>size doesn't matter
>just eat her out and be a gentle lover
>guys with big dicks are bad at sex!
but ANYBODY can become better at sex. Alse else equal, is big or small better? It is one thing to say that you can improve your situation but their advice implies you can BEST well endowed men at sex. Are people stupid? Do they think through the advice they give. Self improvement can usually improve your life a bit and provide personal fulfillment, but the idea that self improvement gives you an advantage assumes that nobody in the world is improving but you. When everyone works hard, talent wins out.

That's all cope anyway. The evidence is irrefutable that women orgasm more from tall men and men with big dicks and even more from tall men with big dicks, and that the mental arousal from fixed male genetic traits is 99% of a woman's ability to orgasm from any kind of stimulation

>>81946537 (OP)
You forget that many men are very selfish, they will never improve as lovers.

>>81946589
What makes a man a good lover to women is unfortunately his genetic height, dick size, and facial handsomeness

>>81946564
You can't just say
>the evidence says
Then not cite the evidence. Prove your claims.

>>81946607
It's the scientific concensus

>>81946604
Well if she can't get all that, she will simply have to do with you. Won't she?

>>81946638
>It's the scientific concensus
Then it should have been easy to produce this evidence

>>81946652
It won't be a very happy relationship. And if you're just an average dude, why should she choose you over anyone other schmuck walking around? If you aren't the best you'll be abandoned for someone better. Of course they can grow tired of anyone, but the honeymoon will be better.

>>81946696
Scientific concensus is defined as anyone who demands evidence for it is a psrud crackpot science denier

>>81946652
Nope. She will get it on the side by debasing herself until a single grotesque tall handsome abusechad accepts her desire to be his turd whore and she gets pregnant by him

>>81946652
Women dont have to put up or make do with anything. This isn't the 1930s

>>81947014
i don't know why a woman would ever choose me over somebody else
>women don't choose! they just feel they love you or not. it depends on mood
then it's caprice, which is even worse. at least if there is a strategy then there is something definite i can provide. i think women only counter with their fanciful ideas because they are either lack awareness of their behaviors, envision men with shortcomings as PERFECT MEN (except for the shortcoming) in which case of course it's not the end of the world, or men with actual problems are invisible to them as in they don't even know how bad it gets.

>>81946996
true that's why you always hear the
>marriage is about TEAMWORK. love is a CHOICE not a feeling!
rhetoric from them. some of them must feel real guilt over the dissonance between what their instincts want, and the "moral" choice of a man. there must be some guilt

>>81946537 (OP)
it's not so much the size that matters, but the spectacle and status that accompanies a big dick that turns women on
what's funny is a woman's inability to get off with a small dick is usually a self-fulfilling prophecy
>see small dick
>immediately shut down the idea that sex with it could be enjoyable
>sex with it isn't enjoyable
>???
>bonus: give guys a complex about it, further exacerbating the issue for everyone
meanwhile, women are cumming from rubbing their micropenises with their fingers, just like you and me
we truly live in a society