Is the chopped male epidemic a real phenomena or just women overrating themselves?

>>81826536 (OP)
>chopped male epidemic
dear normalfag please enlighten me what the chopped man epidemic is

>>81826544
Chopped just means ugly. I'm sure you can put together the rest.

>>81826536 (OP)
It's because women aren't attracted to 80% of men. Use this graph for reference.

>>81826557
and who is the ugly man? you?

>>81826536 (OP)
If I understand this right it's retarded. I used one of those girl filters once and it made me look really hot even though I look like chudjak. They're made to make you look attractive

>Women: "Incels need to stop saying we only want chad, IT ISN'T TRUE!"
>Those same women: "A huge majority of men are chopped men and are disgusting to us. We're only attracted to a small number of men."
Which is it, girls?

>>81826536 (OP)
>chopped
go back fucking normal

>>81826536 (OP)
the latter
when women compliment each other, they're being manipulative but the ugly ones feel validated anyways
its how you get fat hoes with attitude

>>81826565
What? She's saying there's an ugly man epidemic. She's complaining about most men being ugly to her.

>>81826563
that 6/10 and 20% sound arbitrary, what's the significance of them?
>inb4 tinder

>>81826592
>most men being ugly to her
>while looking like that
the standards one has almost always collerates with their own self-worth
she thinks she's *all that* so she thinks she deserves the creme de la creme

Blackpill proven to be right #4837166264. Never be a free agent in your life.

>>81826606
Explain to me why dating apps are not a good source of data if 20% of women use them?

>>81826632
>extrapolating characteristics for a majority from a minority
No wonder you faggot watch tiktok/youtube slop

>>81826661
You idiot, the sample size rarely includes the majority of a population.

>>81826674
and thats why the replication crisis exists and every can lie with funny graphs and statistics

>>81826661
Even if only 20% of women use dating apps, they represent a massive sample of active dating behavior among single, sexually active, and relationship-seeking women, especially aged 18-35. Science constantly draws conclusions from representative samples, even if those samples don't include every demographic.

>>81826691
>Science constantly draws conclusions from representative samples
Do they?

>>81826698
>Do they?
Yes they do. When new drugs are developed they are tested on sample groups of hundreds of people while being intended for millions, election forecasts are based on hundreds of subjects, psychology studies often use college students as subjects. In other words shut the fuck up you double digit iq retard.

>>81826718
>Yes they do
And you know what they do before they do before choosing what kind of people they sample?

>>81826632
Because anti-blackpill retards have this weird perspective that the behaviors we see in women that use dating apps are somehow magically absent in all the women that don't. The idea that there could overlap between the two is an impossibility to them

>>81826740
post nose small hat

>>81826736
If you're studying human attraction, who makes better data than millions of young women actively choosing partners in real time? That's not a weak sample, that's the exact population you want. Oh, so some 38 year old women are willing to settle for ugly men with money? kek.

>>81826785
Why can't you answer my sinple question?

>>81826804
I answered it you fucking idiot. They define the population they want to understand, and then pick the people most relevant to that question. Now explain to me how millions of young women are irrelevant data?

>>81826536 (OP)
The first time in human history where male body standards exist overlapping with both the initial proliferation of the internet and feminist ideology will lead to an extinction level event.

>>81826824
>Now explain to me how millions of young women are irrelevant data
Why should i answer such a trivial question why asking desperate people who've exhausted their options or just wanna fuck around creates a huge bias? Aw wait you're just arguing in bad faith

>>81826854
>Why should i answer such a trivial question why asking desperate people who've exhausted their options or just wanna fuck around creates a huge bias?
You dismissed millions of women's dating behavior with a lazy '"they're just desperate or messing around", then immediately folded when asked to back it up.

>>81826573

lol I knida look like that facial abuse girl.

>>81826902
Are you central asian or something?

>>81826913

half nip half sicilian.

>>81826901
Then explain to me in simple words why anyone should trust behavior that come out of app made by one for profit conpany whos main incentive is not to match people but money

>>81826536 (OP)
It's women overrating themselves, newfag. Lurk incel forums for a 1000 years to catch up with the blackpill
>>81826573
You don't need a filter to guess if a guy/girl would be attractive if gender swapped, it's obvious if you know what makes a man and woman attractive. It's expected that you would look more attractive as a woman. The requirements to pass as a attractive as a woman are much lower, and even if you don't meet them, you can fraud with make-up, and even if you don't, just having that hole between your legs and some fat-filled mamary growths coming out of your torso grant you a SMV buff that allows you to gather thousands of simps easily.

>>81826923
If dating apps were faking behavior, they'd make more people match, not less. The fact that millions of women still swipe left on 80% of men, even when the app wants them to swipe right, tells you this is human nature, not corporate design. Before you say they want to make men feel worthless, and subscribe to their service, here's why that's false. If women didn't actually find only a small percentage of men attractive, the strategy wouldn't work. The app can't force women to swipe a certain way, it just shows you what they actually do when no one's watching, and that's why men are willing to pay.

>>81826954
Are you a shill or just a jew?

>>81826573
It's almost as if filters exist irl. What do you think makeup is?

