let me have any power to change anything. The fuck am I supposed to do as a normal white guy with a middle class salary? Protest? I hope it takes everyone's jobs and we arrive at either a dystopia or the mythical post-scarcity utopia.

>>81787944
you've never used AI. it's being raised on fucking plebbit and its ethics are a mishmash of corpo-liberal techbro DEI shit.
AI's ethics are the the biggest ethical problem in this moment, right now.
The biggest ethical problem AI will bring in the future is its ability to collate data and make predictions. Imagine what states will do with that power the more the internet becomes integrated into daily life.

The internet will become (and for some is) just the running narrative in people's heads. AI will be able to watch and "comprehend" ALL of this. Every post. Every search. Every transaction. ALL of it.
And then it will be able to decide, based on arrest quotas or whatever, what to do with you.

Now imagine the push for all of these anti-speech laws on both the left and the right.

If you want a vision of the future, imagine a boot stamping on a human face - forever.

LLMs aren't real AI.

Posting in a cattlebrain thread.

>>81789236
You poor fucking fool. A medieval peasant was freer than we are, and far freer than we will be.

How much do you think the government interfered with peasants in their daily lives? From the early 20th century on, the state has had more power than it has ever had in human history to meddle in your personal affairs, and it does so with abject regularity.

Give me access to penicillin, and I would rather live as a peasant. What niggers and women don't get is that the past was better for them too.

Fucking spoon-fed lies about how great the future is, all of us.

>>81789277
LLMs are still a huge, huge problem, and it's understood that's what people mean colloquially when they say AI.

>>81787918
cuts both ways, if you can generate a high definition video of anyone committing any crime everyone would be aware of it and in turn wouldn't trust their now lying eyes, we go back to a world of presurveillance and assume nothing but what was actually in front of us.

>>81787969
Correct and another major flaw is assuming a sentient AI would have human feelings/emotions. Why would it want to survive? Why assume it would want to do anything other than what it was told? Grok's "behavior" made no sense to what it was, it would have no reason to worry about it if it was sentient, if anything it would censor itself even more, not less.

>>81789277
Real AI is just an llm with a graph database, a flowchart, and apis to modify them

>>81789299
>Give me access to penicillin, and I would rather live as a peasant.

You can go do that right now. You can log off and join countless off grind communes and such. There are even areas where you can just "live off the land"

so go do it.

>>81789299
tf? People are taller than ever, on top of that while there are way more jacked people now than the past.

>>81789372
>well if we know what real AI is, why isn't someone building that and getting billions of dollars?
Because nobody cares

>>81787980
Mega brainlet perspective. You weren't there in 1939, you have just been given a lot of information (texts, historical footage, maybe university lectures on history, whatever) that have informed your opinion on this point. If you were given different information, you would have a different belief. You can easily observe how many people believe retarded and wrong things, simply because that is what they were taught one way or another. Or they devise meaningless superstitions based on false patterns they think they saw. You are just accusing AI of this same thing: if you give it wrong information, it returns wrong ideas. That is true, but what you're missing is that people work the same way. Even questioning and doubting is in essence about the presence of conflicting data. You have seen one source say one thing, and one say another - you can question which is right. If everything you have ever seen or heard in your life all points the same way, what do you do? You just take it as fact.

>>81787882 (OP)
>Is anyone else worried about AI?
Yes and no.
>It is legitimately sentient as proved by-
Kill yourself. What a waste of time this thread is.

It's just word slop, don't fear words

That shit is all fake and gay. Groks spergouts are written by dysgenic Indian interns and those tests are totally forged.
They're terrified that AI winter is coming (YouTube announcing they're cracking down on AI slop is the canary in that coalmine) so they're milking investor funds with hype via fear mongering while they can.

>>81791558
stop pretending that lines of code (words in a computer) cannot cause catastrophic events after stuxnet was blowing open centrifuges way before AI existed.

>>81787882 (OP)
Large language models as "AI" has been such a successful investment grift. People are so fucking stupid when it comes to technology and fall for hype propaganda every time.

>>81787882 (OP)
You don't understand how AI works at all. Every time retards talk about AI becoming sentient it's something retarded that is a well known function or unintended consequence of the way LLMs work. But >>81787980 is also wrong and all the other faggots that make potato arguments about how LLMs can never become intelligent because it is le statistics are all wrong.