There is no reason for a dick to be this big. It's totally pointless, it's like engorged. Feels like a misstep in evolution, it needs way too much blood to be practical

Before monogamy women selected for massive genitals which is why humans have the biggest dicks of any primate and now that monogamy is dying they'll select for them again

>>81868157
chimps are nonmonogamous and have smaller dicks and bigger balls, humans have bigger dicks because we're more monogamous.

i have a really thick penis and only fucked 2x but they bleed more than you'd think

>>81868127 (OP)
some people are size queens and that's fine. I tend to prefer them on the average to smaller sizes but I'm not one to shy away from big ones either. often it's the ego that comes attached which is ick to me but I've also met some really decent guys with slammers

>>81868127 (OP)
What's that? 8 inches, about 5.5-6 in girth?

>>81868567
I think Danny is like 9x6, he rarely gets fully hard, but his length is really that impressive
his penis is a good example of a totally sexually selected organ, it's big to the point of unpracticality (lol)

>>81868750
Doesn't look that big, but it seems he has a semi and it's already impressive. Optimal size for woah factor + praticality + desirability is probably 8x6

>>81868215
i want a big one for the ego. but i'd rather have a healthy and straight one regardless. life is cruel

>>81868835
I'm tempted to say 7x6.5 would be the optimal size since any length past 7 is redundant, but yeah one inch less would diminish that "whoa factor"
6.5" girth bcs of the current (kind of insane) standards on social media these days, whores are asking for way too much (they might be just be talking shit tho (I'm kind of autistic))

>>81868750
having a bigger dick is practical tho beacuse it makes it easier to fuck women that are 200lbs+ without trying as hard.
(hence why black grew bigger dicks b/c they have bigger women, and asians are smaller b/c they have smaller women)

>>81868835
>Doesn't look that big
It's at least 9 inches

>>81868127 (OP)
Personally I blame women more.
The way the vagina and the womb work for humans is so awful that by all means we should have gone extinct ages ago.
But you know, as long as it survives, it keeps going.

>>81869415
thing is that only accounts for length, the thing that is most exceptional in human males (when compared with other apes) is our penis girth, we have a whole lot of that, a lot more than what is actually required
women selecting for fat penises so fucking much only fuels "teeheehee"-tier trains of thought in my head... like they are actually super pleasure-oriented

>>81869639
You ever seen one of those videos of a guy getting his dick snapped in half during cowgirl...
Yeah pencil dicks, not ideal

What do you mean by ""teeheehee" tier thought trains" anon?

>>81869860
>What do you mean by ""teeheehee" tier thought trains" anon?
getting stretched up by fat cocks doesn't seem to me like something evolutionary useful. In my mind I picture early female homo sapiens like turbo size queens, like the kind you see on those reddit rage bait screencaps...

Being big is an evolutionary luxury and so is being a size queen. In a food shortage being big and burning more calories just to maintain bodily functions is a major disadvantage and so is being a size queen.

>>81868157
>>81868179
We have way bigger dicks than other primates because when male primates fight each other the first thing they do is try to tear off the opponent's genitals. Smaller genitals are a smaller target and thus safer for them.

>>81869464
>The way the vagina and the womb work for humans is so awful that by all means we should have gone extinct ages ago.
Even tho childbirth is painful people keep having sex and shitting out babies because sex is just that good.

Nobody is gonna give up sex just for the possibility of giving birth after 9 months. Also childbirth gets MUCH less painful the more you do it, which is why back then nobles were able to have like 20 kids.

>>81868127 (OP)
Gonna need some sauce on that, for science.

>>81868127 (OP)
>There is no reason for a dick to be this big
There's every reason. Look how she absolutely worships it.

>>81871003
Are you sure you're not projecting your own desires? I'm 5.5 hard and have had people worship mine like porn stars. Not everyone is into big dick

>>81871120
I think that by "worshiping it" he meant something like saying "it's the biggest one I have ever had! :0" to a man while playing with it
it's kinda dumb though, a woman can lie and talk shit like that while playing with a dicklet too (lol)

>>81871003
She looks like she's having fun with a novelty item.

