If all men died right now, we have plenty of sperm left to hopefully still carry on the human race. However, if all women were to die right now, humanity would be doomed.

Let that sink in....

>>81953356 (OP)
If the men died how would there be sperm?

>>81953356 (OP)
Humanity is already doomed and women have either killed their kids or failed to raise the ones they let live for decades. Single motherhood was another fail.

>>81953368
Spermbanks

>>81953369
I don't think the way your mother raises you impacts men's chances with women, that's on them desu

>>81953356 (OP)
Just make a new survivor type show where 100 women fend for themselves in the wild. That would be soo misogynistic

>>81953356 (OP)
Not if we instantly extract their eggs and freeze them

If 90% of the male population died over night the remaining 10% would live like kings. We have historical precedents for this.

>>81953391
Would be fun, though luckily we have evolved far beyond our ape-ish ancesto so I don't really see the practical use for it

>>81953368
They have banks with it. But it doesn't matter if you can technically have kids when you fail at raising them even when relying heavily on help from others including men in much better conditions. If you got rid of half the population doing maintenance jobs women either physically couldn't or chose not to care about you would have to work much harder than women have complained about working so far to compensate. It's already considered bad enough right now that women use it as justification for not having kids. They might just have postpartum depression on steroids and kill the kids born anyway.

>>81953400
How would you even organize that? You don't get any warning, suddenly every woman on the planet is dead

>>81953383
If how you're raised didn't impact your relationships then kids who were abused wouldn't struggle to have healthy relationships. If you're talking about chances with women in terms of technically getting your dick wet then yeah you can basically always do that.

>>81953403
Yeah but if 100% of the male population died most world issues would be fixed, and future men could be raised in women's image

>>81953435
I basically mean that, even if your mother was abusive I don't think that would impede your ability to hook up, besides severe cases I guess

>>81953438
Not when you have pms and women lining up by the hundreds and thousands to fuck guys like wade wilson who kill them for nothing. The synchronized periods and withdrawals from abuse chad would be too much to handle.

>>81953356 (OP)
>If all men died right now, we have plenty of sperm left to hopefully still carry on the human race.
You know that stuff goes bad if the power dies, don't you? Guess who's 99% of power station operators?

>>81953452
Just technically hooking up hasn't done much good for humanity so I don't see why it matters.

>>81953465
We're not animals you know, I'm pretty sure we're capable enough to maintain the basics of society

>>81953469
I thought the anon was blaming mothers for a lot of men failing in life, but reading it again now he probably meant to say mothers failed women, which is false anyways unless talking about a case by case basis

>>81953514
Mothers or single mothers specifically failed the men and women they raised because the men and women they raised weren't protected well and didn't turn out in good condition mentally or physically. Much more likely to fail at school do drugs to cope and be suicidal. They're directly responsible for the outcomes of the kids they were allowed to raise by themselves. Especially when they bragged about not needing men or did a series of bad choices leading up to breeding with the wrong men. And the fact they often bring dangerous men around their children because they're more worried about getting off, they'll do these things single or with kids.

the all-women world is incapable of opening jam jars and will go insane overnight

>>81953514
>We're not animals
You're not a real woman and far beneath a wild animal. But real women already complain that the work they do is too much while still relying on men and many more comforts. Women already fail at maintaining the basics of society in much better conditions. They can't take care of themselves or their kids. They eat, drink or drug themselves to death by the millions. They can't handle basic criticism or truth. But you a failure tranny think they would be perfectly fine if they lost massive amounts of support because your sad fantasies said so. Just end it already.

>>81953373
This fucking retard doesnt know how shit works. But shes a woman, what more can you expect.

This thread will get plenty of attention so I'm just casually dropping your daily reminder that if you're man all females are your biological enemies.

>>81953373
Ok, all the spermbanks are destroyed in the process.
What now?

>>81953514
>We're not animals you know
Could have fooled me

>>81953559
I mean some single mothers do a poor job sure, but do you think every woman is incapable of raising a child? If your father died when you were young, do you really see your mother as so incapable she would've failed you and you would've turned into some crazy drug addict?
>>81953593
Am I trans or a dumb foid, or perhaps both, eternally in superposition

>>81953641
What're you even talking about

>>81953666
That's a lotta words, too bad I ain't reading em

>>81953666
Women are just one of multiple tools for the actual enemy. They've always switched sides or been easily manipulated. You can be cautious around women and not sacrifice as expected but it shouldn't be forgotten there's something much worse than them steering them and shaping them physically and mentally.

