Personally, I don't really buy into this whole race thing for a number of reasons, but I find the way it was organized very interesting, it's almost like fantasy races (which they obviously inspired). To start with, there's three major racial classifications with each having three seperate subcategories.

>Negroid: Congoid, Australoid, and Capoid
As you can probably tell by the name, this is the racial group which contains (almost) all peoples possessing black skin. Other distinguishing features include extremely curly hair, longer heads, yellower eyes, flatter noses, and larger teeth. They are commonly stereotyped as the most masculine of the three races, being more athletically adept, but less intellectually capable than the other two. Of the Negroid race the three subgroups are the Congoids in Subsaharan Africa and The Carribbean (Bantus, Nilotes, and Pygmies), the Australoids in Southern India, Oceania, and Southeastern Asia (Dravidians, Australasians, and Negritos), and the Capoids in Southwestern Africa (Khoikhoi and San). By far the most populous of these groups are the Congoids, with the Australoids trailing behind as the (mostly mixed) Dravidians make up the bulk of their population, and the Capoids coming in dead last with only a few thousand of them remaining. Generally speaking Congoids are the darkest of the groups and have a propensity towards balding, while the Australoids are slightly lighter and have far more hair than the other two, whereas the Capoids have far fairer skin than the other two while possessing thinner hair which they usually retain in some form or another throughout their lives.


(1/4)

>Caucasoid: Aryan, Semitic, and Hamitic

All peoples generally considered "caucasian" would fall into this group. Caucasoid distinguising features are pointed noses, hair that can be either straight or curly, high levels of body hair, smaller mouths, and a universal propensity towards balding. Often stereotyped as the middlepoint between masculinity and femininity, being capable of strength and independance while also being intelligent and beautiful. In terms of subraces there are the Aryans of Europe, North America, and West Asia (Europeans, Iranics, Indo-Aryans), the Semites of the Middle East and North Africa (Arabs, Jews, and Assyrians), and the Hamites of Northern and Eastern Africa (Berbers, Habeshas, and Cushitics). Far and away the Aryans are the most populous of these groups being found in some of the most populated areas of the planet, after that comes the Semites with a comfortable population in MENA, and in last would be the Hamites which are only found in great numbers in the Horn of Africa. As for their differences (pure) Aryans are known to have straight hair along with multicolored hair and eyes, Semites are known to have a great deal of bodyhair and hooked noses, and Hamites possess dark skin and curlier hair.
(2/4)

>Mongoloid: Asiatic, Austronesian, and Americanoid
People in this group are connected more loosely than the other two, but are still generally considered one race (or at least used to be, all this stuff is bunk nowadays anyway). Despite that, they do still share many common features like straight black hair, little to no body or facial hair, slanted eyes, yellow or reddish tinted skin, and neotenous facial features. By and large mongoloids are considered the most feminine of the three races, being prone to huddling together in large populations and being very intelligent, although they are most certainly the weakest physically. When it comes to their subraces it is very broad and includes the Asiatics of mainland Southeast Asia, East Asia, Central Asia, and Subarctic Siberia (Altaics, Sino-Tibetans, Indochinese), the Austronesians of Taiwan, Oceania, the Islands of Southeast Asia, and Madagascar (Formosans, Malayo-Polynesians), and the Americanoids of the Arctic Circle and Americas (Eskimos, Samoyedics, Amerindians). Once again a clear winner in terms of population is present in the Asiatics and their stranglehold over some of the most populous countries on the planet, after that we have the Austronesians which are heavily populated (mostly in Indonesia), and finally we have the Americanoids which exist mostly in small tribes in harsh environments or as mixed race Latin Americans. Asiatics can be distinguished by their yellower skin and more neotenous features, while Austronesians are capable of having multicolored hair and generally have brown skin, finally there's Americanoids which possess reddish skin and are completely incapable of growing any facial or body hair except in the rarest of circumstances.


(3/4)

>>81966361 (OP)
If you're into paleoanthropology they have a different model now based on early human development mostly homo erectus to homo sapiens and neatherthals and deniosovans whiteoids have neatherthal admixture for example and they we're well known to be somewhat strange and antisocial compared to homo sapiens who breeded them out asians are mostly pure homo sapiens less creative but hyper social and intelligent all their tools looked the same also some have denisovan mixture and also epigenetics is involved idk shit is complicated but we have a better model now bro that shit is from the early 1900s XD

As for why I don't really believe in race as a concept, it just seems kinda biased? I mean why is the Hamitic race a thing other than to strip blacks of any so-called "accomplishments?" Not to mention that the continent of Africa is more diverse than every other place on earth combined, a bantu is more closely related to an amerindian than he is to a khoisan. A lot of it is just made of speculation and wastebin taxons used to dump random things wherever since they don't fit anywhere else, like I'm pretty sure Australoids aren't even closely related to each other between negritos dravidians and papuans/aboriginal australians. All this to say >>81966384
It is indeed a cool concept, but not one I take with any actual importance.

>>81966414
Only Arabs can be happy.

>>81966516
Inshallah habibi