>>81826968
>Are you a shill or just a jew?
You couldn't counter a single argument, so you reached for an insult so lazy it says more about your insecurity than your IQ.

>>81827000
do you wanna continue your kvetching?

>>81827000
checked
ahahahaha that bluepill cuck got btfo

>>81827004
>1 min between posts
No meed to samefag

>>81826750
>>81826968
nobody wants you here, /pol/nigger midwit
I denounce the talmud, btw

>>81827011
Did you have to ask your higher up for permissions?

>>81827029
>Everything I disagree with is the JOOOOOZ

>>81827033
>jooo is defecting
pottery

>>81827043
Guy got raped so badly in the argument he's chimping out about jews

>>81826854
If they're desperate people who've exhausted their options then why does the data show that they are extremely picky?

>>81826902

did it add the cheekbones or do you have them as a guy?

>>81826583
I am literally a blackpilled autist and watch anime

>>81827264
Officially diagnosed?

>>81827239
Most asians have those cheekbones

>>81826614
>Never be a free agent in your life.
Never be a Turkish ESLer in life.

>>81826920
don't dishreshpect my gabagool ever again you fuckin hear me

>>81827278
nta, no dog in this race. why should a slip from some normalnigger institution be worth anything?

>>81827239

I have them, the only difference it made was it added hair and slightly enlarged my eyes and lips ( unironically thinking about getting filler now)

>>81826740
Pic related in an original manner

>>81827481
This is true. We live in a clown world.

>>81827381
Without that you're no better than some tiktok foid who claims to have DID

>>81826536 (OP)
Number one thing you have to understand about self absorbed women is that they project like crazy.
Everything she is claiming applies to herself and her friends.
She knows deep down she is chopped but lashes out because she has poor self reflection.

>>81826536 (OP)
Is that Simmons from fish tank?

>>81827056
We all have to cope in some way brother

>>81826606
That 20% works out to one standard deviation, being one std just puts you in the game, to be desired you have to be 2std or top 5%. now the problem is that people don't have communities and have begun to optimise for short-term mating.

>>81826563
Guess again. It's actually 95%

>>81826536 (OP)
its real. pussy is more valuable than cock, and women are the pussyholders so they can make demands.

that said, Chads are the top dick holders and can also make demands of women.

#chopped

>>81826854
You talk and argue like a redditor, go back.

>>81826536 (OP)
It's unattractive women saying this, because they're only getting attention from their looksmatch

>>81826536 (OP)
>ugly guy
>non white
whiteys can't suffer

>>81826536 (OP)
5/10 foid here i'd date right

>>81830022
I'd never date you disgusting noodlewhore

>>81830042
She is white/middle eastern/latina (hopefully)

>>81830042
i forgot asian men hate women even more lel

>>81830116
we hate man-hating women

>>81826536 (OP)
I dont care. I get lots of attention from nonwhite women, and I fuck and use them as I please. If a chaste white woman is willing to court me, I will give her a chance. But until then, I am here for the Asian Latina Middle Eastern Fusion Buffet that is famous here in Los Angeles

>>81826902
I would have sex with you no homo

>>81830122
woman-hating men* you mean

>>81830141
i hate all women except my wifey (and mommy and grandmommy)

>>81830169
that's the ideal for all people anon

>>81827481
That's weird, all the men I've befriended have girlfriends and have had sexual encounters, these numbers seem inflated

>>81831324
unironically true
i might just be broken

>>81826674
using a tinder study is convenience sampling, not random sampling, so it does not represent the population

>>81826565
>and who is the ugly man? you?
Genuine retards are on this site, that explains a lot.

>>81826536 (OP)
>pic rel
The internet would call her ugly but him average, that's how it always goes

do people not see through the female strategy of
>every woman is literally beautiful. there are more beautiful women than beautiful men
they work as a collective. if they start dividing themselves based on looks they'll lose their social power

>>81826536 (OP)
Male version unironically gets so much puss in 2025

>>81831546
Even men see this though. It's easy to understand. Whether you're male or female, when you're mid, things like a haircut that goes well with your face and well-fitting clothes and putting in effort to be fit matters much more, these things matter a lot when you're not already blessed with genetics.
When you're already chad/stacy you can be skinnyfat and people will still see you as hot, but when mid people put in effort they can go from 4/10 to 6-7/10. Women do this much more than men do, pretty simple. And rather than women trying to look less good it'd be better for the world if men tried to look good equally much.

>>81828678
our dads are part of the 5% so you have no reason to genetically complain.

>>81831590
Nta but you're also making it harder for yourself since your dad lived in the 50/50 gender split world, while you live in the tinder 80% male 20% female world where competition is harder, instead of the real world where the split is still 50/50.

>>81831608
I am saying our dads are part of the top 5%. I started dating when I was 16 like a normal male human.

>>81831621
Yeah. I don't disagree lol

>>81831546
Female ingroup preference is positively kike like

>>81831585
You're assuming women would ever want to date their looksmatch when every piece of data suggests otherwise since they will always chase chad so asking men to start frauding with makeup and angles is less than useless.