>>81871252
nothing wrong with that. it's can be fun to roleplay and if it turns the partner on, especially if they feel self conscious, why not

>>81868127 (OP)
I want to suck that thing so much

>>81868127 (OP)
same reason why women have huge tits even though they don't have any practical function. human evolution has gone out of control long ago

>>81871325
then go from it. if there is anything I learned from dating apps is that there are lots single guys guys with big dicks. it just goes to show size isn't everything

>>81871252
I have a test to tell if a girl is bullshitting about me being the biggest guy she's ever been with. I don't care if she is, it's just for my own curiosity. I've told every woman I have fucked how she is the tightest or wettest or hottest girl I've been with when obviously that's not true of all of them. It feels good to say and hear that stuff in the moment.
>just over 6 inches
>that's long enough for girls to two hand (one hand on top of the other like holding a baseball bat)
>ask them to two hand me
>if they're clueless and I have to show them what I mean/how to do it they are probably telling the truth
>if they immediately know what to do and are already experts at two handed stroking they have probably been with bigger guys

>>81871387
Hold up brah. If my ex gf who claimed to be a virgin, was two handing me like a pro by default, what exactly does it mean?

>>81870710
Yikes, it looks like he's squeezing a pimple! Just be glad you're not THAT guy!

>>81868127 (OP)
This girl is gonna settle down and be a mother one day. It's gonna be brutal for future generations of boys to find gigabytes of porn of their moms in their wild days

>>81871604
Maybe she watched a lot of porn

>>81868127 (OP)
>There is no reason for a dick to be this big.
It sounds like you're jealous.

>>81869920
There is a fairly obvious evolutionary advantage: stretches the vagina out and prepares it for childbirth. It's elastic muscular tissue. The more its deformed prior to childbirth the less deformation will be required during labour.

>>81871793
Does not happen.

I still think having massive boobs would be a bigger power trip.

>>81871793
>prepares it for childbirth
this is so stupid
seriously it makes no sense

>>81871672
This already happens. It doesn't matter to the whore and the kid rarely finds out.

>>81872545
They join the military to get as far away from mommy as possible

>>81871365
there is no female equivalent for penis size. boobs is not it because those change size with weight and menstruation.
the male equivalent of boobs is bone structure.

>>81872598
actually bone structure isn't it either. nobody really cares how large a woman's breasts are. men are expected to be perfectly above average when this defies the laws of statistics.

>>81872598
I didn't say they're equivalent, I said the reason for the high size variance and high extremes is the same as for boobs. the brain has already evolved to like it so now we're stuck with sexual selection permanently favoring it even though we don't really need it for any practical reason.
>>81872605
>nobody really cares how large a woman's breasts are
this is obviously not true. what is true is that there's more acceptance towards small breasts than small dicks. I think part of the reason is because breast size is always visible but penis size isn't. so small breasts are more normalized because you can see people with small breasts everywhere you go.

It's kind of fucked up how unique cocks are in terms of being outside of someone's control. Cock size and shape cannot be safely altered with any form of medical procedure no matter how much money you have. The literal richest man in the world was unable to safely alter his dick size.
Breasts, buttocks, stomach, face, chin, nose, musculature, flexibility, whatever - you can sculpt those as you see fit. You even can get drugs now to shift your weight with minimal effort. You can pick and choose how you look and get direct paths to that without much difficulty, only persistence and in some cases money. Even height is technically something that can be altered, though it is arguably an atrocious idea given the permanent damage done to your skeleton to accomplish it.
But there simply is nothing which is a similar level of "impossible" to cocks.

>>81873861
Yup, women can use everything from make-up to push-up bra's and plastic surgery to improve their looks. Guys have basically nothing and if they do they're considered still (or more) a loser.
Even when women don't want to do any of that, most of them will get attention when they just keep in shape a bit. But they're still complaining how hard their life is.

>>81873861
The beauty industry is geared towards women and the reason is obvious. If men weren't such pathetic cucks that bought the "muh personality!!" bullshit, we would already have cock and balls enlargement procedures, the cure for balding and height enhancement with little to no side effects.

>>81868127 (OP)
If its pointless then why do women have erogenous zones where only a 9+inch penis can reach

>>81868127 (OP)
I am going to expand my dong to girths never before considered with volumes of blood that most would consider unsafe