Time for another comfy, autistic Wikipedia binge

>>81903638 (OP)
i love binging on wikipedia but man people really talk out of their ass there

Ah yes, reading through a cesspit of pseudointellectual liberal drivel. What a day to slowly erode your already flickering intellect.

>>81903663

ok, so what would you recommend op read instead?

>>81903682
nta but the internet archive has soo much important academical literature

Browse Conservapedia, it's funnier

>>81903682
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10386285/
Then https://www.zotero.org/groups/2466685/ketosciencedatabase/collections/8U4ALHUA

>>81903663

I am reading about history of electronics and other non political topics though, there isn't more bullshit on those things than in other sources and you can easily verify it

>>81903732
And you think HISTORY isn't a topic tainted by politics and bad actors? You're reading the wrong thing, you should be reading 1984 first.

Read Technological Slavery, it's good stuff.

>>81903790

History of electronics specifically - no, not really

>>81903790

Also any source about anything can b technically be spoiled by bad actors for some reason but it doesn't mean you shouldn't read anything

>>81903905
You are unfortunately incorrect, but I don't think you have enough potential to make it worth the time it would take to help you. I will not be returning.

Based. So many tabs and bookmarks, so little time. Just be wary of the kosher articles.