>>81953724
>That's a lotta words, too bad I ain't reading em
It's not meant for you.
>>81953749
>steering them and shaping
delusional, nurture means nothing, it's all nature

>>81953706
Mfw the organ that produces sexual stimulation upon touch produces sexual stimulation upon touch. Can you control your moid stick from getting hard at a lust provoking image?

>>81953724
If single mothers raised kids fine they wouldn't have much worse outcomes for kids. It's not just a few cases of this, if anything it's just a very few cases of women dealing with the father dying yet you bring it up as some defense. Even if the father died and the women had less responsibility for things going south the kids would still be worse off without the support and protection of a father.

>>81953766
Trve all women are naturally evil I can attest to this as an evil female who is evil and hates all men because I'm evil, not because they smell bad

>>81953766
Nurture or what you expose people to shapes their nature or genes. They've been doing this for years. They create bad genes then reinforce those genes with more chemicals and grooming.

>>81953778
>Can you control your moid stick from getting hard at a lust provoking image?
Better than foids can control their base urges.

>>81953724
>Am I trans or a dumb foid, or perhaps both, eternally in superposition
The simp's dilemma, hard to tell whether it's a silly woman who should be protected from herself or a troon lookin to cause trouble. In any event, women must never be blamed for such things and most certainly never be correctly identified as an enemy. That's a horrible thought it makes my tummy hurt.
>>81953819
>they smell bad
They probably do from your perspective, I mean your entire genome is built to antagonize them. At this point I honestly believe that women perceive men the same way people perceive indians.

>>81953801
Yes of course the absence of a father figure will have some kind of impact, but to think you would've never turned out as a full human being without a father despite the mother doing her best says a lot how you think about your own mother anon. Shame on you, I hope she's doing well

>>81953864
>but to think you would've never turned out as a full human being
When kids of single mothers are much more likely to fail at school, do drugs to cope and be suicidal its safe to say they weren't raised to meet their full potential. Unless your definition of "full human" involves falling at life.

>>81953356 (OP)
Sure, youre not wrong. But many of you would be back to foraging and living in mudhuts since its mostly males who maintain our modern day infrastructure. Think you can handle that?

>>81953830
I must quote this random paper without actually understanding how publishing of scientific research works, or even reading deeper into the text to understand what it's saying because the words in the abstract agree with me

>>81953842
Obviously not all women are like this, but I'm unironically misandrist and pretty much the girl in picrel

>>81953922
>I must quote this random paper without actually understanding how publishing of scientific research works, or even reading deeper into the text to understand what it's saying because the words in the abstract agree with me
You right now:

>>81953907
They would also end up badly mimicking the worst men like they've done for years to cope with those men being gone. Also OP is obviously a tranny.

>>81953896
Yes, but that's obviously because the single mother did a poor job at raising the child due to a multitude of factors. That doesn't mean all single mothers would raise their child poorly, unless again, you would agree that your own mother being in a situation that she was forced to raise you by herself would royally fuck her life up. Instead of looking into why these mothers do a poor job, you just go "oh well single mothers obviously can't raise their children, they need a man"

>>81953958
They raised them poorly because they couldn't back up the girl power propaganda and actually need support in general and for a child especially. If it's common for single mothers to fail at raising their kids already then in a scenario where they have to work even harder to compensate for no more men they would do even worse. The why of them being single mothers doesn't change the fact they're giving their kid much less than they need for being a "full human".

>>81953907
>Millenia of developments of math, science, infrastructure and everything else will crumble away like dust the second men disappear and society will regress back to the stone age
Yes absolutely sir I'm sorry my dumb foid brain didn't think of that

>>81953941
What is with the trans obsession I don't understand

>>81953941
As much as OP talks about raising the next generation of men in women's images, we already have multiple precedents for that, and fatherless men are generally unpopular among women unless they end up resorting to hypermasculine bravado.

>>81953990
You tell us why you're obsessed with larping as the opposite sex online. Its your choice.

>>81953988
I understand how you feel anon, but you are ignoring a very important question I've asked in the previous comments. Once again, in the circumstances that your mother would've had to raise you by yourself, do you or do you not believe she would've been able to do a sufficient enough job for you to integrate into society and for you to become a relatively okay person?

