Thread 81974212 - /r9k/ [Archived: 9 hours ago]

Anonymous
7/27/2025, 1:48:09 AM No.81974212
43776524
43776524
md5: ff77e07cf675f15d5a235a045ec9017b🔍
For anyone to be truly my equal, they must have lived my life. But no one has and thus. I am alone in my existence. With no connections, i am adrift in a uncaring universe. Any attempt to reach out met with more mundanity
Replies: >>81974233 >>81974343
Anonymous
7/27/2025, 1:49:23 AM No.81974233
behelit scream
behelit scream
md5: 574f36a445d4703334b066abe5c4764b🔍
>>81974212 (OP)
NOOO DONT DO IT TURN BACK AND GIVE GUTS A HUG DON'T TOUCH THE BEHERIT!!!!!!
Anonymous
7/27/2025, 1:54:40 AM No.81974305
berserk_555
berserk_555
md5: 2ac6be3d733a53bd28722d601906bc71🔍
Casca enjoyed it.
Anonymous
7/27/2025, 1:57:17 AM No.81974343
>>81974212 (OP)
>truly be equal
Your experiences are unique, your ego is dynamic. Equality is for rights of women, not value amongst men.
>uncaring universe
as opposed to god? The universe isn't an entity that can care. Why would the absence of it be filtered through human character?
Replies: >>81974620
Anonymous
7/27/2025, 2:19:04 AM No.81974620
maxresdefault
maxresdefault
md5: bcc1cec02386103eec83f1566a78c93c🔍
>>81974343
>why would the absence of it be filtered through human character.

Because who are we if not the universe. Without observer, the universe would return back to a superposition of being purely hypothetical. If humanity is the deciding factor of which the universe exists or not. Then it is inherintly human in character. If the observer were to be colorblind, the universe would ceise to have color

>equality is for right of women
That is a bastardization of the word by feminists. And simply by using it they should be seen as cattle

>not value amonst men
If no one is able to be my equal they would be incapable of seeing all that i am, all they would see is the shadow on the wall. A figure, a caricature, simply an npc in their own story. No one bothering to look further at the mind behind it.