ai isnt code but future ai could make life seem as flat as code

>>81895631 (OP)
Increasing the processing power and size of these models results in diminishing returns. It won't ever get to the point of being magic like that, but I bet it's possible depending on the way these models are structured. If they learn to organize models In a specific way it might be possible to break past that limit

>>81895631 (OP)
>llm in a self driving car
How are you so confident about things you clearly don't understand?

>>81896138
Do you know who Ruby is? If you did you wouldn't be asking dumb questions like that

>>81896138
autonomous driving is more on the level of a facial recognition algorithm
but GOOD driving needs to have higher order functions which llms are able to do such as chat gpt since you have to make prejudicial decisions about people for example when a ai car drives more responsively with more space when it notices a car has bright colored paint or a female driver
>>81896121
it doesnt result in diminishing returns its since we need to invent better training algorithms
the methods engineers use to build ai this year would smoke the methods used ten years ago with all the same processing power and size
the best models work on memory and were trained by compute power we have had access to for decades

>>81896205
Yeah the other guys right you don't have any idea of what you're talking about. Just shut up already you fat faggot

>>81896244
what did i confuse or are you just being hostile for no reason?????
>>81896169