>>81953825
>Nurture or what you expose people to shapes their nature or genes.
Epigenetic mutations do not become a part of your genome unless you're exposed to the same pressures over a very long time period. Women hate you because it's just their nature, you will never be able to find a combination of words to make them feel any other way.
You can cope and immerse yourself in the bible or any other fantasy, but it's always going to be there, women will always think of you as their enemy. It's just an unfortunate state mammals and many other animals exist in, it can't be helped.
>>81953922
>not all women are like this
They are all like this, some of them just don't express it in plainly apparent ways. The patterns of compulsive partner disposal are universal, obviously they're not going to straight up admit all of this, it wouldn't benefit them.

>>81954003
Well I'm not, what makes you think I'm trans though?

>>81954025
>do you not believe she would've been able to do a sufficient enough job for you to integrate into society and for you to become a relatively okay person
"Sufficient enough" and "relatively" aren't getting you a full human who got all they needed. Integrating into an obviously openly sick and unhealthy society is not being a full human. You're asking some pretty stupid questions.

>>81953990
>>Millenia of developments of math, science, infrastructure and everything else will crumble away like dust the second men disappear and society will regress back to the stone age
Yeah we have no instances of societal collapses whatsoever.
Oh wait, we do.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Societal_collapse

>>81954041
I'm not even arguing women will stop being hostile I'm just pointing out that your experiences in life shape your genes and the worst genes have been reinforced for years. It's 99 percent part of why women are so seemingly naturally hostile to men. They're thoroughly trained flesh tools for much more powerful creatures who hate you.

>>81954057
I'm saying "sufficient enough" and "relative" because a perfect upbringing is quite frankly impossible in most cases, but I'll world it differently. Under solely your mother's care of her raising you from childhood to adulthood, would you be a "full human being" in your words, and everything that that constitutes, yes or no?

>>81954095
You don't need perfect and the real issue is basic things like protection or stability or connection with half of what made them into existence are denied. You don't need perfect for that. If you're talking about full humans but this doesn't involve humans who got all their basic needs for functioning well met then it's a meaningless term. It's not like we're talking about other species. Kids of single mothers are measurably much worse off because they're clearly lacking in ways that were avoidable. I don't know why you're so desperate to argue depressed worse off humans are full humans.

>>81954064
>Lol linking the wiki page to collapse
At least say something more substantial or bring up the sea people and the bronze age collapse, that's actually interesting and pertains to the topic. But for women to forget how to read and write and science to become lost forever, society has to collapse first, which means society will collapse after all men die off. Whilst certainly not unfeasible, since half the world population dying is a big shift, this would mean every major and minor political organization, the entire structure of government and the law and justice system, every contingency measure, every scientific organization and or institute, and more etc I'm not typing all this out on second thought, not being able to cohesively come together and formulate a plan going forward, which I really don't think men are so special in. Yes it's a hypothetical scenario that'll never happen and it's silly to think about it in so much der, but I think women will be fine

>>81954137
I would like to argue with you in good faith, but you are very purposefully avoiding a very important question I'd like to know the answer to to further my debate, but you won't answer. Not much use continuing a debate if you just perpetually choose to skirt around certain things

>>81954095
>>81954137
When children of single mothers are lacking in what's needed for a good life it's contradictory to say they're fully who they were meant to be. If the mothers were enough by themselves they would do everything by themselves and get much better results. You're arguing for something that doesn't make sense. And bringing up perfection as unrealistic is really just a sad and weak excuse for avoidable bad behavior.

>>81954196
Your question was already answered in detail. You can't have a full human or one that reached their potential or what they were supposed to be in a lacking environment which single mothers offer. You're just really stupid

>>81954087
>I'm not even arguing women will stop being hostile
That's good, because they won't.
>I'm just pointing out that your experiences in life shape your genes
and I'm saying that they don't, not in the way you think anyway. Lamarckism is largely discredited(although not completely). It's a much longer process than raising a good kid and expecting their offspring to inherit the same traits, it just doesn't work that way.
>worst genes have been reinforced for years
That, I can not argue with. You're right. Women had little to no selection pressure and none of the overt displays of their traits interfered with their reproductive success in the past and therefore the amounts of matrilineal genetic detriment they're harboring is incomprehensible.
Perhaps instead of entertaining fantasies of saving women from the powers that be, people should start appreciating feminism for performing the first ever selective mass culling of females, which will help a lot with mental illnesses and balding, but don't ever expect the underlying hostility to go away because it goes much deeper than a mental disorder.

