This weird pearl clutching that has gone into overdrive over the past 5 years about how "porn addiction" is some big problem (it isnt) and how we have to protect the kids from it instead of calling out shit parents who don't want to watch their kids is so fucking dumb. It's insane how the same niggas who think that illegal immigrants Muslims would invade and force sharia law think it's ok for the government to enforce penis inspection on my cock by forcing my to take a picture of it next to my state ID just to make sure I'm not a minor or something. All just to see nearly the same amount of tits and ass that a 13 year old can find on twitch without an account, and without having their fucking ID in a database ready for breaching.

>>81853033 (OP)
Don't care, didn't read, you can't breed and you are worse than worthless, you make everybody else's life worse with your own existence.

>>81853033 (OP)
Porn should have been banned during the moral panic of the 80's. The whore/simp economy is fake and gay.

>>81853033 (OP)
Do care, did read, you can breed (if you believe in yourself) and you are worthwhile, you make everybody else's life better with your own existence.

>>81853033 (OP)
Shit parents do NOT get called out enough for how much damage they do. Kids in public will just be glued to their screen addicted to brainrot, blasting it while the parents do nothing. And then the same neglectful parents will end up surprised when their kids end up addicted to worse things. Kids in public doing literal crimes? Again, parents' fault, the retarded justice system is literally not allowed to stop them.
And then you have narcissistic parents who will actively make their children's life a living hell if despite how fucked up the world is, they manage to show signs that they'll grow up to be successful. Fuck.

>>81853033 (OP)
>seething defense of jewish mind control media

>>81853356
do you think if i strapped you to a chair and forced you to watch sisy hypno videos in a dark room for a week that you would suddenly gain the urge to crossdress and get fucked in the ass?

>>81853384
yes that's my biggest fear, please don't do that to me aaaah terrifying

>>81853384
The fact that you and I even know what sissy hypno is proof that it works.

>>81853033 (OP)
>Muslims would invade and force sharia law
They're only upset about that because of jealousy. They would love for a dead rabbi to make all the rules while a man in a dress enforces those rules with violence. We need to stop pretending there are big differences in the religious (especially Abrahamic ones), they all generally boil down to the same shit.

>>81853033 (OP)
This post just stinks of capitulation, like we all know everything is wrong but you are so sick of being on the losing side that you lie to yourself: "This is okay, in fact it is BETTER this way." You're weak, you don't have any principles, it is EASY to fix these societal problems if you dare to CARE about them at all, but instead you are fucking lazy and worthless and roll over again and again, losing more and more ground until there isn't anything left.

>>81853033 (OP)
But how will they push internet licenses that they can revoke over saying the wrong thing if we don't do it for the children?
Not only that blaming porn and videogames is a perfect scapegoat for men dropping out of society and not working long hours for shit pay and getting married to trash women who treat divorce as a cash and prizes reward program. If we stopped blaming porn and videogames for societal issues despite that videogames and porn have been around forever and all of these problems magically became issues once social media came into existence, we would have to blame all of our big tech donors and they said they don't wanna be regulated.
Next you'll say men need things like livable wages, equal treatment from the courts, and women who are worth a fuck to be societal slaves. And we can't do that cause single moms and simps might get angry.
And please don't bring up how much porn and sex is on child approved platforms, our tech overlords say its super important we keep this on children's platforms.

>>81853250
>Ban porn
>Muh whore simp economy
An AI database that makes ethots unemployable would solve the whore/Simp economy. Women only do this shit because they believe it will NEVER EVER EVER come back to bite them in the ass and no one will find out.

Banning porn is stupid.
>Ban porn
>Then slowly move the overton window on what is categorized as porn.
No thanks.
Porn hasn't been a problem until social media.
Videogames haven't been a problem until social media.
I think it's obvious that social media is the issue and the scape goat is muh porn and muh vidya.

>>81853566
theres something to be said about how porn can warp someones perception of reality in a negative way whether through body standards or perceptions of intimacy. none this shit addresses any of that and is just moral panic for the sake of it, and not only is it a waste of time because you'll never be able to truly police the internet but also just another scapegoat for boomers to blame about why no one wants to put up with the bullshit world theyre handing off to younger generations

Women's rights need to be abolished or humanity would literally die. Why is this controversial.

>>81853740
You can police the internet, it is already done in a ton of other circumstances: you make it prohibitively expensive to operate the business online, you force payment processors to halt their transactions, you force advertisers off the platform, you tax the shit out of their revenue, and you introduce as many roadblocks as legally possible to prevent users from ever seeing their website. You can also use unscrupulous means such as constant DDOS harassment and hacking, leaking people's details, making it too risky to even use the website if anyone does actually find it.

>>81853828
Yes.
Porn primarily hurts women.

>>81853732
>I think it's obvious that social media is the issue
It's the cause of 90% of modern social problems.

We're allowing dimwits with bad ideas to fester in echo chambers until enough of them are motivated to start democratizing reality in their favor. Confidently stupid people with bad ideas become popular enough to start changing how people see the world. It's beyond dangerous, it could sink everything we've done up until now.

>>81853566
If you even consider that a "societal problem" you're basically in the wrong site. I don't know if you realize it but controlling the internet in any way has never been an acceptable opinion here, this is no place for right-wing puritan nutjobs lol

>>81853900
Shut your faggot ass up. Ban all porn permanently and lynch all porn producers and pimps publicly.

>>81853655
on-demand porn and videogames have not been a thing forever tho? they've only been a thing for like 25 years, basically in the early 00s high-speed internet was a game changer, it was considerably more time/effort for lower quality to get porn online before then. People were still porn and video game addicts then but it was less accessible to the broad masses, and most addicts then weren't more or less raised with video games and porn

>>81853912
Kill yourself bootlicker

>>81853847
Most online pornography isn't even commercial and none of what you've described is technically feasible on a national (or even regional) level without a DPRK-style whitelist-based network. Not even China has managed to get rid of online porn. You're completely clueless.