It's your fault. Lower your standards, incels.

>>81970754 (OP)
i have never installed a dating app

Femcels don't even use dating apps, it's always the stacies who are looking a quick fuck.

dating apps only work for chad so it's not my fault

>>81970754 (OP)
i don't use dating apps. i'm not posting face, personal info, and debasing myself with a cutesy bio for a chance at pussy.

>>81970754 (OP)
Even at my physical best when I was like 21 I had no standards, swiped yes on 99% of women across multiple dating apps and never got matches, I won't be humiliating myself again

>>81970754 (OP)
as a 3/10 autistic femcel i agree with this i was on dating apps and have never been able to get a date because im too ugly

>>81970754 (OP)
>obscure Czech dating app
Not one part of this study was done with any kind of rigor

>>81970829
Would you date a 3/10 autistic incel?

>>81970754 (OP)
Legitimately a lot of hag Millennials and roastie Zoomer women are going to start chimping out over the next 10 years as it becomes undeniable that they are getting nobody in the end. Right now a lot of them are still living on copium.

>>81970754 (OP)
>studies show, goy
meanwhile

>>81970754 (OP)
who the hell makes all these *studies*, dont they better things to spent their time researching

At least the top comments are ripping that post apart.

>>81970754 (OP)
Even if you are a 20-year-old, athletic young man, 40-year-old single moms are still going to reject you for not having enough money and not being mature enough.
JUST GIVE ME THE MOMMY MILKERS, YOU FILTHY HAGS!

>>81970863
This would require the average woman to actually think and not live entirely based on tingles.

>>81970754 (OP)
dating? They surely jest and mean fwb right?

>>81970754 (OP)
I met a 325 pound 10/10 Stacy on a dating app once and dated her for 1.25 years. I never really got over that one, it is an unreachable time in my life and now I am GGed.

>>81970754 (OP)
The first time I saw this edited chart was today. I think it's pretty accurate.

>>81970957
If a girl is 325 pounds and 5 foot 8 what is the highest number she could be on this chart?

>>81970754 (OP)
Ok, ill take the jewish bait. Ive dated the absolute bottom of the barrel, im talking women that couldnt type a sentence without making 30 different typos, druggies, mentally ill women, freeloaders, overly dramatic and abusive bitches, women who didnt finish highschool, deformed women, handcapped women and those women were fucking unbareable. I dated them because i thought those were the people on my level as a fat unhygienic ungroomed unemployed druggie. Now im looksmaxxed, gymmaxxed, moneymaxxed and mental healthmaxxed and i wont conform with those women, nor with a fat fuck, nor with an unemployed one, nor with a bitch with princess complex, nor with an uggo, nor with a instathot who has posted every single gooner bait possible with 20000 guys in her dms. Ive been told the most absolute retarded shit, ranging from "fitness=misogynic" to "marriage is slavery". Im not asking for your typical unreal bullshit like "i want a tradwife whos a virgin and never touches herself", i would settle for a woman that can keep 5 mins of conversation without pulling her phone type of shit, you know, what people who is seminormal does. But thats fucking impossible, i swipe yes on everything because selecting women is retarded because they are all the same fucking hivemind with different tits and asses, but oh man... i just came back here from my daily swipes and even if you explicitly filter by "stable relationship" tinder fills the void and 90% of them has "relationship but open to casual", meaning they are looking for a fuck and a betabuxxer at the same time. You cant make this shit up. I know OPs pic is just ragebait to farm clicks but dude, journos dont even bother trying anymore

>>81970754 (OP)
>It's your fault. Lower your standards, incels.
When the article says Men, they mean "Chad" they don't notice the other guys

>>81970974
1, being fat is death wish for women.

>>81970957
The app ranked users based on desirability
The metric used to determine it? The numbers of likes they'd get
Gee I wonder why women were more desirable?

>>81970974
incels will say 3 but chads will say 10

>>81970754 (OP)
>That subtle usage of a woman in her 30s
Lol

>>81970754 (OP)
https://nypost.com/2025/07/26/lifestyle/men-need-to-lower-their-standards-on-dating-apps-new-study-shows/?utm_medium=social&utm_source=twitter&utm_campaign=nypost
This is genuinely the worst article I've ever read. They measured desirability by how many right swipes a person gets, but the vast majority of the user base was male. That means women are always going to receive a larger total number of right swipes than men. In fact, given that they said the "women go for men with similar desirability," once you standardize the distributions, you find that the average woman goes for the top percentilers of men! They sought out to disprove that 80% of women go for the top 20% of men and ended up literally proving it!

>>81971010
nah she's a 3 (shit facial fat distribution) but picrel is an 8

>>81970754 (OP)
Another bunch of shit from the MSM.
I'd fuck old women, but they won't fuck me.
Whose standards are too high? Not fucking mine, that's for sure.

>>81971007
If she was a 1 then how come she had 900 suitors when I first met her?
>>81971010
I agree I feel like they are a 10 but I wanted some feedback on the matter to determine if I was delusional. It appears that it was just a fluke and now I am destined to never again have such a valuable partner. Extremely crushing realization.