>doesn't realize there is actual ways for them to take genetic material from two females now to make offspring
>artificial wombs are still being researched but are viable
Though to your benefit, they can do the same exact methods for men as well.

>>81954196
You weren't even debating just refusing to accept basic reality

>>81954229
It's not just about saving women from the powers that be but recognizing they train the women to be what you're complaining about here. Even if they're bad without the training you can't argue they don't make it much worse. They also cause mental illness and things like baldness without bad genes because they're allowed to have power over or teach children the wrong things and poison the population through food/water/air etc.

>>81954229
The answer to all of these questions is that men fucking suck lmao, it's not that hard or deep. As for the gene science, life experiences do genuinely shape your genes and will shape the genes of your offspring. It has been widely proven that women with anxiety disorders will give those disorders to their children through epigenetic editing. Lamarckism has been disproven in the past but has been making a steady comeback in the scientific community for the past 50 years or so, see the Dutch winter of starvation offspring or the experiments on men with diabetes. None of this really is important, I'm just putting this out there because you shouldn't talk out of your ass. As for there being no selection pressure; you are simply delusional. Women have been conditioned to be subservient to men for most of history, female infanticide in China was widely accepted, women with undesirable characteristics wouldn't get married off, etc. There is no grand scientific truth to why feminism is so widespread these days. The truth is just that moods suck, plain and simple

>>81954167
>At least say something more substantial or bring up the sea people and the bronze age collapse
I was going to mention that, but the article suffices for a stupid imageboard discussion.
And yes, it doesn't have anything to do with a inherently special trait among men, at least by itself. It has absolutely everything to do with men making up most of the essential fields, however. The collapse would be catastrophic because the scale of such a demographic/societal decline would be unprecedented.
In any case, men form the backbone of the workforce in virtually every population and you'd be hard pressed to persuade women into taking up most of the physically stressing and inconvenient tasks.
>Yes it's a hypothetical scenario that'll never happen and it's silly to think about it in so much der, but I think women will be fine
Wishful thinking.

>>81954331
Why bitch about female infanticide or female killing in general when free women have now and in the past killed their kids or rewarded men who kill women among others? Also use muh conditioning to be subservient as an excuse for women being pathetic or malicious headcases as if men throughout history haven't also always answered to some type of minority of royalty or religious figures. Yet I don't see you justifying all they do wrong because muh conditioning. Because you're stupid and coping plain and simple. You're also one of the "moods" who suck. Sorry you had to find out like this.

>>81954402
>All "rational" and "scientific" instantly is overtaken by seething once you call out obvious retarded pseudo science
The moid cries out in pain as he strikes you

>>81954331
>There is no grand scientific truth to why feminism is so widespread these days. The truth is just that moods suck, plain and simple
Feminism in practice is women copying the worst of men while failing at it but they still complain about men from the distant past hurting their pussy. Feminism isn't some righteous reaction to women being wronged by le men it's another psyop from men in power to add on to the dumb bitches suffering for more power and control. That the women genuinely believe they're winning against or mainly spiting abusive men because of it just makes it easier to maintain and spread like the women's legs and stds.

>>81954297
Sure, take away their power, that is the reasonable next step, but as always, you will fail to contain them because you're not built for it, you have no real mechanism to actually recognize them as the adversaries that they are.
You literally can not perceive them the same way they perceive you, you will always think of them as your people, but they will never think of you that way.
>>81954331
>Women have been conditioned to be subservient to men for most of history
Conditioned, not selected for or against, none of their detrimental traits interfered with reproductive success.
No social conditioning or social constructs can ever hope to compete with the underlying mammalian hatred of the male which is an ever-present pressure on the evolutionary timeline. It's not unique to human beings, either.
>female infanticide in China was widely accepted
that's not a selection pressure, that's indiscriminate genocide out of greed, parents didn't abort daughters because they had a preference for sons, they have aborted them because they wanted a better return on their investment for their old age.

