Why are more and more women wearing these shorts outside?
Because lululemons contort their fat asses into a more round shape, like a waterballoon. He ass doesn't need it though as it is a naturally thick meaty round.
>>81874961 (OP)They want to get raped like the bitch they are
>>81874961 (OP)There's no logic. It's all stupidity.
>>81874961 (OP)I don't get why women want to dress revealing, is it because it makes them feel attractive and wanted, faunting their looks
>>81875202because its summer and we want our skin to breathe?
>>81875202Flaunting fuckin auto correct
>>81875202They like the attention it gives them. They can feel the eyes on their ass and it makes them feel desired.
>>81874961 (OP)Because in the northern hemisphere (where the majority of the world's population resides), it's currently summer and therefore shorts are an acceptable form of outerwear that serves to keep the body cooler than wearing long pants.
>>81875231This, shorts must be skintight and it's normal to see the outline of the entire vulva.
If you don't think this is true you are a puritan incel.
>>81875214Do you need your clit to breathe too? Women who wear these things look grotesque
>inb4 you cant have an opinion on womens choiceIts basic civism, you fucking stupid bitch
>>81875305IS MY CLIT OUT THO? NO THE FUCK ITS NOT
>>81875320>skintight Then the rest doesnt breathe either.
ts some stupid low tier girls dres i wouldnt fuck
>>81875328the legs breathe, we're talking abt shorts no? what do shorts reveal? legs
but its hot tho just stupid people wear it
>>81874961 (OP)I like it when girls wear revealing or skimpy outfits. They look cute and hot. And I'm sure they're happy to avoid wearing a mountain of clothes in hot weather.
>>81874961 (OP)presenting for BWC to split her in half
>>81874961 (OP)>>81875202I hate women, bros. They dress sexually provocative for selfish reasons. Attention, validation, and ego driven. They don't dress to flirt with guys, just so they can feel good and then fuck off.
IMG_1060
md5: cf62c83541f83c0d42159df8db2c1b5f
🔍
Well women have a sort of charisma buff so to speak they occasionally can be found finding useful I suppose. Maybe it feels good for reasons that could potentially be related, or maybe not.
There are individual reasons for doing specific things so asking why this is more common could be difficult to defined to a certainty. I could give more reasons that could be plausible for any of the many people wearing these bike shorts.
I'm not sure I could qualify things like why flat tops were associated as popular among korean war veterans for example. You can only speculate, and on this specific forum we're on, maybe what I'm trying to say is that this thread could be seen as a bait-brainstorm combination.
>>81875353They don't dress like that for you incel. They dress like that for themselves. They use simps like you for validation purposes.
>>81875372guys guys dont worry they dress like that for me
>>81875372I don't make comments on their outfits to their face, so it's not like I'm giving them any validation or denigrate them. It's been drilled into my head thought my life, that me making any comments on the way women look is always unwelcome, no matter the stance I express or the way I express it.
>>81875400But that's the thing. They dress provocatively, but then blame and cry about provoking people. Women are trash-tier creatures
>>81875420I like to give people the benefit of the doubt. I find myself completely dying in hot weather, so I think it isn't too unbelievable for a woman to want to have the freedom to wear less clothes in such circumstances.
>>81875445Try dressing like that as a guy. They'll call you a creep. So obviously the whole "comfort" thing is a bullshit coverup. Because they see it as sexualization first and foremost.
>>81875473I think it depends. There are scenarios where I can just be straight up shirtless as a man, like e.g. at the beach, while woman would have to cover her breasts. But I'll look like a fag if I war skin-tight clothes to the grocery store, while it's fine for a woman. It's all very relative.
dien
md5: a42ec8cbf6c59f4d6d577bd3919b577a
🔍
>>81874961 (OP)is that that one korean whose into The Merkins?