>>81971010
>>81971035
aren't you guys just the chubby chasers that will hook up and then tell them you'd never be seen in public with her?

>>81970754 (OP)
Both men and women need to lower their standards I think. Everyone's way too obsessed with looks nowadays, with their own and everyone else's. My brother and sister are both obese but both want Stacy and Chad, respectively. Fucking ridiculous

>>81971057
It is simple, many men are losers with no standards.

>>81971065
No, I had a really fat gf and I'd go out in public with her and hold her hand and stuff. Bigger women are beautiful, I'd never be ashamed to be seen in public with one.

>>81971065
I posted the webm and there are certainly fat women I would be willing to date traditionally. I don't know the weight limit but the webm I posted is probably very close to it.

>>81971030
The conclusion that "men need to go for women with similar desirability" is nonsense because, the way they measured desirability, even the bottom percentiles of women have more desirability than the average man. There literally aren't women with similar desirability to those men.

>>81971077
Dweebs, they should date eachother.

I am 5'9" (in the morning) it was over before it even began.

>>81971065
i have basically zero libido and wouldn't fuck a model if she asked me to. i just think good looking fat women are unironically on the same level as good looking stacies. equal to the beauty of someone's well-defined bone structure, i find women with aesthetically pleasant fat deposits just as miraculous and gorgeous.

>>81971183
I am 3.5 inches in the morning

>I matched with a 65yo foid.
>I message her.
>She doesn't block me.
>She also does not reply in 24 hours.
>I blocked the cunt.
Why match, if you won't even fucking respond?
I also particularly DESPISE the whole forced 'pretending we don't want to fuck each other' thing. Why even match if there's no sexual attraction?
Most of the matches are as worthless as that one. Though I've started to get a few who claim to be DTF, until I give them the ick before we can meet.
If old women won't even throw me a fuck, then there is no hope of getting non-escort pussy, despite all the worthless matches. It's just a game to them.
I also matched with a chubby one in her mid-40s. She's left me on read. I'm giving her until Monday before I block, as it's the WAX app which is more sexual.

Also matched with a big-titted mid-50s woman who indicated some interest, even bandied some film references around, but she took two days to reply.
Eventually went six days with no reply before I blocked her. All she had to do was meet me and fuck me. I'm not even worth blocking.
Matched with another woman in her 50s. A widow that hadn't been fucked in ten years. Claimed interested in fucking, but never made any arrangement.
I am so sick and tired of these cunts.

>>81970853
>no replies
Speaks volumes honestly.

>>81970754 (OP)
>Men. Men need to lower their standards. Men. Men do. MEN. MEN need to lower their standard. Men. Men are the ones that are too picky. Men.
Gotta love it.

>>81971250
>>81971330
For these reasons I wouldn't try to match with an older woman. They are most likely there for simple attention, more so than younger women.

>>81971250
>Why even match if there's no sexual attraction?
attention harvesting at the expense of your time and dignity

a lot of foids with partners are still on the apps

>>81971002
yeah, I'm a brownoid manlet and have gotten the attention of some women who I realize apparently mog basically the entire tea userbase but I got in my own head about how I basically have no social/sex life compared to chad/what really loud foids, whom I never wanted anything to do with in the first place, said and resigned myself to shut-in status.
social media is poison, etc.

>>81971353
Yet I keep hearing how MILFs and GILFs are more DTF, and more forgiving of non-Chads.
Clearly, they have also been corrupted by fuck apps, just like the younger ones have.
I also hate messaging first, even though it's forever expected for men to do that.
If she were really interested, she'd be messaging me. Though women will wait hours or days, saying nothing, then block.
Therefore, I've had to start messaging them; but getting laid is still impossible, given how they won't answer, dry text, or will ghost anyway. Cunts.
>>81971368
Indeed. It's a shame that foids are not capped to a few likes, and then have to put men out of their misery to get more, instead of just collecting likes like a high score. It's also a shame that the apps are not highly restricted by location. One mile, instead of 100+ miles. If only there were a straight version of Grindr, with a grid system and highly localised. It's a shame there are no female sluts (or grannies) on an app just looking to suck a cock. The fags have cornered the market on getting laid all the time with local strangers.

>>81971010
Lower your standards! There are plenty of overweight burn victims who need men to be a father figure for their 4 children.

>>81970754 (OP)
On todays episode of "women projecting"

>>81970754 (OP)
Study about a czech dating app with very little info and contradictory claims. Why is mainstream american media posting this?

>>81971065
Nah I bring a 300 pounder anywhere and have a great time. Nobody cares.
>>81971083
I have a fat fetish so it has been a total disaster for me that dating fatties has been normalized

>>81971010
i genuinely don't understand how someone can find this kind of stuff even remotely attractive, that and BBLs, it's probably niggers

>>81970754 (OP)
That's true, though. There are tons of horny BBWs desperate for a good plapping, but incels see them as beneath them.

>>81970957
the tea app leak requires this image to be updated. the 1s and 2s are not settling for anything less than 5s ans 6s.

>>81973688
Most of those horny bbws are probably single moms or don't even know how to put in the bare minimum into their appearance