>>81954064
>knowledge
doesnt help if you cant maintain society

>>81954492
oops replied to the wrong one meant to reply to the foid you quote

>>81954431
You're not even responding to the same person and you can never explain why what you just responded to was irrational. Crying out in pain as you strike you is all feminism has been, only they strike themselves as well as men who didn't actually harm them. Many more women kill themselves with alcohol alone never mind eating than men kill them, that's a fact you can confirm in a few seconds. But muh abusive men right? Dial 8 you dumb ugly faggot.

>>81953356 (OP)
I don't really care about whatever propaganda this post is supposed to be. Humanity would be better off with both genders alive lol.

>>81954471
You could contain them with discipline, punishing bad behavior and training them right. If you treated them as adversaries like you say you would just kill them and die out. You can't live with what's just an enemy.

>>81954471
>Mammalian hatred of the male
Enlighten me on this concept, because as far as I know in almost every society women were seen as lower beings than men due to being physically weaker and easily dominated. The pagans, Greeks, romans, indians, Chinese, even abrahamic societies to an extent, especially Muslim societies, the Mongols, you get the point

>>81954540
It's a fun thought exercise, also I hate the moids here and thought it was fun to rile them up

>>81954578
Self hatred is common in trannies who can't even pass slightly, go post in your designated board >>>/lgbt/ or find a nice subreddit.

>>81954549
>You could contain them with discipline, punishing bad behavior and training them right.
How did that work so far? You can train them any way you like but two words from another another woman to give them a nudge the other way and all of your work is obliterated. Pathos > logos, you can't do a fucking thing about it. If they hate you and you train them to behave, they will still hate you and will act on it as soon as they are able.

>>81954563
You're referring to another interpretation of the word patriarchy, which is the flimsy containment system that I've described. It doesn't last, it's a temporary social construct that men create to maintain their societies, but they can't actually comprehend that their so-called other half perceives their societies as an extension of them, something that they feel compelled to destroy, because it's foreign, not female.

All the countries you've listed are coming apart and social cohesion and birth rates are plummeting since women wriggled their way out of containment, except for mongolia and a few select muslim countries. Even Indian birth rates are plummeting, hell even the often cited Israeli birth rates are going down, despite still being above average in the list of semi-civilized societies.
>Enlighten me on this concept
read the long screencap, I think I covered most of it. You can't play oppression olympics with me because I wipe my ass with your accusations.

>>81954714
>How did that work so far?
Infinitely better than what happened the past century. Are you saying humans should just die out?

>>81954578
I don't see the point in pissing people off I guess. Just makes their crazy views more tight and hateful. Vengeful tactics never work to stop hate. Its kinda exhausting to watch it happen lol.

Its all just so stupid, the planet in general sometimes. I don't like people very much.

>>81954766
There is no point but lesser creatures do what lesser creatures do until they finish killing themselves

>>81954825
Guess I wouldn't care if it didn't involve me, but it does. I'm part of groups that get hate, everyone is.

>>81954733
>Are you saying humans should just die out?
I'm not entirely sure, but I often get those kinds of feelings.
One thing is for certain, a society of cohabiting males and females will never last, it's never going to be a thing, it's going to be an endless cycle of these weak ass patriarchal revivals, a few "good years" and then decay and hostility again.

A female will never be biologically capable of perceiving a male as a part of their in-group.

>>81954766
>I don't like people very much.
Very valid takes, I don't really either. You're right about it being dangerous and confirming people's hateful beliefs, but that would've been an issue if we were talking about people irl. The people on this board are practically quarantined from society and will never actually influence anyone that matters, so you can say and do whatever you want. Of course I don't always do this, it does get tiring after a while

>>81954853
>I can come and go from here as I please but not anyone else on the board
Extreme narcissism and stupidity from a lesser creature

>>81954853
>but that would've been an issue if we were talking about people irl. The people on this board are practically quarantined from society and will never actually influence anyone that matters, so you can say and do whatever you want.
Kind of a bad take. There are plenty people on here that have lives outside of 4chan, even if they didn't they'd still spread their hateful views around to others, and thats the problem, it spreads and gets into peoples heads. It absolutely does influence many things.

