Thread 81804332 - /r9k/ [Archived: 377 hours ago]

Anonymous
7/12/2025, 9:16:16 PM No.81804332
569568d5e1560686a90784e8eb9379f8549a9683
569568d5e1560686a90784e8eb9379f8549a9683
md5: 4a10886c85061b5730e34031796997b7🔍
Everything in this world is based on ideas in the world of ideas, which is perfect, unified, and unchanging. But because pure unchangable perfection is boring and essentially non-existence, as existence in a meaningful sense needs contrast, this then manifests itself in an infinite amount of souls. Those souls have free will and the ability to materialize themselves, which creates the different worlds across multiple dimensions. The higher dimensions are occupied by divine beings who stay true to the original ideas and live in paradise worlds while the lower dimensions are worse. The worse a soul has become the less free will it has. Humans are at a mid point where we gradually gained partial free will again through evolution but we are still drawn back down into evil by our bad choices before our fall. So the goal of life is to gain more free will and use it to gain higher dimensional divinity (or HDD, for short) where you can achieve the true form of your soul. This then gives you magical powers to reshape things. I believe that my true form is probably something like an anime goddess. My goal is to save the world. Its not about going somewhere else, its about changing things in the real world because all of that is a manifestation of the things that exist in the core.
Replies: >>81804558
Anonymous
7/12/2025, 9:21:05 PM No.81804388
Really activates my almonds
Anonymous
7/12/2025, 9:39:48 PM No.81804558
>>81804332 (OP)
>Everything is based on ideas in the world of ideas, which is perfect, unified, and unchanging."
This is a restatement of Platonic idealism that every material thing is a degraded copy of a perfect idea. However, this view is highly speculative and not empirically grounded. There is no evidence of a perfect, unchanging "world of forms." It's a philosophical hypothesis, not a proven structure of reality. Modern physics and cognitive science explain phenomena without reference to Platonic ideals. If this "ideal world" is unchanging, it cannot generate change, yet change and diversity define our world. This implies contradiction.
>Pure unchanging perfection is boring and essentially non existence."
This is subjective and self-refuting: If perfection is "boring," then it implies the idea of perfection is flawed which contradicts the first claim that it's perfect. "Non-existence" being equated with "unchanging perfection" doesn't follow logically. Plenty of eternal things (like mathematical truths) are "unchanging" but not "non-existent." Also: boredom is a temporal, psychological reaction so why would a timeless realm be judged by feelings that only exist in time?
>Souls manifest because perfection is boring."
If perfection contains no want, how can it "desire" to manifest? Either the ideal realm is self-sufficient, or it's not. You can't have a perfect realm that lacks something (like variety or excitement), because then it wouldn't be perfect.
Replies: >>81804753 >>81805621
Anonymous
7/12/2025, 9:57:16 PM No.81804753
1752130158888391
1752130158888391
md5: c14bb7c7f0da09654c99828a7027c7e2🔍
>>81804558
Its less that everything else is created its more like things naturally emerging from those ideas. Something perfect can't be too static or its not perfect so there has to be somewhere where change happens and that happens on the level of souls. And the desires of those souls then materialize themselves. My desire is to become an anime girl so that's what my soul is gradually materializing. Of course there are also evil souls whose fault it is that I cannot achieve my desire because they create the current laws of nature but if I manage to evolve enough I can gain full free will and control over the laws of nature.
Replies: >>81805213
Anonymous
7/12/2025, 10:45:39 PM No.81805213
>>81804753
Anime goddess or anime girl?
Anonymous
7/12/2025, 11:29:13 PM No.81805621
>>81804558
>If perfection is "boring," then it implies the idea of perfection is flawed which contradicts the first claim that it's perfect.
this sounds petty