>FemceIs do not exi-

>>81890995 (OP)
>>FemceIs do not exi-
no, they don't

>>81890995 (OP)
Not sure if this keeps getting posted as bait or if they are tourists that don't know that it's fake, and she's married now anyway.

>>81891009
So why do ugly moids complain about being incels when their looksmatch is available? They're just resentful they can't date an attractive woman

>>81891009
goes to show that women are really the only ones that obsess over looks
me personally my only prerequisite for a wife is that she's white and wants kids. Preferably, not a liberal. Thats about it.

>>81891009
This is really just the common Russian phenotype.

>>81891070
>So why do ugly moids
you mean 80% of men? sure I guess

>>81891070
you're transgender, and not a biological woman. you ARE a "moid" nigga.

>>81891070
I used to simp for her but I quit when I learned the news. I have a collection.

>>81891084
how is this proving that women only care about looks? she legit made a post saying she would date anyone. nonsensical

>>81891153
>>81890995 (OP)
none of you would date her. you are all lying and i dont believe you one bit. youre just saying these things to feel better about yourselves.

>>81890995 (OP)
She has a bf but you knew that before making this thread
>>81891009
/thread

>>81891173
She literally has a boyfriend.
No man that looks like her has a chance.

>>81891367
>No man that looks like her has a chance
The brutal blackpill is that this statement holds true for like 75% of women. The male equivalent of almost every woman on earth lives a dismal existence comparatively. This is extremely visible with siblings who look alike and especially with twins where one is male and the other female. You can't help but notice the massive disparity in how they are treated throughout life and their differences in outcomes. Pic related. Probably why a lot of guys troon out is subconsciously realizing thus fact

>>81891070
>their looksmatch is available
Its not. My looks match has hundreds of options and would never even talk to me.
Hell even obese, drug addicted single moms have many options.
If youre average or just ugly as a man its over

>>81891009
Women really live on tutorial mode, even the ugly ones

>>81891414
All this proves is that the actual ratio of guys to girls on dating apps is about a hundred to one. Of course the dating apps don't tell you this, if they did no guys would pay for this bullshit. Online dating is a sausage party and always has been.

>>81891830
Its not like theres any other way to meet women. Women clearly said its creepy to talk to them when they go about their business so approaching is out.
You cant even meet them through muh shared hobbies because all of those hobby meetups are just men

>>81891830
Sure in an isolated vacuum you are logically correct. Actually it doesn't even prove that. Even with equal numbers, it could also imply simply that males are more likely to message other users. Thankfully we have plenty of real world data to draw from which in the allows us to take evidence such as the image I posted in a wider context and draw more conclusive information from. Actually there was a dating app that a guy from 4chan created and he posted on /sci/ last year offering any insight you asked on the data. For several days, you could query any data and he'd post it, visualized and everything. I was basically the only anon who replied and he showed some pretty damning numbers. I can't recall exact figures, but basically women were far, far less likely to message anyone first and even less likely to reply for long. With this in mind, and the absolute gargantuan amount of other similar experiments and existing data we can pretty safely state that the average female is far, far more desired than the average man.

Anyone who spends even a cursory amount of time researching this topic will realize the simple fact: women prefer women over men, men prefer women over men. And neither party particularly cares for men, on average. This bleeds over into every aspect of life and society, especially post feminism.

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15491274/

>>81891923
The point I'm making is that, obviously no one single data point or even dataset is going to give us the full accurate picture of how things are "in reality". However when taken in aggregate, it is so overwhelmingly clear and apparent that women/females are inherently more valued by society at large AND on a more individual interpersonal scale than men. On average. There is an absolutely massive disparity. So I'm not speaking rhetorically or just from my own anecdotes when I made that statement. I am speaking objectively proven fact when I claim that the average woman experiences a wealth of benefits over the average man in post feminism society. I'm not making any value judgments on that fact, but denying it is just willful ignorance at this point. The evidence is abundant and readily available to anyone who cares to look at it.

Leaving the realm of objectivity and more into my own personal conception of the existing state of affairs, I would say society is a pyramid with 3 levels. At the very bottom exists the vast majority of men. The middle is comprised of the majority of women. The very top, which is an exceedingly small percentage of human population, is also men. The metric here is "privilege" or "status" or "wealth". Pick any of those measures and you'll find this same structure in each case.

Have practical examples, look at any modern corporation. At the top level of that hierarchical organization you'll find majority males. Go down to middle management and you'll find it is majority female. Go further down to the lowest level of laborers and you will find once again primarily males. Now simple logic dictates that this necessarily implies the majority of women are in a higher situation than the majority of men.

>>81891830
Dating apps are a market where men are the target demographic and women are sold as the product.