>>81953356 (OP)
>women only society
>collapses in 3 years because they can't get anything done without acting like whores

if all men died women would kill each other off within a generation

>>81954875
I mean I can and I do if I feel up to it. Since when has bait been a solely female thing? And if I were a guy looking to rile up the lesser femoids, wouldn't you have agreed with me? It's kind of a consequence of using primarily 4chan as a means of communication and taking it too seriously, you get your thoughts warped by people who are either insane, are not serious, or a bit of both. I'm not the most sane person either since misandry is not really accepted in society (regardless of how you look at it), but if you really want to take power back from these "lesser female creatures" maybe you should log off a bit? It cannot be healthy being this preoccupied 24/7

>>81954963
>And if I were a guy looking to rile up the lesser femoids
Every thread trying to get the attention of a "femanon" is pathetic. You're not the only one coming to this shithole and youre a lesser creature because you behave like this not because you pretend to have a pussy online.

>>81954894
Mhm I can see where you're coming from tbdesu. Personally I'd say that if you've ended up at this point, the person may be unsalvageable and not much will help them change their hate, but it's not like my misandry posting is bettering anything. I might misandry post less in the future. I do really think it's a drop in the mud though, so many people have radicalized or themselves or been radicalized through some kind of neo nazi industrial complex, it feels like whatever you do doesn't really do much in the face of it

>>81954999
I have no idea what you're trying to say sorry

>>81955026
Be the change you want to see, they say.
Even if I'm a grain of sand in the desert, the least I can do is respect myself and not contribute to it, even if the only person it helps the most is me.

>>81954766
That's mighty white of you, concerned citizen. Did you communicate that same feedback to misandrist women when they didn't yet have an emerging opposition, or is it something that started bothering you recently?

>>81955209
Not entirely sure what you mean, I think everybody should stop giving into their assumptions and vengeful urges

>>81955234
>Not entirely sure what you mean
You don't, huh?

>>81955242
Don't explain it then I guess, if you want to keep believing I'm proving some mysterious point of yours.

>>81955267
There's no mysterious point, there's only duplicity and hypocrisy from people who came out of the woodworks with their concerns, just as soon as radical feminists(honest women) started encountering their male counterparts, but not one moment before.

>>81955319
I still don't know what you're talking about, are you trying to say that I only care when its one way and not the other or something? Cause I already said that I think both sides are dumb if they're vengeful.

>>81955428
>are you trying to say that I only care when its one way and not the other
Yes.

>>81955437
Well then, in that case, like I said..
both equally dumb.
male rape should be treated as seriously as female rape.. female workers should be treated as seriously as male workers.. etc etc.. whatever. Equal, stuff like that.

>>81953415
Women can sustain themselves. They historically did that all the time as men left for war - for 2 5 10 25 years(in R. Empire thats literally how long draft lasted). If all men died they would have lots of leftover vacant houses, and everything else is actually just easy if you do it for just yourself. And remember that women also consume half as much calories than men, are more effective at surviving famine and that being pregnant significantly boosts their immunity. Women are also more likely to quickly collectivize due to their strong same sex bias. Girls that dont belong to some clique basically dont exist, while loner men are common.
>They might just have postpartum depression on steroids and kill the kids born anyway.
Some certainly will but that is not significant enough numbers to make humanity extinct. Not everyone needs to have children and outside of modern capitalism perpetual growth of population is strictly negative strain on resources.

>>81953666
Which is the parasitic alyenoid on your pic trying to portray his perverted subversion of nature as a good thing? If you dont like how nature is constructed just kill yourself or fuck off to other planet, leave those that want to live according to the God' blueprints as intended alone. This world is not for you, you came here just to be angry and stomp on others, thats fucking evil. It is really fascinating how fucking moids are the only male animal who, when they came atop food chain just fucking proceeded to turn this world into hell, destroy multiple ecosystems and then feel proud about it. No other animal does such retarded things even when they express cruelty. Why are you all proud of being a literal virus? You are abhorrent and disgusting. A mimicry of a mammal controlled by spermatazoic prion

>>81954340
>you'd be hard pressed to persuade women into taking up most of the physically stressing and inconvenient tasks.
You dont need to persuade anyone into doing things necessary for their own survival, however even if you needed to, women are way more malleable and agreaable, and it is way more easier in practice to make them work male jobs than to make men work female jobs. Women have worked in factories, have worked in mines, in quarries, as truck drivers and so on. Sometimes out of social need in the lack men, but sometimes also for their own good when it was the only option to raise money for their families.
But men working as maids, prozzies, nannies, spinsters? Lol that never happened. Even in the modern day men in such professions make up literally 1 in a 500 000. But women at factories are very common in third and second world, and happen at around 1 in a 500 rate in developed world.

>>81954714
Birthrates go down with urbanisation not femism you doof. City is an unnatural enviroment for a human to live so it naturally suppresses human's desire to reproduce due to constant stress induced inflammation.
You can't seriously be implying retarded shit like "Indias br is plummeting because they are so feminist!". This is just fucking retarded. There have been no movements on feminism in India in the past 50 years, not a single step. Meanwhile Mongolia is literally still 80% rural, they don't even have very strict patriarchy because they live in small villages and every hand counts there. At some point more women in mongolia were officially employed than men and juridically they have all equal rights.
Send people back to farms digging dirt and they will start like rabbits

>>81955995
Feminism is a buzzword, it doesn't mean anything, it's just a frame in which their hatred is presented. Do you think those bearded hags at seneca falls gave a single dip of shit about women's rights or votes?
Their ideology is just female nature in written form and it's nothing more than a standpoint against anything male. It's completely natural, it's not meddling, not a jewish campaign, it's just how they are.

Bumping this back straight to page 1 where it belongs. I'm not going to let OP down.

>>81953356 (OP)
Don't care, 20 years from now we'll have DNA and genetic modification and lab grown babies and shit and there will be an abundance of genetically perfect girls that I can love.

>>81957113
Do you know how close we are to a civilization ending solar flare? Be realistic here the magnetic field is weakening because we are in a geomagnetic excursion.

>>81957148
I highly doubt that, maybe in 100 years.

>>81953356 (OP)
this is such a braindead take but i'll humour you.
no. women wouldnt. apart from society collapsing without men to maintain everything, the amount of dead bodies piling up will not only traumatise women, but be a giant biohazard. This is something no one ever brings up in a zombie apocyplses. Regardless of whether or not you survive, humanity does not have enough resources to clean up all that biomass before disease sets in.

btw, there's enough sperm in those banks to repopulate, and even if it did, it'll just result in more men being born so you'll be right back where you started, unless you think only women will be born. If that's the case then the species will be dead by the next generation

>>81953356 (OP)
You can just make new foids from stem cells

I love how so many women seriously believe they would join hands in world peace singing kumbaya together if all men were to be wiped out. We have evil oppressors because power corrupts, it has little to do with how any one group feels about the other.
Purge men and the baddest, bitchiest bulldykes are free to establish their new world order. Not even modern women deserve a fate so cruel.

bumping OP's cool thread back to page 1

preserving this high-quality thread for OP

>>81953373
power would go out, sperm goes bad. women would be screwed harder than men

>>81961018
Some would probably be currently pregnant.

>necrobumping this many times
I wonder how many of these posts are samefags.

>>81958220
i love cossacks so much i wish i could larp as one but im a blackie

>>81961047
I only bumped when I said I bumped, that's not samefagging.

>>81961849
>>81961047
bumping deez nutz on both of your foreheads

>>81955631
What war had every single man leaving like the scenario for this thread? We would be extinct. They're talking about using sperm banks to get pregnant in the middle of the worst disaster they've ever faced lmao. Women stop working over less when pregnant. They wouldn't even be able to handle all the rotting bodies like someone else pointed out much less have kids and raise them well. I'll believe most women could sustain themselves plus kids when they actually do it and stop relying on men.

>>81962452
Note how these arguments always highlight how women need men but never even imply that they desire them. Pretty brutal.

>>81953356 (OP)
Yoshitaka Amano reference this thread is amazing

>>81953438
>and future men could be raised in women's image
so they'd all be retarded?

>>81953356 (OP)
Thats not even slightly true retard. God can create new humans at his whim. He is much more powerful than it looks. Hes eating a sandwich behind me lol. Actually hes everyone in that restaurant. Hes said basically that its better to watch him eat a sandwich, than to have one for yourself. So thats what we do here is we watch god eat and have sex. And, the knowledge keeps us safe. Because hes not doing this for no reason. Its probably pretty good to not have a sandwich and to watch god eat one and then cum in a cute girls butt. He does that every day. He is an incredible god dude I clap and give him a standing ovation every day, honestly I mean that. To produce human clones and then eat and have sex with them in my presence was no short of a miracle. Thats genius.

>>81953356 (OP)
eggs in clinics. artificial wombs. deregulating cloning and other cutting edge science. we'd be fine too

now ask yourself which gender can actually pull off the eradication and let THAT sink in

>>81964211
>let that SINK in
alright